Search Asia Times

Advanced Search

 
Central Asia

Russians reject Chinese bid for port
By John Helmer

MOSCOW - A year-long bid by the Chinese government to establish a foothold for exports from its northwestern province of Jilin through a nearby Russian port has been scotched by a Russian coal and steel group intent on shipping its own products. An increasingly vocal economic nationalistic approach to commercial rivalry from Russia's neighbors is likely to be the keynote of the incoming cabinet of Prime Minister Mikhail Fradkov, who in 2000 headed economic security at the Kremlin's Security Council.

The Mechel group, which includes the Mechel Steel plant in central Russia, the Yuzhny Kusbass coal mines and the Korshunovsky iron-ore mine in southeastern Siberia, is set to take control of the Russian far eastern port of Posyet from MDM, a Moscow-based banking and metals group.

A year ago, Chinese representatives at a session of the Sino-Russian government commission on economic cooperation tabled a proposal for Chinese management, on long-term lease, of the ports of Posyet and Zarubino. The Chinese intention, they said, was to export various products, notably coal, from the Tunangan economic region. Intended markets for the shipments were Japan and the United States. The two Russian Pacific ports are close to the Sino-Russian border, and plans to upgrade them as an outlet for Chinese exports across the Pacific have been under discussion by Russian, Chinese and US transportation officials for several years. The discussions had failed to inject any money into the two ports, which remain small backwaters.

Chingiz Izmaylov, deputy minister in the federal Ministry of Transport in Moscow, responded immediately to the initial Chinese offer, saying that his ministry "advocates the use of existing port facilities by Russian companies and doesn't see the need to rent out port terminals to foreign companies, when Russian companies can provide the transportation services and develop port facilities". Izmaylov wasn't totally negative toward Beijing, adding that he would consider negotiating alternative proposals from the Chinese government for export operations through the ports, on condition that there would be no change in legal management.

The Chinese government move initially took Russian commercial port interests by surprise, because both Posyet and Zarubino were owned by private Russian joint stock companies. MDM held a 65 percent stake in Posyet, while Zarubino was controlled by a little-known Russian company called Universe-Holding.

Industry sources told Asia Times Online this week that MDM is under Russian government pressure to divest assets, but for the record MDM refuses to confirm that it has done a deal with Mechel to sell its stake in the port. Alexei Sotskov, spokesman for Mechel, added that for the time being he would have "no comment".

Larisa Romanenko, an executive with the Posyet port company, said that Siberian Coal Energy Co (SUEK), a unit of the MDM group, currently supplies 64 percent of the throughput of the port. SUEK, she added, controlled 69 percent of the port company's shares, with 13 percent in state hands and another 11 percent held by expediter Ferrotrans. Coal bound for Japan is the primary cargo, followed by ferroalloys produced by the Kuznetsk Ferroalloy plant, which has also been part of the MDM group. Turnover at the port reached 845,000 tons in 2003, up 37 percent from 2002. This year, Romanenko told Asia Times Online, Posyet should move about a million tons of cargo in all. When built in the Soviet period, Posyet had a maximum cargo capacity of 1.5 million tons. It ranks fifth in size of the Russian ports on the Sea of Japan and Sea of Okhotsk after Vostochny, Vladivostok, Nakhodka and Vanino.

Alexander Lashin, deputy head of the Transportation Department of Primorye region, where Posyet and Zarubino are located, said his region is opposed to the Chinese takeover. "The overwhelming majority of cargoes that go through Russian ports in Primorye are Russian export cargoes. Chinese transit cargoes amount to only a very small volume." He was skeptical, he added, that the Chinese would use Posyet and Zarubino for container shipping to and from Japan and the west coast of the United States. "Most of the US-bound cargoes from China still go through Chinese, not Russian, ports." Lashin admitted that Zarubino port was close to bankruptcy, but that despite that, the negotiations between the controlling shareholders of the port and Chinese interests weren't acceptable to Primorye, which is one of the port's biggest creditors.

A spokesman of SUEK responded to the Chinese offer last year by saying that Chinese coal would be competing for the same export markets as Russian coal produced by SUEK. "It doesn't make sense to assist natural competitors," the source told Asia Times Online. SUEK had also been a vocal opponent in the past of proposals from China to build rail access for their coal exports to the trans-Siberian rail network and thence to the larger Russian far eastern ports of Vladivostok and Vostochny.

(Copyright 2004 Asia Times Online Ltd. All rights reserved. Please contact content@atimes.com for information on our sales and syndication policies.)


Mar 11, 2004



China in surprise move on Russian ports (Apr 10, '03)

 

 

 
   
         
No material from Asia Times Online may be republished in any form without written permission.
Copyright 2003, Asia Times Online, 4305 Far East Finance Centre, 16 Harcourt Rd, Central, Hong Kong