|
Stocks or real estate for China's middle class?
By Min Xu
China is one of the most savings-oriented nations in the world: total personal
savings deposits amount to over 12 trillion yuan (US$1.48 trillion), or around
50% of income. For thousands of years people have been accustomed to putting
money under the mattress, and the intermediating role of a banking system has
been well suited to the traditional, conservative mentality of saving at a
risk-free rate for the future. This mentality, however, is rapidly changing.
The low savings deposit rates - the one-year deposit rate is now 2.25% and the
five-year rate is 3.60% - give those who are profit-oriented an incentive to
explore alternative investment channels. In addition, a middle class growing in
affluence has emerged over recent years, especially in rapidly developing
coastal cities. It is estimated that 66% of all savings deposits are controlled
by only 10% of domestic depositors. These higher net-worth individuals espouse
the same consumerism pervasive in more developed countries, and are avid
endorsers of Deng Xiaoping's famous expression "to be rich is glorious". They
aspire to the best cell phones, luxury brand clothing and accessories,
automobiles, and high-end homes. They are no longer satisfied with collecting
paltry interest on their bank savings and are hungry for positive real returns
on their assets.
Since the general population is still largely prohibited from exchanging yuan
into foreign currencies, the domestic stock market and the property market have
become the two most viable options for investments. Unfortunately, given the
nascence of both these markets, individual investors lack the sophistication of
those in more developed countries. Their investment horizon is typically short;
they often do not fully understand the product or company they have invested
in; and a "buy-and-trade" strategy is often preferred to a "buy-and-hold"
strategy. These investors tend to follow the bandwagon while making investment
decisions, participating previously in the 1999-2001 stock market bubble and
more recently in the property market bubble.
Over the past four years, the stock market and real estate market in China have
gone in completely opposite directions. Despite robust growth in the economy,
the market capitalization of stocks trading on the Shanghai and Shenzhen stock
exchanges - China's two stock exchanges with over 1,400 listed companies - has
tumbled 45-55% from their peak levels in 2001. The distressed stock market is
the result of the following factors: poor performance of state-owned companies
listed on the exchanges, a lack of information transparency and a sound legal
infrastructure for the securities market, and a significant erosion of
confidence among unsophisticated retail investors who suffered substantial
capital losses.
The real estate market, on the other hand, has flourished. The property market
in Shanghai, one of the hottest in China, grew 60% in 2004 over the 2003 level,
while housing prices have increased 200% over the last two years. This was
partially an adjustment of the imbalance between supply and demand in populated
cities such as Shanghai. Even more importantly, the expansion of the real
estate sector was fueled by commercial banks' lenient lending policy to
developers and individual housing purchasers as well as speculative buying and
trading activities. Despite numerous government measures introduced since 2004
to cool down the property market, the real estate selling price in China is
still expected to grow 8.3% year-on-year in 2005, according to the National
Bureau of Statistics (NBS).
The government's intention in cooling down the housing market is twofold:
first, to prevent a hard landing, and second, to direct capital from the
property market into the stock market. So far, there is little evidence that
the latter shift will materialize. According to a poll of 2,700 small investors
released by Huading Market Survey Corporation in July 2005, 85% of the
investors had lost money in the stock market since the beginning of 2005, and
only 3% intended to invest in equities within the next year.
The stock market
The Shanghai and Shenzhen Stock Exchanges were founded in 1990 and 1991,
respectively. Publicly traded shares received an overwhelmingly positive
response from small domestic investors, who perceived the stock market as a far
superior alternative compared to savings accounts generating miniscule returns.
The lack of alternative investment options and extreme enthusiasm among
unsophisticated investors helped drive the equity market to untenable levels.
Between 1998 and 2000, the market capitalization of tradable shares on the two
stock exchanges almost tripled from 574 billion yuan to 1.61 trillion yuan,
even though the total number of listed companies only increased moderately from
931 to 1,171. The average price/earnings (P/E) ratio of A-shares - targeted
toward domestic investors - on the Shanghai Stock Exchange increased from 34.4
to 59.1 over the same period. Analogous to the Internet bubble in the US in the
late 1990s, this level of overheating in the Chinese equity market was clearly
unsustainable. Furthermore, until 2000, the majority of listed companies were
selected via a quota system, whereby provincial governments negotiated the
quota for the region with the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC),
elected the companies they would like to support, and submitted information
about potential candidates for approval. This process, tightly controlled by
administrative authorities and highly lacking in transparency, has contributed
to the poor quality of many companies listed on the exchanges. Investors, who
once swarmed the flourishing stock market, were disillusioned by the exposure
of fraud and material financial misrepresentation in listed companies.
In April 2001, the share price bubble burst, due to the combination of the
government's announcement of plans to float state-owned shares in the market
and the uncovering of significant fraud in listed companies. This yielded
substantial losses for investors, who have never quite recovered their
confidence in the equity market since then. The market value of tradable shares
listed on the two exchanges declined from 1.61 trillion yuan at the end of 2000
to 1.17 trillion yuan at the end of 2004, even though the number of listed
companies increased from 1,171 to 1,372 over the same period. The total market
value of shares resumed its decline in 2005, to 990 billion yuan.
Currently, the total market capitalization of publicly traded companies amounts
to 3.2 trillion yuan, of which only 31%, or 990 billion yuan, is attributable
to tradable shares. The remaining shares are non-tradable, largely held by the
government. On April 19, the Chinese government announced, for the second time,
plans to float state-owned shares in public companies in order to fund its
social security system. The government had first attempted this program in June
2001, yet revoked its plans after share prices plunged 30% in three months.
The split share structure reform program is to be implemented in three stages.
Four companies were selected for the first stage of the program, each of which
was required to negotiate a compensation plan for shareholders of the tradable
securities. To date, three of the four firms' split-share reform plans have
been approved by the majority (at least two-thirds of voting rights) of holders
of tradable shares, whereas one firm's plan was rejected. The second stage of
the program involves 42 companies, including some of the largest SOEs such as
Baosteel, Yangtze Electric Power, and CITIC Securities. Many of these companies
have already unveiled their compensation plans - typically two to three bonus
shares for every 10 tradable shares held, although some firms have adopted more
complex proposals involving instruments such as warrants. Should the first two
stages of the program succeed, the government will then proceed to deal with
state-owned shares in the remaining companies on the stock exchanges. All new
IPOs and secondary stock offerings of listed companies are suspended until
further notice.
Even though existing owners of tradable shares will be given compensation in
the form of stock or cash, the payout is nevertheless insufficient to offset
the dilution in value from the flotation of state-owned shares. As a result,
stock prices resumed their decline on the exchanges following the announcement
of the reform program. The approval of the plans by shareholders despite the
meager compensation may be attributable to the pressure imposed on fund
management firms, who together hold about 22% of the total market value of
tradable shares, according to Xinhua estimates. They were instructed to "look
at the difficulty the Chinese stock market is experiencing from a rational
perspective" in a meeting with Shang Fulin, chairman of the CSRC on June 5.
In an effort to salvage the depressed stock market, the Chinese government
implemented a series of measures to stimulate demand, including the following:
Individual capital gains taxes on dividends from publicly traded companies were
reduced by 50%
Insurance companies and social security funds were allowed and encouraged to
invest in the stock market
Share transfers from non-tradable share owners to tradable share owners were
exempted from stamp tax
Stock/cash compensation to be received by tradable share owners (due to the
split share reform) were exempted from corporate and personal income tax
Plans to increase the QFII (Qualified Foreign Institutional Investors) quota
from $4 billion to $10 billion to attract foreign funds into the
yuan-denominated securities market were announced
Fund management companies were allowed to use their shareholdings as collateral
for raising capital
Plans to bail out debt-saddled brokerage firms that suffered from a drop in
trading commissions and collectively lost at least yuan 15 billion in 2004,
according to the Securities Association of China, were announced
Listed companies were allowed to buy back tradable shares so as to boost their
share prices
Despite these measures, there are few signs of an imminent recovery. The
Shanghai Stock Exchange Composite Index fell 15% in 2004 and another 17% so far
in 2005. Various surveys conducted by governmental and private statistical
agencies have all pointed to the same conclusion: domestic investors have
little interest in sending their hard-earned money into a downward-spiraling
stock market.
Poor information transparency, liberal tunneling of assets by controlling
shareholders, and significant fraud at listed companies all reduce the quality
of earnings, deterring the rebuilding of investor confidence in the stock
market. Furthermore, there is little protection of investors' rights against
insider trading and fraudulent misrepresentation. Criminal enforcement is often
inadequate, class action lawsuits are prohibited, and so far no civil liability
lawsuit has resulted in an affirmative judgment by a court. Lastly, it is
important to note that China's stock market is still in its infancy. Investors
are very susceptible to joining the bandwagon and trading up and down based on
new announcements, resulting in extreme volatility in the stock market compared
to countries with more mature capital markets. Such speculative behavior is
very momentum-driven in sharp contrast to a long-term buy-and-hold strategy,
hence further depressing a down market.
The real estate market
The decision of the government to phase out free government-owned housing in
the early 1990s initiated the development of China's residential property
market. The creation of a secondary housing market in 1999 facilitated the
trading of real estate, while the grant of permission for commercial banks to
issue individual mortgages increased the affordability of housing for Chinese
natives; both measures stimulated the demand for property. Local governments,
who generate substantial profits from property taxes and land sales, have a
fiscal incentive to encourage the growth of the real estate sector, further
exacerbating the bubble. Between 2001 and 2003, they are estimated to have
received 910 billion yuan from land sales alone, compared to only 6.7 billion
yuan in 1998, according to a government official. Furthermore, over recent
years, foreign capital has also poured into the housing market due to
speculation of a revaluation of the yuan to higher levels. Many domestic
investors followed suit in speculative trading as property prices escalated
without signs of abating, "flipping" apartments within a short period to reap
generous profits. According to estimates, as much as 20% of all properties and
35% of high-end properties in major cities are unoccupied.
The Shanghai real estate market is an indicator of just how overheated the real
estate industry has become over the past few years. The average price of new
residential apartments more than doubled from around 6,000 yuan per square
meter at the end of June 2004 to a high of almost 13,000 yuan per square meter
in February 2005, according to eHomeday, a website registering property
transactions in Shanghai. The abundance of credit offered to housing buyers was
the primary propellant for this rapid appreciation. In 2004, as much as 76% of
new loans in Shanghai were directed to the real estate sector, according to the
People's Bank of China (PBoC).
Since March, the government has introduced the following measures to dampen the
real estate market, with a focus on tightening bank lending and curbing
property trading:
A 10% capital gains tax was imposed on apartments that are "flipped" within two
years of purchase
Interest rates on mortgage loans were increased by 20 basis points
The down payment requirement on mortgage loans was increased from 20% to 30% of
property value
Borrowers were prohibited from taking out second mortgages
Sales tax and property tax on luxury homes in Shanghai was doubled
Plans to supply land for building affordable housing projects were announced
These measures have slowed the increase in property prices. Average housing
prices in 35 big and mid-sized cities rose 8% year-on-year in the second
quarter of 2005, compared to a 12.5% comparable increase in the first quarter
of 2005 and a 14.4% increase in 2004 over 2003 levels. The average price of new
residential apartments has fallen from a high of 13,000 yuan per square meter
in February 2005 to around 7,200 yuan per square meter at the end of July 2005,
based on statistics from eHomeday.
According to a PBoC survey on urban household savings in May 2005, the
percentage of households planning to purchase apartments in the third quarter
of 2005 dropped 290 basis points from the last quarter to 19.1%. However,
although potential real estate buyers may have adjusted their plans accordingly
in the near term in response to tightened measures, this is not an indication
that their interest in the property market has waned. A survey released by the
NBS in July shows that almost 70% of those surveyed believe that housing prices
would keep rising in the future, compared to only 11% who believe that housing
prices would fall.
Alternative investment options
In light of the recent, unfavorable administrative measures targeting the real
estate market, investors are increasingly exploring the options of alternative
products. Treasury bonds, an instrument initiated in 1981, have suddenly become
attractive again, even though the interest rates on these are not much higher
than savings deposits - three-year and five-year rates are only 13 and 21 basis
points higher than their deposit rate counterparts. Savings seem to have flown
into the government bond market instead of the stock market, implying a flight
to quality given the uncertainty of the latter. The PBoC survey on urban
household savings in May 2005 confirmed that 17.3% of those surveyed considered
treasury bonds as the most desirable investment, up 390 basis points from the
last quarter. In sharp contrast, only 5.6% of those surveyed considered stock
investments as the most desirable, down 500 basis points from the previous
quarter.
Investors are also shifting their investments into wealth management products.
Both state-owned banks such as China Construction Bank (CCB) and the Industrial
and Commercial Bank of China (ICBC) as well as private banks such as China
Everbright Bank and China Minsheng Bank have launched products that invest in a
combination of treasury securities, corporate bonds and central bank-issued
commercial paper. The main attraction is the promise of return of principal
plus a profit margin exceeding the deposit rate. CCB, for example, is promising
returns up to 1.7 times the interest paid on ordinary deposit accounts. Foreign
banks, including Standard Chartered, Citibank, HSBC, and ABN Amro have also
forayed into this growing market, targeting the high-income segment of the
population.
Conclusion
The Chinese government will likely maintain its tightened lending measures in
the near term. However, no further dramatic fall in real estate prices is
envisioned, especially as further revaluation of the yuan against the dollar is
widely anticipated. In contrast to the stock market, the supply in the property
market is unlikely to increase significantly, due to land supply limitations
and macroeconomic controls. In addition, real estate is not only an investment
option, but also a necessity for domestic residents, thus demand is unlikely to
suffer from substantial decreases.
If no significant events take place that dramatically increase investors'
confidence in the stock market, the chance of a large shift of funds from the
real estate market into the stock market look slim. Whether the split share
reform will effectively shift control to the owners of tradable shares and
improve future shareholder returns remains a big question mark. As the
reduction of state-owned shares will be a gradual process, administrative
intervention in listed companies' routine operations will probably continue.
Without an effective legal infrastructure for the securities market that
protects investors' rights, the embezzlement of assets by major shareholders
and the disclosure of false or misleading information will prevail. Hence, a
major step to regaining investors' confidence in the equities market is for the
government to stiffen the penalties for fraud and misrepresentation, while
improving the legal environment for civil liability cases.
Another way to revive the stock market would be for the government to impose
more stringent listing requirements for the stock exchanges. Currently, in
order to be listed, companies are required to be profitable for at least three
years; no material illegal activities or financial and accounting
misrepresentation should have occurred within the past three years; and they
have to satisfy certain minimum net asset value and shareholder requirements.
Companies are considered for de-listing when one of these criteria is violated.
Firms that have lost money for two consecutive years are placed on the "Special
Treatment" (ST) list. Those that have lost money for three consecutive years
are labeled as "Partial Transfer" (PT) and are supposed to be de-listed if the
violation is not cured within a 6-12-month grace period. However, in actuality,
very few of the ST and PT stocks have been de-listed. In fact, many investors
have instead pushed such stocks to high levels based on speculation that an
affiliated company, or the government, would bail the company out and cure the
violation of the requirement - a speculation that often came true. Unless the
government endorses the principle of "survival of the fittest" and strictly
enforces delisting requirements, the unprofitable firms will linger on the
stock exchanges.
Notably, between 1995 and 2002, more than 3,600 firms were involuntarily
de-listed on the three US stock exchanges. In contrast, only 21 firms were
de-listed on the two Chinese stock exchanges between 1999 and 2004. This
startling discrepancy highlights the need for more stringent listing
requirements on the Chinese exchanges. For example, market capitalization,
average closing price, and trading volume requirements - currently not in place
for the Chinese stock exchanges - could be introduced; this might substantially
reduce the number of highly speculative stocks listed on the exchanges and help
to weed out bad companies.
As China's economy further prospers, the middle class is poised to grow both in
population and affluence. These investors will continue their pursuit of
improved investment options in line with their risk and return requirements.
They could benefit simultaneously from a well-regulated real estate market and
a well-functioning stock market, as either could promise a return more
profitable than the low bank deposit rate. To resuscitate the equities market,
the government will have to increase investors' confidence by effectively
improving the quality of listed companies, enhancing information transparency,
and revamping the legal mechanism. It should also develop its property market
at a measured pace, promoting the transparency and consistency of real estate
statistics, so that investors can make better, informed decisions about their
purchases.
Min Xu is a Shanghai native and a recent graduate of the MBA program at
New York University's Leonard N Stern School of Business. She has worked in
corporate finance.
(Copyright 2005 Asia Times Online Ltd. All rights reserved. Please contact us
for information on
sales, syndication and
republishing.) |