WRITE for ATol ADVERTISE MEDIA KIT GET ATol BY EMAIL ABOUT ATol CONTACT US
Asia Time Online - Daily News
             
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese



    Central Asia
     Aug 15, 2008
An inevitable clash
By Brian M Downing

The Russian invasion of the South Ossetian enclave in Georgia should call into question a basic component of United States foreign policy - the integration of Eastern Europe and former Soviet republics into the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). This policy has been pursued by Democratic and Republican administrations, but with no public debate and with little thought as to the long-term consequences. The consequences are now becoming clear, and they are unpleasant.

On Thursday, thousands of Russian troops were still in South Ossetia after driving out Georgian forces that tried to regain control of the breakaway region in an attack last Friday.

US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice is in France for talks

 

> with President Nicolas Sarkozy, who currently chairs the European Union, before visiting Georgia on Friday. The US has begun delivering aid by air to the former Soviet republic.

Moscow's response signals several positions. Russia will intervene in foreign countries to protect ethnic Russians living there. Russia can readily control or even cut off important oil pipelines connecting the resources of Central Asia to Western markets, one of which runs through Georgia. The attack also signals Russia's displeasure with NATO expansion into Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Republics. Since the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991, NATO has taken under its increasingly expansive wing Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia, Poland, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Bulgaria, Romania and Slovenia. Georgia plans to join in the next few years.

This process has been going on for 15 years, under the Bill Clinton and George W Bush administrations. And it is as ill thought out as any foreign policy the US has pursued in decades. The American public greeted each new NATO member as though they were new neighbors, not as distant and even remote countries the US was now obliged to defend. NATO is a mutual defense pact and members are required to go to war if one of them is attacked.

Nor was the effect on Russia thought out. As is well known - though not well comprehended - Russian history is filled with periodic devastating invasions, from Germany (twice), France, Sweden and the Mongols. Russian governments, and the public as well, look on events on their periphery with concerns and fears that people of a country sharing borders with Canada and Mexico cannot understand.

NATO forces, pressing steadily deeper into what Russia thought to be a defensive glacis from a resurgent Germany, set off alarms in the Russian bureaus and public alike, thereby contributing to the return to authoritarian government based on national security and militarism.

In retrospect, following the collapse of the Soviet Union, an agreement should and probably could have been reached between Russian and NATO powers, which banned each power's forces from Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Republics.

But that was not pursued and here we stand at the dangerous intersection of a heedless NATO policy and a timeless Russian mindset. In the aftermath of the Ossetian intervention, Americans might well ask themselves if they are willing to go to war to defend remote countries for whom they have little obligation, except what stems from those countries having been persuaded to send troops to Iraq in exchange for some assurance of US/NATO protection.

It's unclear if the people of Western Europe, who are less enamored by war than Americans are, and who look at least somewhat more thoughtfully on world affairs, are asking themselves the same question.

It is more probable, however, that events in Georgia will lead to more rapid military modernization in new NATO members and a few more countries applying for membership (tuition-free, of course). This in turn will intensify Russian security concerns and authoritarian trends - dynamics that were likely foreseen by Russia. A new cold war has begun.

Brian M Downing is the author of several works of political and military history, including The Military Revolution and Political Change and The Paths of Glory: War and Social Change in America from the Great War to Vietnam. He can be reached at brianmdowning@gmail.com.

(Copyright 2008 Brian M Downing.)


Russian halt leaves crucial questions
(Aug 14, '08)

Georgia's Israeli arms point Russia to Iran (Aug 14, '08)

Russia marks its red lines
(Aug 13, '08)

The end of the post-Cold War era
(Aug 13, '08)


1. Georgia's Israeli arms point Russia to Iran

2. Putin for US president- more than ever

3. Taliban win a fight - and settle a score

4. The US dollar on Roman steroids

5. Russian halt leaves crucial questions

6. Russia marks its red lines

7. The end of the post-Cold War era

8. Israel and Iran: A bridge too far?

9. Oil in troubled mountains

10. Russia bids to rid Georgia of its folly

11. Israel has peace in its hands

(24 hours to 11:59pm ET, Aug 13, 2008)

 
 



All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
© Copyright 1999 - 2008 Asia Times Online (Holdings), Ltd.
Head Office: Unit B, 16/F, Li Dong Building, No. 9 Li Yuen Street East, Central, Hong Kong
Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110