FlyChina
 
China

AOL's Asian cousin
By Gary LaMoshi

HONG KONG - An Information Age newcomer emerges as a stock-market darling, richly rewarding investors. Its chairman's face adorns glossy business-magazine covers as a guru of a new cyber era that is changing the world.

At the height of Internet frenzy, the new economy icon sets it sights on an old-economy plodder in a related field. The promise of passing through the looking glass into technology wonderland seduces the venerable company and its shareholders. Some of the dot-commers, unsold on potential synergy, balk at the idea of saddling their sleek virtual machine with this drag on earnings.

Doubts brushed aside, the record-setting deal closes, but the companies do not live together happily ever after. The Internet bubble bursts, and the new-economy company gets a valuation based on its real earnings rather than visions of a 24/7-wired universe.

Fast-forward a couple of years, and that old-economy plodder provides the only honest value in the merged company. But the dinosaur's worth is diminished by its association with the fallen icon. The stock price is in freefall, savagely punishing investors.

In a nutshell, that's the story of the record-setting America Online-Time Warner merger. Except that's not the story I have mind. It's more precisely the story of Pacific Century CyberWorks' purchase of Hong Kong Telecom. After hearing it, AOL shareholders may realize they should praise chairman Steve Case, not bury him.

The PCCW story begins with its chairman, Richard Li, the flamboyant son of Hong Kong's leading tycoon Li Ka-shing. More responsible son Victor is due to take the helm of the family's Hutchison Whampoa property and communications empire. Poor Richard was thrown out into the cruel world, kicking around as an investment banker and entrepreneur on three continents until he launched PCCW.

Tricom transformed
In early 1999, young Li's Hong Kong-listed Tricom acquired the rights to develop a fine piece of property on Hong Kong island. Li said he would create CyberPort, a regional center for the Internet industry (though 75 percent of the development would be more conventional and profitable residential). Land is more valuable than gold in Hong Kong, but Tricom, which would soon rename itself Pacific Century CyberWorks, obtained the land from the Hong Kong government without the usual public tender process at a sweetheart price.

You may believe the elder Li's close relationship with Hong Kong Chief Executive Tung Chee-hwa and his minders in Beijing had nothing to do with Tricom's stroke of good fortune. That's easy to believe, compared with Richard Li's subsequent cyberbabble that sent PCCW shares to a high of HK$26.35 (US$3.39) in early 2000.

Li became the poster boy and leading quote for Asia's catch-up play in the Internet age. No doubt he envied the fame of Silicon Valley's young pioneers, some of whom attended Stanford University with him. (Last year, Li's claim that he graduated from Stanford, echoed in PCCW documents and every fawning profile, was proved false.)

Heralding the age of "convergence" between the computer and the television, Li launched Network of the World (NOW), which aimed its web-delivered content as a dagger at the heart of satellite TV broadcasters, such as the rival Murdoch clan's StarTV. Ironically, Rupert Murdoch's purchase of the red-ink broadcaster from founder Li provided seed money for the property investments that became PCCW.

NOW made a limited appearance on a few cable systems, notable only for proving only that PCCW could produce something other than hot air. The company's primary activity was trading its hot stock for stock in other Internet visionaries, most of which proved to be worthless, and issuing breathless news releases about molding the digital future in Asia and beyond. Li's rhetoric, the global dot-com mania, and willing investment banking accomplices fobbed more PCCW shares on to a gullible public to finance the madness.

Isn't it romantic?
On Valentine's Day 2000, Li proposed to HKT, Hong Kong's former telephone monopoly. Owner Cable & Wireless (of the former colonial ruler) was looking to unload its imperial relic. Though it still threw off lots of cash, HKT's growth prospects were minimal as new operators attacked its formerly exclusive markets with entrepreneurial zeal largely absent in HKT's bureaucratic culture.

Singapore Telecom had come sniffing around HKT. Hong Kong's great and good were outraged that their city-state rival might seize their communications jewel and, with it, regional telecom supremacy. Enter PCCW, amid suspicions that local and Beijing mandarins had encouraged this local favorite to bid. C&W accepted PCCW's HK$250 billion proposal over a competing offer from SingTel, which added Murdoch's News Corp- as an eleventh-hour partner.

HKT management had made a timely and successful move into Internet services, along with less successful forays into pay television (including the vaunted movies-on-demand arena), giving PCCW a semblance of synergy in the acquisition. AOL's merger with Time Warner was a much better fit, with each partner contributing distinct platforms, content and paying customers. PCCW had none of the above.

HKT may have been a company nearing its expiration date, but it was nevertheless selling for HK$17.35 before PCCW swooped in. It offered 1.1 PCCW shares for each HKT share, or two alternative combinations of PCCW shares and cash. The bursting Internet bubble in the United States sent PCCW stock plummeting before the deal closed in August 2000, despite heady valuations from Hong Kong bankers, most of whom had some piece of the deal.

Nearly all shareholders opted for the combination offers, worth HK$18.26 or HK$18.19 at the time the deal closed, when PCCW stock sold for HK$15.40. C&W, which hoped to get US$11.3 billion and about 10 percent of PCCW in the deal, instead wound up with barely US$6 billion and more than 21 percent of PCCW's shares, which it has sold as quickly as permitted under terms of the deal, further pummeling the stock.

Green cheese
As part of PCCW, HKT has gone from slowly turning sour like old milk in the back of the fridge to Limburger in the afternoon sun, largely because of the US$12 billion PCCW needed to borrow for the deal. PCCW's Internet investments have fared similarly and its convergence ambitions have been quashed, leaving HKT's dull, shrinking telephone operation as all the value that's left in the company. Shares in the combined company fell through the HK$1 barrier on Monday.

While C&W and HKT former shareholders may be rightfully incensed at what happened to their investment, they had a chance to sell out before the deal closed. PCCW shareholders, on the other hand, should salute Richard Li for attaching something of value to their inflated shares; otherwise they'd be holding nothing but cyberspace today.

Back in the US, many AOL-Time Warner investors, including top shareholder and board member Ted Turner, are calling for the head of chairman Case; at merger time Turner had compared his excitement to "the first time I made love". As with Hong Kong deal, it all depends which side of the merger you were on.

AOL shareholders should praise Case for using his bubble-priced paper to diversify the company while Yahoo! and other cyberdarlings missed the boat. Time Warner shareholders have no one to blame but themselves. Like HKT investors, they could have sold. Instead, along with Time Warner management, they drank the Kool-aid.

(©2002 Asia Times Online Co, Ltd. All rights reserved. Please contact content@atimes.com for information on our sales and syndication policies.)
 
Oct 10, 2002



 

Affiliates
Click here to be one)
 


   
         
No material from Asia Times Online may be republished in any form without written permission.
Copyright Asia Times Online, 6306 The Center, Queen’s Road, Central, Hong Kong.