Chinese monetary policy | PBOC advisor says policies increase risk of Chinese real estate bubble

PBOC advisor says policies increase risk of Chinese real estate bubble

March 3, 2016 1:03 PM (UTC+8)

 

Central bank policy adviser Bai Chongen said China’s monetary policies have created the risk of a real estate bubble because they encouraged investors to pour money into property, inflating prices in cities such as Beijing, Shanghai and Shenzhen.

globeMeanwhile, excess inventory in smaller property markets, making a unified policy response difficult to create and requires careful coordination with fiscal measures, he said Wednesday on the sidelines of a joint symposioum in Hangzhou hosted by the People’s Bank of China and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.

“I can’t say whether there are bubbles right now, but we’re worried about such a problem,” said Bai. Government goals to cut oversupply in smaller cities and controlling the bubble in bigger ones “are contradictory,” he said in an interview with Bloomberg.

China has sought to balance sustaining economic growth while controlling capital outflows and managing the yuan and stock markets. It has had to weigh the impact of those moves with the risk of destabilizing the property sector.

The economics professor at Tsinghua University in Beijing is one of three outside academic advisers on the PBOC’s 15-member monetary policy committee led by Governor Zhou Xiaochuan. The trio offer analysis to policy makers but don’t set policy themselves.

“Interest rates have gone down a lot, and it would certainly boost asset prices in tier-one cities, but that doesn’t help tier-three or four cities with their overly high inventories,” he said.

The overhang of excess housing supply continues. While new construction is running at about 10.5 million units a year, demand is for less than 8 million units per year, according to an analysis by Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Fielding Chen in Hong Kong.

“There won’t be new investment in tier 3 and 4 cities,” Bai said. “And there shouldn’t be any new investment — there’s already so much in inventory.

Comments