Search Asia Times

Advanced Search

 
China

COMMENT
Chinese athlete: 'I owe it to the party'
By Li YongYan

BEIJING - "I owe my Olympic gold medal to my parents, my coach and, above all, to the wise leadership of the Republican Party and President Bush." Can anybody imagine such a remark from an American athlete speaking to Fox News Network? Of course not. Not even the irreverent, wise-cracking talk show host Jay Leno has such a fertile imagination.

But when it comes to Chinese athletes, this extravagant tribute to the political leadership of a country is anything but fictional in the 28th Olympic Games now under way in Athens. The minute a young Chinese girl bagged the gold medal in the women's table-tennis singles final on Sunday, a Beijing TV network reporter stuck a microphone under the nose of her parents. The father, without batting an eye, told the audience that his good daughter was a good Communist Party member and her success was a tribute to the party organization. We can only imagine the hyperbolic tributes, straining credulity, when Beijing hosts the 2008 Summer Olympics.

For all intents and purposes, he is right: the government and the Communist Party own all the Chinese athletes. They are trained, funded, and sent to the Olympics in Greece and to other sporting events by the China Sports Bureau, a cabinet-level ministry in the government. By international standards, the party trains them well: as of Wednesday, China was No 2 in overall medal earnings: 51 total, including 24 gold, 15 silver and 12 bronze (the US had 71 overall, including 25 gold, 27 silver and 19 bronze).

And the government treats its athletes well, too. Each gold medalist will receive 200,000 yuan (US$24,000) in reward money, or 23 years' worth of an average Beijinger's annual income, when he or she returns home, because such athletes have repaid the party's kindness by, as the grateful father put it, "bringing glory to the party and country".

Everybody knows that with a few exceptions, competition sports is an expensive activity that requires huge amounts of money but generates little if any revenue. Yet Beijing still retains full monopoly on this costly endeavor. Why in the world is the Chinese government, galloping on the capitalist road, willing to go to such expenses when it is now allowing private and even foreign ownership in most industries? The monopoly on such industries as telecommunications, aviation, postal service and defense is easier to understand: national security and high profit margin are the two chief motivations. But figure-skating and weightlifting never come close to making money or contributing to territorial integrity by any stretch of imagination.

The answer lies in history. Not unlike Adolf Hitler, who mixed a heavy dose of Nazi propaganda into the 1936 Berlin Olympics, China's association with sports has always been closely intertwined with politics. During the Mao Zedong years, Beijing boycotted every international sports event, refusing to share the same venue with fellow Chinese across the Taiwan Strait or its ideological enemies from the West. In its few staged sports events, participants were invited from Third World countries, all expenses paid by China's government. These "friends" had no skills; no problem. Chinese table-tennis players were ordered to strike the ball into the net so that each invitee would win a title or two. The government let it be known that the games were inversely rigged. "Friendship First, Competition Second" was the theme of such "Friendship Games". Problem was, many self-respecting athletes from Asian, African and Latin American countries felt manipulated and insulted by being given medals they had not earned. Belatedly, China realized that it couldn't buy or give away friendships.

With the opening of China since the late 1970s, sports and friendship took a back seat as the country was occupied with more pressing needs, such as abolishing the bankrupt commune system of agriculture and reforming the bleeding industries. Then something unexpected happened in the early 1980s. China's women's volleyball team, out of sheer determination and hard work, overcame seemingly unbeatable odds and clinched three consecutive world titles over three years - the World Cup, the World Championship and the 1984 Los Angeles Olympics.

It so inspired the politics-weary Chinese that some impressionable students took to the Beijing streets in celebration and hailed the victories as a "stimulus to revitalizing the Great China". The political significance was not lost on veteran propagandists who had been scratching their heads in search of the next bonanza. To their delight, they found that an athletic achievement served both to provide a convenient outlet for popular discontent with society and an emotional adhesive for nationalist unity.

After the death of Mao and his ideology, nothing has been able to focus the national attention and energy like the sound of China's national anthem in a Western stadium. The way the government media put it, when a red five-star flag is raised, the republic's past humiliation is washed away and replaced with a pride that every Chinese is thrilled to share. The "Sick Man of East Asia" is now strong, is fast, and stands high and proud. Thus national prestige suddenly finds a new support in the able-bodied, professional athletes - instead of the export of communist ideology.

So the government has increased the budget for competition sports. Untold bucks have poured into those teams that have a good chance of winning a gold medal, in less confrontational fields such as table tennis, diving and gymnastics. Exactly how much is spent on winning the gold medals is never clear. The latest public budget report from the Treasury Ministry is for the year 2000. A total of 2.6 billion yuan ($3.4 million) was allocated to culture, sports and broadcasting. No breakdown is given. With more than 3 billion yuan budgeted for a single Olympic stadium, Beijing certainly knows how to stretch, or cook, the budget. In any event, the government pays all the way, from training, equipment, multimillion-dollar contracts for foreign coaches, fashionable clothes for world tours. So the athletes and their families are telling the truth when they gush about how grateful they are to the party and the state.

If only the sports glory would rub off a bit on the nation as a whole. None of the country's many stadiums and sports centers are open to the public at no cost. That may be understandable from a commercial standpoint, but behind the glittering gold medals and silver trophies lies the less glamorous fact that China is still very sick. As many as 120 million people carry the active hepatitis B virus. Another 5 million suffer from tuberculosis (TB); as many as 150,000 people die from this terrible lung disease each year because they have no access to medication. China's government is doing so little that the world community cannot stand by and simply watch. Since 2002, the World Bank has lent $104 million to aid China's fight against TB. Another $48 million in grants is provided by an international health fund. Even the Japanese government gives $3 million each year to China's 12 provinces for this cause.

Few countries produce as many world-class sports champions as China does, but they have a much healthier population that is perfectly content being a spectator to the Olympics. On the other hand, the impressive records of China's athletes at the Athens arena will not help improve the life of the masses who have neither physical prowess nor fitness back at home. East Germany and the former Soviet Union were both big achievers in sports events. And where are these gold-plated countries now?

Li YongYan is an analyst of Chinese business, economy, politics and social trends.

(Copyright 2004 Asia Times Online Ltd. All rights reserved. Please contact content@atimes.com for information on our sales and syndication policies.)


Aug 26, 2004



How India keeps its athletes off the podium

The five-ring circus (Aug 20, '04)

Indonesia switches off Olympics, politics
(Aug 18, '04)

 


   
         
No material from Asia Times Online may be republished in any form without written permission.
Copyright 2003, Asia Times Online, 4305 Far East Finance Centre, 16 Harcourt Rd, Central, Hong Kong