Russia's executioners live on in the streets
By Vladimir Kara-Muza
I never thought I'd find myself agreeing with Vladimir Yakunin.
A product of the "organs" (it is widely believed that in the 1980s he worked as
a KGB agent in New York), a member of Vladimir Putin's shadowy Ozero dacha
cooperative, the director of several commercial firms, a trustee of a
"patriotic-Great Power" organization, the head of Russian Railways - Yakunin's
biography is a model portrait of the elite of Russia's current chekist
kleptocracy.
But, as they say, even a broken clock is right twice a day.
This month, Yakunin signed an order restoring the historical name of Moscow's
Leningradsky railway station - Nikolayevsky vokzal. And he promised that this
rechristening would not be the last. However, the order stood for only a few
hours - after an urgent
telephone call, it was rescinded and the map of the capital continues to show a
station bearing the name of a city that no longer exists, a name that honors
the pseudonym of the founder of one of the cruelest and most bloody regimes in
world history.
I imagine the incident with Leningradsky station will stifle Yakunin's urge for
reform for a long time to come.
Covered In blood
No one is surprised that the map of today's Berlin does not show an
Adolf-Hitler-Platz (which was what the current Theodor-Heuss-Platz was called
from 1933-45) or a Hermann-Goering-Strasse (as Ebertstrasse was called from
1935-45). So why do the cities and streets of our country continue to carry the
names of executioners who are covered in blood; who plundered its riches; who
profaned its spiritual and cultural heritage; who executed and deported its
peasants, priests, and writers; who destroyed all that was best and living and
creative in the Russian people?
Why are regions of Novosibirsk, Volgograd and Perm still named after Feliks
Dzerzhinsky, the creator of the machinery of state terror under whose personal
leadership more than 1.5 million people were destroyed in the first years after
the October Revolution?
Why is the largest area of the Urals region still named after Mikhail Sverdlov,
the author of an October 2, 1918, order declaring that terror against "the
enemies of the revolution" was the official policy of the Soviet government?
Why is there still in St Petersburg - the birthplace of Russia's parliamentary
tradition - a street named for Anatoly Zheleznyakov, the symbol of the
Bolshevik coup against the first and only session of the All-Russian
Constituent Assembly ("The workers don't need any more of your blabbering! The
watchman is tired!")?
Why does the map of Moscow still show a Prospekt Andropova, named for the
father of punitive psychiatry and the initiator of the exile of Alexander
Solzhenitsyn, Vladimir Bukovsky and Aleksandr Galich and of the internal exile
of Andrei Sakharov?
Or maybe that last question isn't appropriate ...
Symptom of the illness
After the coming to power of Andropov's disciples in 2000, a memorial plaque
dedicated to him was installed on Lubyanka Square, while new monuments to him
were erected in Rybinsk and Petrozavodsk. In 2007, when the opposition was
promoting Bukovsky as a presidential candidate, he returned to Moscow after
many years abroad and had to travel from the airport into the capital along
Prospekt Andropova.
The naming of streets is not a trivial matter.
The preservation of Soviet toponyms is a symptom of the illness of our society,
which has still not been able to cure itself of the totalitarian infection. We
were able to take the first step - in August 1991, the power of the Communist
Party of the Soviet Union was broken and in 1992 the Constitutional Court
declared the communist regime "criminal". But we were afraid to take the second
step by condemning these crimes at the state level, by banning totalitarian
ideologies and their symbols, by undertaking a process of lustration aimed at
all the former prison guards.
No, back in 1991 and 1992 a false nobility of the victors prevailed.
"We don't need to rock the boat," people said. "We don't need witch hunts." So
why should we be surprised when just eight years later the witches returned and
began their own hunting?
Our current authorities showed their true face better than ever in their
reaction to a recent resolution by the Parliamentary Assembly of the
Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, which stated a banal
truth: "Two powerful totalitarian regimes - Nazi and Stalinist - brought
genocide, the destruction of human rights and freedoms, war crimes and crimes
against humanity."
Over the past nine years, the regime of Vladimir Putin has lost the ability to
surprise, but I think even Kremlin apologists were at least irked by the public
defense of Stalinism coming from the mouths of officials in the Foreign
Ministry and the Federal Assembly.
Foreign Ministry spokesman Andrei Nesterenko called the resolution "a
perversion of history".
I wonder which feature of Stalinism our state bureaucrats consider "perverted".
The destruction of the human rights and freedoms? After all, that description
does seem somewhat "perverted" considering that we are talking about the
literal destruction of millions of human beings. Or maybe our officials are
upset about the very fact of comparing these two totalitarian systems, which
were in fact all but identical in cruelty, in political structure and even in
style.
"On the entire planet and throughout all of history, there has never been a
regime more evil, more bloody, and, at the same time, more shrewd and cunning
than the Bolshevist regime. No other earthly regime - not even the apprentice
Nazi regime - can compare with it in terms of the numbers of its victims, or
the depth of its infection over so many years, or the scope of its design, or
its thoroughly unified totalitarianism."
These words don't come from any Organization for Security and Cooperation in
Europe resolution. They were written by Alexander Solzhenitsyn in The Gulag
Archipelago, volume 3, chapter 5.
The restoration of historical names and ridding ourselves of the legacy of
Soviet totalitarianism is not matter for politicians. It is the business of all
of society to see to it that the names of our streets and cities reflect the
history of Russia and do not glorify its executioners.
Vladimir Kara-Muza is a journalist and historian and a member of the
Solidarity opposition movement. The views expressed in this commentary, which
originally appeared on the website
Yezhednevny zhurnal, are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect
those of RFE/RL.
Head
Office: Unit B, 16/F, Li Dong Building, No. 9 Li Yuen Street East,
Central, Hong Kong Thailand Bureau:
11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110
