|
SPEAKING
FREELY Civil society groups rely on
Beijing By Yiyi
Lu
Speaking Freely is an Asia Times
Online feature that allows guest writers to have
their say. Please click here
if you are interested in
contributing.
On hearing that this
writer has been studying Chinese non-governmental
organizations (NGOs), people encountered outside
China usually have two reactions. Either they will
ask with incredulity: "Are there any NGOs in
China?" Or they will assume that Chinese NGOs are
no different from NGOs in other countries,
therefore, they will ask how Chinese NGOs cope
with the challenges commonly faced by NGOs
elsewhere, such as how to maintain their
independence and how to mobilize popular support
for their campaigns against the bad polices or
behavior of the government.
Both reactions
stem from a lack of understanding of the situation
of contemporary China. Although it is still a
communist country, it is no longer ruled by a
totalitarian state that leaves no space for
autonomous social action. Many NGOs are active in
China today. They address a wide range of issues
and represent diverse constituencies. Hotlines for
victims of domestic violence, residential homes
for disabled people, rural development
associations implementing micro-credit schemes,
clubs of environmental activists, self-help groups
formed by people living with HIV/AIDS, and legal
service centers for women and children have sprung
up all over the country in the last two decades.
They provide much-needed services where none
existed before, raise public awareness of
important issues, and help push the government
to provide better care and protection for
vulnerable and disadvantaged members of society.
On the other hand, Chinese NGOs
often operate in a way that is very different from
NGOs in most other places. While NGOs elsewhere
often consider independence from the government
as essential to their ability to fulfill their
basic functions, many Chinese NGOs view close ties
to the government not as a problem but as
an invaluable asset. They invest great effort
in establishing such ties. Instead of worrying that
a cosy relationship with the government will
reduce public trust in them, they think it will
enhance their ability to attract popular support.
A dependent relationship with the
state Chinese NGOs have good reasons for
thinking this way. Although the state has
substantially reduced its control over the economy
and society after more than 20 years of reform,
it remains the dominant force in Chinese
economic and social life. NGOs cannot operate
without receiving various forms of crucial support
from the state or its agents. For example, because
a system of "rule of law" has yet to be fully
established in China, NGOs cannot rely on the
legal system for protection if subjected to
obstruction or arbitrary sanctions by government
agencies or officials. Therefore, it is important
for NGOs to cultivate powerful patrons or friends
in the government who can provide them with the
necessary protection should the need arise.
For many years the state has been the sole provider
of social services, and as a result, many ordinary
Chinese people still have more trust in government
service providers than poorly regulated private
institutions. Non-government institutions therefore
need government endorsement to gain public
trust. When NGOs launch fund-raising activities,
the public often suspect that these are
scams aimed at swindling money from them. Again,
NGOs often seek to reassure the public by demonstrating
that they are approved by the government.
The China Youth Development Foundation (CYDF),
a government-backed organization, initially
tried to solicit donations by sending letters
directly to people. Many recipients of such
letters contacted the police, asking them to find
out if this was a confidence game. The CYDF then asked
the People's Daily, the official newspaper of the
Communist Party, to print an advertisement for it.
Thereafter, it never heard of people asking the
police to check it out again.
Because NGOs
are a relatively new phenomenon in China, they are
still a novelty to many people. In the words of
the director of a rural development NGO, many
peasants "do not know there are other
organizations beside the government". To avoid
confusing the peasants, when the staff of this NGO
goes into villages, they simply tell the villagers
that they are from the government's poverty
alleviation office. This NGO also needs to use the
government's administrative system in the villages
to implement its projects, since it only has a
small staff and no organizational network of its
own. Many other NGOs are in a similar situation.
Without the government's assistance, they are not
able to implement even medium-scale projects.
Advocacy with Chinese characteristics
Chinese NGOs' need of government support
does not detract from their ability to carry out
effective advocacy. Rather, it has led to a
particular way of advocacy that relies heavily on
formal and informal ties to the government. When
asked how his organization might influence
government policies on HIV/AIDS, the vice
president of the China Association of STD
(Sexually Transmitted Disease) and AIDS Prevention
and Control (CASAPC), a professor Dai, who gave
only his surname, explained that he was the
director of the Disease Control Department of the
Ministry of Health for 11 years before he retired
and joined the CASAPC.
He is still a leading member
of the Health Ministry's expert panel on
HIV/AIDS. And he is often invited to ministerial-level
meetings where specific policies are
decided. Dai then asked: "If I am able to have
some influence on government policies, is this
because I am a member of the CASAPC, or because
I am a member of the expert panel, or because
I am the former director of the Disease Control
Department?" Apparently, these three identities
and roles from which Dai cannot easily be
separated.
This is a typical example
of how Chinese NGOs take their ideas and concerns
to policymakers in the government. In a similar
case, a legal research center has the ear of the
government because its two directors are renowned
law professors who serve as advisers to the
Supreme People's Court and the Supreme People's
Procurator. Some of their former students already
hold high positions in these two institutions. The
connections of its directors have ensured that the
center has excellent access to the judicial
authorities. It has been invited by the government
to take part in drafting important new laws.
The growing power of NGOs In
recent years, Chinese NGOs have increasingly made
their voices heard on public policy issues. A
high-profile case is the campaign by environmental
NGOs against a hydropower station on Nujiang River
in southwest China. The campaign eventually led to
a written instruction from Premier Wen Jiabao,
urging a more cautious approach toward the
construction of controversial hydroelectric power
stations. As a result, the project was put on hold
pending environmental impact assessments.
This campaign is another good example of
NGO advocacy in the Chinese style. The campaign in
fact started from within the government. Some
officials in the State Environmental Protection
Agency (SEPA) were opposed to the Nujiang project,
but they lacked the power to veto it. Therefore,
they asked their NGO contacts to drum up support
for their position. Since many activists in
environmental NGOs are journalists, they were able
to use the media to attack the Nujiang project and
to mobilize public opinion against it. Throughout
the campaign NGOs worked closely with their allies
in the government. The suspension of the Nujiang
project is therefore as much the victory of one
view in the government over another as the victory
of NGOs over the government.
The
Nujiang project has only been temporarily put on
hold. Even the environmental NGOs leading the
campaign say that eventually the construction of a big
dam on Nujiang is probably inevitable, though the
design may be modified to minimize the negative
environmental impact. However, there is no doubt
that Chinese NGOs are becoming increasingly active
in the public policy arena. One can be confident
that their influence will be felt more and more in
China.
Yiyi Lu is senior
research fellow on China at Chatham House, The
Royal Institute of International Affairs, a
London-based think-tank.
(Copyright
2005 Yiyi Lu.)
Speaking Freely is an
Asia Times Online feature that allows guest
writers to have their say. Please click here
if you are interested in
contributing. |