WRITE for ATol ADVERTISE MEDIA KIT GET ATol BY EMAIL ABOUT ATol CONTACT US
Asia Time Online - Daily News
              Click Here
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese



    Central Asia
     Sep 23, 2006
THE HUNGRY BEAR, Part 1
Promises that can't be kept
By W Joseph Stroupe

At the third annual meeting known as the Valdai Club, a meeting between President Vladimir Putin of Russia and Russia-watchers made up largely of Western political scientists and academics and held this year on September 9, Putin acknowledged Russia's great and mounting global energy leverage, but he also delivered an ostensibly reassuring promise that Russia would not use its



rapidly intensifying and expanding global energy leverage to dominate others like "a superpower" would.

The Valdai Club has become a choice forum for Putin to attempt to allay Western fears over Russia's increasingly assertive and independent course and to polish Russia's image abroad. As such, one must realize that at a forum that is obviously slanted toward achievement of such political and public relations goals, the statements and claims made are specifically designed to accomplish the forum's purpose, and one must apply the appropriate subjectivity filters when analyzing them.

The hard fact is that a series of powerful arguments and irrefutable evidence exist to render completely hollow Putin's promise to "play nice" with mounting Russian global energy leverage. Even if Putin's promise is truly sincere and heartfelt, trends and forces not nearly under his control will soon dictate an outcome precisely opposite of his soothing promise, rendering it completely empty. How so? And what are the powerful arguments and irrefutable evidence that establish beyond any doubt the accuracy of such a conclusion?

Promises, promises!
Putin heads a resurgent Russia that is racing ever faster toward the consolidation of its key global position as respects energy security, the unique global position where it, more than any other single energy exporter, can and in fact already is setting the global agenda and taking the unquestioned leadership role in defining and drawing the circle of international energy security.

As evidenced at the recent Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit in June, where Putin proposed the creation of an SCO-centered energy club, and the Group of Eight summit the following month, Russia has already expertly threaded the needle of international energy security policy, doing so with the thread of its own compelling energy security vision and strategy, powerfully bolstered by its mounting global energy leverage. It is now deftly wielding that needle and thread to sew together the circle made up of the globe's key energy producers and the powerful rising energy consuming economies of the East.

The profoundly deepening relations between Russia and the vast bulk of the globe's resource-rich regimes, along with the collective, increasing tilt of that entire producer grouping toward the rising markets in the East in accelerating diversification away from the traditional markets in the West, evidences the mounting potency of Russia's key global leadership role as respects energy. The circle of energy security is being drawn, is near to completion, and its center is in the East, not in the West. The current resources-based geopolitical rise of Russia and its partners bespeaks their impending, collective achievement of global ascendancy at the potentially gargantuan economic and political expense of the West.

Only 15 years ago matters were reversed - it was the West that was achieving global ascendancy at the gargantuan expense of Russia and the East. The Soviet Empire had collapsed in 1991 and soothing promises were made back then, too, notably by another leader that headed the then-ascendant world power, president George H W Bush, the 41st president of the United States. Are the current soothing promises of the ascendant Russian president any more reliable than were those of the 41st president of the US?

On January 28, 1992 during his first State of the Union address after the collapse of the Soviet Union, Bush said:
I mean to speak tonight of big things, of big changes and the promises they hold, and of some big problems and how together we can solve them and move our country forward as the undisputed leader of the age. We gather tonight at a dramatic and deeply promising time in our history, and in the history of man on earth. For in the past 12 months, the world has known changes of almost Biblical proportions. And even now, months after the failed coup that doomed a failed system, I am not sure we have absorbed the full impact, the full import of what happened. But communism died this year.

Much good can come from the prudent use of power. And much good can come of this: a world once divided into two armed camps now recognizes one sole and pre-eminent power - the United States of America. And they regard this with no dread. For the world trusts us with power - and the world is right. They trust us to be fair and restrained; they trust us to be on the side of decency. They trust us to do what's right.
Then-president Bush made an apparently sincere and heartfelt promise that the US has most certainly, at least in the view of the world at large, failed miserably to keep - the promise not to misuse its great power. Sound familiar?

The mounting global energy leverage that is increasingly coming to reside in the hands of circle-drawing Russia and its strategic partners is an irresistible power literally unequalled in all human history, for it is the power to throttle, or even to credibly threaten to strangle, the highly industrialized economies of the West. Such power makes the military potency of the US and/or of the old Soviet Union pale by comparison.

Why should anyone believe that Putin and rising Russia and its increasingly authoritarian resource-rich global partners are an exception to the maxim that says "Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely", when even the leaders of the liberal democratic West have finally succumbed to gross arrogance and presumptuousness and did not prove to be such exceptions?

What do Russian policies and actions to date reveal as to the issue of whether or not Russia is "acting like an energy superpower"?

Part 2 The actions of an energy superpower

W Joseph Stroupe is editor of Global Events Magazine online at www.GeoStrategyMap.com. He has authored a new book on the implications of ongoing energy geopolitics entitled, Russian Rubicon –Impending Checkmate of the West.

(Copyright 2006 W Joseph Stroupe. Used with permission.)

Russia spins global energy spider's web (Aug 25, '06)

Venezuela, Russia: Comrades in arms
(Aug 2, '06)

US outflanked in Eurasia energy politics
(Jun 10, '06)

 
 



All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
© Copyright 1999 - 2006 Asia Times Online Ltd.
Head Office: Rm 202, Hau Fook Mansion, No. 8 Hau Fook St., Kowloon, Hong Kong
Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110