Moscow eyes role as Korean
mediator By Sergei Blagov
MOSCOW - In pledging to strengthen
ties with both North and South Korea, Russia is boosting
its diplomatic profile on the highly volatile peninsula
and presumably considering whether to seek a larger
mediation role there.
Notably, Russian Foreign
Minister Igor Ivanov is to visit Seoul July 26-28 and
Pyonyang on July 28-29 for talks on the Korean peninsula
as well as economic issues. Within the past two years,
Moscow's "new Korean policy", involving balanced ties
with both Seoul and Pyongyang has brought some positive
gains, Russian official news agency RIA commented on
July 23.
No immediate breakthrough should be
expected from Ivanov's mission to the Korean capitals,
yet Moscow now is well positioned to discuss transport
and energy projects on the peninsula, RIA commented.
Moreover, in a departure from the decades-long tradition
of bending over backward to please North Korea, now
Russian officials are indicating willingness to raise
some "delicate" questions in Pyongyang.
Ivanov
in fact may raise the issue of alleged abductions of
Japanese nationals during this month's Pyongyang visit,
Russian Foreign Ministry spokesman Alexander Yakovenko
said last week. Russian government officials sound
optimistic about the prospect for renewed dialogue
between North and South Korea.
Konstantin
Pulikovsky, Russian President Vladimir Putin's special
representative to the Far Eastern Federal District, said
earlier this month that Pyongyang was seeking to
escape its current isolation and would like to establish
good relations with its neighbors. Pulikovsky made the
remark at a news briefing in Russia's far eastern city
of Khabarovsk, where he was welcoming a 350-member South
Korean delegation of businessmen, artists, journalists
and government officials promoting Russian-South Korean
friendship.
The delegation then embarked
upon a train, dubbed the "Korea-Russia Friendship
Express", to take them on a 17-day journey marking the
12th anniversary of the establishment of diplomatic
relations between the two countries. The delegation
began its journey in the eastern port of Vladivostok and
is now traveling to Moscow and St Petersburg.
Paradoxically, the South Korean mission, which
is due to return to Seoul on August 1, follows in the
footsteps of Pyongyang's "Dear Leader" Kim Jong-il, who
traveled 13,000 kilometers from the North Korean
capital to Moscow and back along the Trans-Siberian
railroad last year. In order to arrive in Moscow and
come back home, Kim undertook an unprecedented trip in a
21-car, Japanese-built armored express train.
Subsequently, Pulikovsky has become a sort of
self-made expert on reclusive North Korean leader, since
he accompanied Kim Jong-il on the 24-day train ride and
wrote a book about the journey. The Soviet Union was a
close ally of Pyongyang during the 1950-53 war, but
relations experienced a downturn following the Soviet
collapse in 1991. Russia, Pyongyang's neighbor thanks to
a narrow land border near Vladivostok, has sharply
downgraded its ties with North Korea.
There has
been a corresponding increase in Russian trade links
with South Korea, which is still technically at war with
North Korea. However, in 2000 Moscow and Pyongyang
signed a new bilateral treaty to replace an outmoded
Soviet-era accord in place since 1961. In the meantime,
between 1992 and 2000, bilateral trade dropped from $600
million to $105 million a year. Moreover, the bulk, some
90 percent, of North Korean exports to Russia consists
of cheap labor force. North Korean workers are typically
engaged at forestry projects.
Russia has
promised to help rebuild North Korean enterprises
launched during the Soviet era, including power
projects, although Moscow's aid is conditional on
regular payments on Pyongyang's Soviet-era debt,
estimated at between $2.9 billion and $4.4 billion. On
the other hand, Moscow reportedly offered Seoul to repay
its $1.7 billion debt to South Korea by "joint"
investments in North Korean projects, including
modernization of North Korea's energy system and
construction of Korea's North-South railway - to be
connected with Russia's Trans-Siberian railway.
In recent years Pyongyang has indicated its
willingness to get involved in high-profile projects. In
1997, North Korea reportedly agreed to carry a
5,000-kilometer pipeline exporting Russian natural gas
from Siberia to South Korea and thence to Japan.
Pyongyang's agreement was vital to
the project. Moscow and Pyongyang have also mulled the Tumangan
project, which envisions the development of the Tuman
River basin - where Primorie (the southernmost region of
modern Russia), China and North Korea meet - into a
major trading area. However, both gas pipeline and
Tumangan projects remain on the drawing boards. Moscow's
newfound initiative has not gone without protest at
home.
The plan to rebuild the Trans-Korean railroad and
link it to the Trans-Siberian poses a "huge political
risk" and would require substantial investment, says
Railways Minister Guennady Fadeyev. The project is
estimated to cost about $250 million. Completing the
link is expected to significantly increase cargo transit
via the Trans-Siberian railroad and reduce the time
needed for the shipment of goods from South Korea to
Europe.
Therefore, Russia presumably aims at being a part of
economic cooperation on the Korean peninsula that would
lead to eventual reunification. However, a variety of
reasons, including bureaucratic obstacles in the
reclusive communist state and its undeveloped legal and
banking systems, have been hindered economic cooperation
and Russia-backed projects. Yet in one particular area
North Korea does seek cooperation with Russia.
When North Korean Defense Minister, Vice Marshal Kim
Il-chol, visited Moscow in April 2001, he clinched a
deal on bilateral cooperation in the defense industry
and military equipment. Nearly all weapons used by North
Korean military are obsolete Soviet-made models or
domestically manufactured arms produced under Soviet
licenses.
Currently, Russian arms sales to
North Korea are estimated at some $10 million a year,
presumably a minimum level to supply the North Korean
army with most needed spare parts. North Korea
reportedly sought some $100 million of Russian arms
supplies per annum yet Moscow has been reluctant to
extend new loans to cash-strapped Pyongyang.
The North Korean armed
forces have 50 missiles, 2,300 tanks, 10,000 pieces of
artillery, some 50 naval vessels (including three
frigates, six mine sweepers, and 40 missile boats) and
23 Romeo and Whiskey class diesel submarines. North
Korean armored units mainly use obsolete Soviet and
Chinese makes, including the legendary T-34 main Soviet
battle tank of World War Two and a few newer T-62 Soviet
and "Type-59" Chinese tanks. North Korean artillery
mainly consists of obsolete makes, except relatively
modern "Gvozdika" and "Acacia" self-propelled howitzers.
Pyongyang airforce still uses
obsolete MiG-17, MiG-19, MiG-23, but also newer Su-25
and 30 modern MiG-29. Missile forces include 20 Luna-M
tactical complexes and 30 Scud missiles, known as Rodong
in North Korea.
Although North Korean missiles,
as well as most other pieces of military hardware
supplied during the Soviet era, have long grown
obsolete, Washington has been branding Pyongyang a
missile exporter and developer of weapons of mass
destruction. Finally US President George W Bush included
North Korea in an axis of evil. So far, the Kremlin has
been reluctant to subscribe to Washington's criticism of
North Korea. Although Putin became the first Kremlin
leader ever to visit Pyongyang in July 2000, he faced an
embarrassment.
Kim Jong-il reportedly offered to abandon
his country's missile program if the United States
agreed to launch North Korean satellites. Just as Moscow
started to herald this statement as a diplomatic
victory, Kim subsequently dismissed the offer as a joke.
Hence Russia's attempt to mediate between Washington and
Pyongyang failed. Therefore, it remains to be seen
whether Russia's moves to boost its diplomatic weight on
the Korean Peninsula are likely to produce any
meaningful results - notably due to Moscow's limited
ability to influence global issues.
(©2002 Asia
Times Online Co, Ltd. All rights reserved. Please
contact content@atimes.com
for information on our sales and syndication
policies.)
|