Advertise with ATimes!

Search Asia Times

Advanced Search

 
China

Taiwan re-evaluates direct transport links
By Jamie Miyazaki

The pro-independence agenda of Taiwanese president Chen Shui-bian and his Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) have never gone down well in Beijing's corridors of power. While cross-Strait political relations have been in suspended animation ever since Chen's inauguration in 2000, economic links seem to be strengthening ever more rapidly.

Discussions about China-Taiwan economic relations tend to center on the ban on the "three links" - direct transport, trade and postal links. Chen's proposals last week on lifting the ban on direct transport links by the end of next year were thus noteworthy. The DPP is not noted for its support of closer economic links with Beijing.

With his eye on next March's presidential elections, Chen's proposals are more to do with electoral maneuvering than heralding a thaw in cross-Strait relations. Facing an unusually united opposition and a lackluster track record in office, Chen looks set for a tough battle. Promises of reassessing direct transport links are a good way of appealing to the business community, which has long lobbied for re-establishing the three links.

What is noteworthy is Chen's and a recent government report's focus on the issue of direct transport links as opposed to the broader three-links issue. The "three links" are in effect an artificial distinction - once direct transport links were established, trade and postal links would inevitably follow. Moreover, prohibition of direct transport links has been continuously eroding. January saw the arrival of the first Taiwanese commercial flight on mainland soil since 1949 for the Chinese New Year. Ferries already link the offshore Taiwanese islands of Matsu and Kinmen with Fujian province on the mainland. Considering how ineffective the three links have been at discouraging Taiwanese firms from investing in the mainland, a reassessment of their efficacy by Taipei is long overdue, even if it is motivated by hopes for electoral gain.

It is apparent that restrictions on direct transport links increase costs for Taiwanese firms operating in mainland China. Less clear is how much these costs would be reduced if direct links were established, as this is dependant on the number of points of entry on both sides and the number of firms cleared to operate on the routes. Chen envisages a three-phase timetable leading finally to full direct transport links.

Taiwanese firms based out of Shanghai would be the biggest winners. However, even for Guangdong-based firms the savings on transshipment fees levied by Hong Kong alone could total about NT$750 billion (US$22 billion) per annum, according to Day Sheng-tung, chairman of Taiwan's National Association for Small and Medium Enterprises. The port of Kaohsiung would also receive a welcome boost from direct transport links. Largely because of the ban it has become increasingly sidelined by Hong Kong and Shanghai as a shipping hub.

The impact of direct Shanghai-Taipei flights would be even greater. About half a million Taiwanese live in Shanghai, making the Shanghai-Hong Kong-Taipei route one of the most profitable and busiest air routes in Asia. The current journey time of nearly six hours via Hong Kong would be slashed to just 90 minutes. This not only would have obvious benefits from a time perspective but there would also be a number of other important effects. It would allow regular cross-Strait commuting for senior Taiwanese management. Currently they must relocate to the mainland to oversee their mainland operations; this has aggravated perceptions of a brain-drain from Taiwan to China - especially in the important information-technology (IT) research and development (R&D) sector.

Direct transport links would presumably also work both ways, allowing mainland Chinese to travel to Taiwan far more easily. This would be welcomed by Taiwanese firms as it would allow them to expose mainland staff to Taiwanese corporate culture more easily. However, the biggest impact would be on Taiwan's tourism industry, as the recent relaxing of Chinese regulation on individual tourist trips to Hong Kong has shown with its huge boom in mainland visitors.

Yet many Taiwanese remain skeptical, fearing that direct transport links would open the floodgates to a hollowing-out of Taiwanese industry to the mainland and as first steps in Beijing's aim of reunification. As former Taiwanese president Lee Teng-hui thundered recently, "If we keep strengthening the economic ties and integration between Taiwan and China ... this nation will slump." Chen therefore has gone out of his way to paint cross-Strait ties as "one country on either side of the Strait" as opposed to Beijing's "one China" mantra.

The "hollowing out" fear is palpable in Taiwan with Beijing's shift from a military reunification strategy to one by economic integration. Hollowing-out has hit Taiwan's service and financial industry far harder than manufacturing, generally perceived as the phenomenon's main victim. Ironically, this has been principally due to the ban on direct links. Taiwan's banks are prevented from providing financial services to Taiwanese firms' mainland operations, depriving them of a huge source of revenue and aggravating the woeful state of their balance sheets. Direct transport links would put pressure on Taipei to reassess the lack of direct financial links and potentially open up new markets for them.

Manufacturing's wholesale exodus from Taiwan to mainland China would also be unlikely with the establishment of direct transport links. More likely is the consolidation in division of labor between the two sides that is already under way. Taiwan's information technology industry is a good example of this. In the early 1990s its main focus was on manufacturing monitors, desktops and motherboards. These functions have long shifted to the mainland, to be replaced by the manufacturing of laptops and LCD (liquid crystal display) screens. Meanwhile, Taiwan's IT research and development (R&D) sector looks set to capture increasingly bigger market shares in semiconductor design. Taiwanese manufacturing is moving up the food chain in classic style and its R&D sectors are unlikely to be easily replicated on the mainland.

Unfortunately, the big wrench in the works is whether Beijing would accept Chen's vision for direct transport links. Judging by the reception of state Chinese media, which promptly savaged Chen and his offer as "insincere" and a "gimmick", this seems unlikely. Until Chen accepts Beijing's "one China" principle, any movement on cross-Strait issues is unlikely, no matter how optimistic Chen may appear. Then again the direct-transportation issue may well be a tool for Chen to get Beijing to accept his one-country-on-each-side approach and a rejection by Beijing could be used by the DPP to denounce China as unreasonable and bolster his election campaign.

Until then, anybody facing the current six-hour flight from Taipei to Shanghai is probably well advised to buy a good book for the journey.

(Copyright 2003 Asia Times Online Co, Ltd. All rights reserved. Please contact content@atimes.com for information on our sales and syndication policies.)
 
Aug 28, 2003



Is Taiwan hollowing out?
(Jul 26, '03)

Cross-Strait flights: Move over, Lindbergh
(Jan 28, '03)

Machiavellian moves on Cross-Strait links
(Nov 9, '02)

China reaches across the Strait
(Oct 19, '02)
Affiliates
Click here to be one)
 


   
         
No material from Asia Times Online may be republished in any form without written permission.
Copyright 2003, Asia Times Online, 4305 Far East Finance Centre, 16 Harcourt Rd, Central, Hong Kong