WRITE for ATol ADVERTISE MEDIA KIT GET ATol BY EMAIL ABOUT ATol CONTACT US
WSI
Asia Time Online - Daily News
             
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese



    Greater China
     Feb 5, 2005
SINOROVING
The emperor's new clothes
By Pepe Escobar

PART 1: The Great Wall of Shopping
PART 2: Selling China to the World
PART 3: The hottest label: China chic
PART 4: Tiananmen peasant time bomb
PART 5: Guangdong, unstoppable world's factory
PART 6: Never mind the party, let's party!

BEIJING - The National People's Congress - "the highest organ of state power" according to China's constitution - convenes the third session of its 10th edition next month. With its 3,000-odd delegates the NPC, theoretically based on popular sovereignty, may be only an instrument to legitimize one-party rule. Anyway, the whole world will be examining every word and gesture to assess how China is imposing the rule of law, fighting economic inequality and following the new party slogans, "sustainable development" and "people-based governance".

In December, President Hu Jintao went to Macau to celebrate the fifth year of the territory's handover from Portugal. In Macau and Hong Kong this was interpreted as a dress rehearsal to highlight Hu's overwhelming dominance of domestic policy ahead of the NPC session. As China enters the Year of the Rooster, Hu seems more than ever to be a tiger - not a dark horse, according to Beijing rumor. One thing is certain: he definitely won't be a Mandarin-dubbed Mikhail Gorbachev.

European diplomats in Beijing agree that Hu has wholly asserted his authority over the third generation's Jiang Zemin (former party chief, president and military commander) in the Politburo Standing Committee (although five of the nine men in dark suits are Jiang's allies). Hu has ordered a crackdown against any kind of dissent by public intellectuals, democracy, labor and rural rights activists, and 'Net surfers; and with the publication of the 85-page 2004 Defense White Paper - which calls for a non-nuclear China but warns that the military tolerates "no separatists" (a message to Taiwan) - he has the military on his side. As Chen Zhou, a researcher at the Chinese Academy of Military Sciences, highlights, "this is the first time the Defense White Paper has clearly expressed our security concerns, demonstrating the new leadership's collective strategic judgment". "Fighting separatism" - meaning independence movements in Taiwan, Tibet and Xinjiang - is the first priority of the first order of priorities.

Hu are you, Hu Jintao?
Those who knew something about the man could have seen it coming - the dark horse turning into a tiger. The inestimable Disidai, the book on the fourth generation published in 2002 under the pseudonym Zong Hairen, defines composed, controlled and consensus-prone Hu as the "consummate Chinese communist organization man". His mentor was Gansu province Communist Party secretary Song Ping, a very conservative economic planner. Career-wise though, Hu's record as party secretary both in Guizhou and then in Tibet is alarmingly mediocre - especially in Tibet.

In January 1989, the Panchen Lama (considered by many the No 2 figure in Tibetan Buddhism after the Dalai Lama) died. Lhasa was in turmoil for the next two months. Hu had just been transferred, and knew nothing about Tibetan culture and politics, not to mention his lack of local connections. In early March that year, the local-government chairman - who was subordinated to Hu - declared martial law, following a strict order from Beijing. Little did anybody know that the same would happen in Tiananmen Square two and a half months later.

Hu's views on Tibet say a lot about the man. He is basically waiting for the Dalai Lama to die so Beijing can deal with a more pliable leader (as for Xinjiang, he favors even more repression: "We can realize political stability, economic prosperity and long-term social order ... only if we take hold of this 'ox's nose'"). The five stars in the Chinese flag are said to represent the Han, Manchu, Hui, Tibetan and Uighur ethnic groups, but the unabashed ethnocentrism of the Han in power means that real independence for Tibet and Xinjiang is anathema.

Hu's mediocre record in Tibet is a direct consequence of his spending at least five months a year in Beijing, networking with his mentor Song Ping. His excuse was that his body was not strong enough to stand the altitude and the harsh climate. But the networking paid off handsomely, because in 1992 Hu, thanks to Ping, made it to the Politburo Standing Committee. From then on, he was always very clever - always projecting an image of being patient and modest, and never making enemies. He always deferred to Jiang Zemin - until he rose to power.

Compare this to Premier Wen Jiabao. Wen was Chinese leader Zhao Ziyang's right-hand man during the Tiananmen pro-democracy demonstrations in 1989. Zhao, as we know, was purged for his "serious mistakes". But Wen was "rectified" because he engaged in prolonged self-criticism; he later became an expert in economics, the sure-fire way to advance one's career in the booming Jiang Zemin era. Today, Wen may not be as protected as Hu because the vice premiers breathing down his neck are staunch Jiang allies: Executive Vice Premier Huang Ju (in charge of fiscal and financial issues), and Zeng Peiyan (in charge of state investments in industry and infrastructure). This means they will do their utmost to protect large state-owned enterprises (SOEs), state banks and industrial ministries from any streamlining. But the crucial point is that Hu and Wen converge on the essential: the party must concentrate on ideological and political training and promote cadres who are as ideologically "pure" as they are technically competent.

The Little Helmsman Deng Xiaoping coined the immortal slogan "to get rich is glorious". Jiang Zemin coined his "Three Represents" (the party has to appeal not only to peasants and workers, but to the middle class). Hu has no ideology - yet, apart from extreme loyalty to the party, and doing anything to protect its hegemony. But diplomats in Beijing hint that he may be on to something. In 2000, Hu ran Jiang's Three Represents campaign - which in essence called for a more "bourgeois" party. He may be undoing it now with his emphasis on "people-based governance".

How the party pulled it off
Confucian scholars in classical China, when they had to answer a very difficult question, always had an exit strategy: que yi, which means "leaving the question answerless".

Que yi may apply to the question of where does the party go now. After conversations with a number of intellectuals, who must remain anonymous, one learns that que yi certainly does not apply to how the party steered China from "de-Maoization" toward modernization.

The key is that Chinese communism incarnates a revolutionary nationalism. That's how the party has managed to mobilize the whole Chinese nation. In its Little Helmsman-propelled modernization drive, the party made sure that hundreds of millions of peasants remained neutral - and additionally gave the party the number of policemen necessary to the repression apparatus. Then the party won - or won again - the millions of urban workers who started to profit from the economic reforms. The party even managed to seduce some intellectuals. Finally, the new middle class/new bourgeoisie was integrated politically. The Chinese may not love the Communist Party - in essence a giant, secretive organization of 65 million members, but its social base is immense, including everyone from village leaders, factory managers, newspaper editors and university professors to all kinds of bureaucrats in charge of actually running the country.

Now Deng's new model has reached a crossroads - where mind-boggling social dynamism meets social fragmentation and political impasse. Diplomats in Beijing marvel at how the party has been able so far to master all the unpredictable and even volcanic consequences of the reforms. As one of them puts it, "they know they could not exercise total control anymore - ideological, economic and social control. So the totalitarian logic is gone. What remains is the grand design. They may not control the details, but they do control the big picture, and the means to implement their vision. They retain the absolute monopoly of repression mechanisms."

Even positioned to "control the big picture", the party must anyway fight overlapping battles: more and more corruption and abuse of power; the crisis of SOEs; extremely tense labor disputes; rising crime rates; more and more transport and industrial accidents; more and more gangs trafficking in the black economy; the devastation of the environment. The common criticism is always the same, expressed either by a young media professional in Guangzhou or a businessman in Shanghai: "They have a lot of power but they accept very little responsibility."

The challenges
The party is certainly aware of mounting criticism - and intellectuals inside the system are doing their best to identify the problems and prescribe solutions. For example, such people as Li Peilin, deputy director of the Institute of Sociology at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences (CASS), are convinced that "high-speed economic growth in China" (a staggering 9.5% in 2004) can be maintained "for years to come". Li has identified seven social trends in China in 2005:
1) The economy will continue to develop at high speed.
2) After three years in the World Trade Organization, Chinese banks and the auto industry will face most of the new challenges.
3) Faster urbanization: the key, says Li, is "turning farmers into city residents", although he does not recommend how.
4) The aging problem: for the moment there are 130 million Chinese aged 60 or above; only 25% of the labor force is insured.
5) Labor tensions.
6) Increase in education costs.
7) What Li defines as "greater difference in inter-generational value", or the frugal old guard contrasted with the credit consumption of new generations.

A CASS blue paper, "The Analysis and Forecast on the Social Situation of China", goes even further than Li, examining seven "special realities" - different from other developing countries' - necessary for China to solve its "social contradictions":
1) Urbanization must be encouraged: China "should strive to transfer another more than 100 million surplus laborers from rural areas in the coming 15 years".
2) Attention to income inequality: China should "carry out scientific control over income redistribution by the means of finance, taxation and welfare".
3) Better education as the best way to "turn a big country with a large population into a big country with human resources, which is an important link for maintaining economic growth in high speed".
4) A better social-security system.
5) Poverty reduction: "Poverty-reducing project should be carried out with integrating investment resources in rural areas in the 11th Five-Year Plan (2006-2010) and a basic frame for rural social security should be formed".
6) Tackling corruption "by improving a socialist democratic system" and "improving technical levels in social management".
7) "China should keep a cool head and deal with international relations well, especially the international relations between big powers."

After their annual planning session last September, the fourth generation acknowledged in public that the "life and death of the party" depend on "improving governance" - which means fighting corruption among party officials. But the problem is the system itself. If you are a Chinese farmer or a worker, the only way to complain about an abuse is to resort to the old imperial system of petitions and appeals. According to a new survey by another CASS sociologist, Yu Jianrong, petitions to the central government increase about 50% year-on-year, but only one-200th of 1% of the people who use the system say it really works.

Intellectual deprivation
Hu's recent crackdown on public intellectuals, extensively documented by Asia Times Online's Chinese writers, is intimately connected to the party's obsession, after Zhao Ziyang's death, to squash any possibility of popular, democratic demonstrations.

For millennia, the role of critical intellectuals in China has been to enlighten the ruler. Now, under "market socialism", they may be a dying breed. Many have decided to follow James Joyce's motto - silence, exile, cunning. This more than suits the party, which is very comfortable with the emergence of an uncritical middle class that may in the future make dumbed-down choices and believe, just as in the United State, that they are living in a democracy. Anyway, the party line is that China already has a "democracy with socialist characteristics" and people largely support the party; moreover, there would be no need for elections because the peasant masses.

European diplomats in Beijing confirm that the fourth generation is positively alarmed by the possibility of a democratic domino effect across Eurasia after the (orange) Ukrainian and (velvet) Georgian "revolutions". No wonder: Kyrgyzstan, which borders China, may be the next in line. The Central Asian republics are members of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, which is led by China and Russia: the main item in the SCO's agenda is to fight Islamic terrorism. Now we see the possibility of a democratic virus - not Islamic terrorism - "infecting" western China (Xinjiang) from Central Asia. It's all there in a now-famous editorial in the People's Daily early last month warning that "hostile forces have not abandoned their conspiracy and tactics to Westernize China and to divide up the country".

The party sees it as another Washington plot. Thus Hu's crackdown against public intellectuals, writers and journalists will remain in effect. This means, among other things, that the Chinese blogosphere will not shake up the party's foundations any time soon - as most 'Net surfers admit in private. The fourth generation is confident that the security agencies can threaten, jail or exile anyone who even implicitly campaigns against the party. And to a large extent because of the Great Firewall of China, urban media professionals confirm that the majority of the voices in Chinese forums and chat rooms are fiercely nationalistic - more anti-American, more anti-Japanese and more war-against-Taiwan than the party itself.

Rabbits, horses, tigers, dragons
Manchu master toymaker Tang Qi-liang is a Beijing treasure. He's still selling his beautiful clay and paper toys in a small shop on Imperial College Street, near the Confucius temple. A crowd favorite is Lord Hare, a rabbit demigod who lived with Chang'e, the goddess of the moon, and was sent by the goddess, riding a tiger, to deliver medicine to citizens of Beijing victims of a great plague. Lord Hare looks like a really pissed-off rabbit on top of a pissed-off tiger. But looks are deceiving: he's an agent of Good.

Hu Jintao may look like a (dark) horse of democracy when he's in fact a crouching tiger. There's hardly any evidence that a hidden dragon - like the members of the house of flying daggers who defied the last days of the Tang Dynasty, the theme of a splendid Zhang Yimou film - will appear to confront him. The only possible contender from the inside is Zeng Qinghong, the No 5 in the Politburo Standing Committee. According to Beijing insiders, he would reverse the official condemnation of Tiananmen as a "counterrevolutionary rebellion"; he would allow elections at the county level; and he would even allow independent political parties and non-censored media. Zeng is the man to watch. Few, though, bet on a palace coup with Zeng replacing Hu.

The consensus in Beijing is that Hu believes China is too complex and turbulent to be governed by democracy. He believes China needs strong leadership to conduct both domestic development and foreign policy. He believes China still needs an emperor - not a Gorbachev. So the emperor will remain fully clothed in his made-in-China dark suit.

(Copyright 2005 Asia Times Online Ltd. All rights reserved. Please contact us for information on sales, syndication and republishing.)


China faces growing unrest (Nov 16, '04)

Scrapping safety valve petition could backfire (Nov 11, '04)

Hu's kinder face
(Nov 3, '04)

The center cannot hold (Jul 17, '04)

China ready for democracy in 1940s, not today
(May 11, '04)

 
 

All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
© Copyright 1999 - 2005 Asia Times Online Ltd.
Head Office: Rm 202, Hau Fook Mansion, No. 8 Hau Fook St., Kowloon, Hong Kong
Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110

Asian Sex Gazette  China Sex News