WRITE for ATol ADVERTISE MEDIA KIT GET ATol BY EMAIL ABOUT ATol CONTACT US
WSI
Asia Time Online - Daily News
             
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese



    Greater China
     Aug 17, 2005

Stocks or real estate for China's middle class?
By Min Xu

China is one of the most savings-oriented nations in the world: total personal savings deposits amount to over 12 trillion yuan (US$1.48 trillion), or around 50% of income. For thousands of years people have been accustomed to putting money under the mattress, and the intermediating role of a banking system has been well suited to the traditional, conservative mentality of saving at a risk-free rate for the future. This mentality, however, is rapidly changing.

The low savings deposit rates - the one-year deposit rate is now 2.25% and the five-year rate is 3.60% - give those who are profit-oriented an incentive to explore alternative investment channels. In addition, a middle class growing in affluence has emerged over recent years, especially in rapidly developing coastal cities. It is estimated that 66% of all savings deposits are controlled by only 10% of domestic depositors. These higher net-worth individuals espouse the same consumerism pervasive in more developed countries, and are avid endorsers of Deng Xiaoping's famous expression "to be rich is glorious". They aspire to the best cell phones, luxury brand clothing and accessories, automobiles, and high-end homes. They are no longer satisfied with collecting paltry interest on their bank savings and are hungry for positive real returns on their assets.

Since the general population is still largely prohibited from exchanging yuan into foreign currencies, the domestic stock market and the property market have become the two most viable options for investments. Unfortunately, given the nascence of both these markets, individual investors lack the sophistication of those in more developed countries. Their investment horizon is typically short; they often do not fully understand the product or company they have invested in; and a "buy-and-trade" strategy is often preferred to a "buy-and-hold" strategy. These investors tend to follow the bandwagon while making investment decisions, participating previously in the 1999-2001 stock market bubble and more recently in the property market bubble.

Over the past four years, the stock market and real estate market in China have gone in completely opposite directions. Despite robust growth in the economy, the market capitalization of stocks trading on the Shanghai and Shenzhen stock exchanges - China's two stock exchanges with over 1,400 listed companies - has tumbled 45-55% from their peak levels in 2001. The distressed stock market is the result of the following factors: poor performance of state-owned companies listed on the exchanges, a lack of information transparency and a sound legal infrastructure for the securities market, and a significant erosion of confidence among unsophisticated retail investors who suffered substantial capital losses.

The real estate market, on the other hand, has flourished. The property market in Shanghai, one of the hottest in China, grew 60% in 2004 over the 2003 level, while housing prices have increased 200% over the last two years. This was partially an adjustment of the imbalance between supply and demand in populated cities such as Shanghai. Even more importantly, the expansion of the real estate sector was fueled by commercial banks' lenient lending policy to developers and individual housing purchasers as well as speculative buying and trading activities. Despite numerous government measures introduced since 2004 to cool down the property market, the real estate selling price in China is still expected to grow 8.3% year-on-year in 2005, according to the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS).

The government's intention in cooling down the housing market is twofold: first, to prevent a hard landing, and second, to direct capital from the property market into the stock market. So far, there is little evidence that the latter shift will materialize. According to a poll of 2,700 small investors released by Huading Market Survey Corporation in July 2005, 85% of the investors had lost money in the stock market since the beginning of 2005, and only 3% intended to invest in equities within the next year.

The stock market
The Shanghai and Shenzhen Stock Exchanges were founded in 1990 and 1991, respectively. Publicly traded shares received an overwhelmingly positive response from small domestic investors, who perceived the stock market as a far superior alternative compared to savings accounts generating miniscule returns. The lack of alternative investment options and extreme enthusiasm among unsophisticated investors helped drive the equity market to untenable levels.

Between 1998 and 2000, the market capitalization of tradable shares on the two stock exchanges almost tripled from 574 billion yuan to 1.61 trillion yuan, even though the total number of listed companies only increased moderately from 931 to 1,171. The average price/earnings (P/E) ratio of A-shares - targeted toward domestic investors - on the Shanghai Stock Exchange increased from 34.4 to 59.1 over the same period. Analogous to the Internet bubble in the US in the late 1990s, this level of overheating in the Chinese equity market was clearly unsustainable. Furthermore, until 2000, the majority of listed companies were selected via a quota system, whereby provincial governments negotiated the quota for the region with the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC), elected the companies they would like to support, and submitted information about potential candidates for approval. This process, tightly controlled by administrative authorities and highly lacking in transparency, has contributed to the poor quality of many companies listed on the exchanges. Investors, who once swarmed the flourishing stock market, were disillusioned by the exposure of fraud and material financial misrepresentation in listed companies.

In April 2001, the share price bubble burst, due to the combination of the government's announcement of plans to float state-owned shares in the market and the uncovering of significant fraud in listed companies. This yielded substantial losses for investors, who have never quite recovered their confidence in the equity market since then. The market value of tradable shares listed on the two exchanges declined from 1.61 trillion yuan at the end of 2000 to 1.17 trillion yuan at the end of 2004, even though the number of listed companies increased from 1,171 to 1,372 over the same period. The total market value of shares resumed its decline in 2005, to 990 billion yuan.

Currently, the total market capitalization of publicly traded companies amounts to 3.2 trillion yuan, of which only 31%, or 990 billion yuan, is attributable to tradable shares. The remaining shares are non-tradable, largely held by the government. On April 19, the Chinese government announced, for the second time, plans to float state-owned shares in public companies in order to fund its social security system. The government had first attempted this program in June 2001, yet revoked its plans after share prices plunged 30% in three months.

The split share structure reform program is to be implemented in three stages. Four companies were selected for the first stage of the program, each of which was required to negotiate a compensation plan for shareholders of the tradable securities. To date, three of the four firms' split-share reform plans have been approved by the majority (at least two-thirds of voting rights) of holders of tradable shares, whereas one firm's plan was rejected. The second stage of the program involves 42 companies, including some of the largest SOEs such as Baosteel, Yangtze Electric Power, and CITIC Securities. Many of these companies have already unveiled their compensation plans - typically two to three bonus shares for every 10 tradable shares held, although some firms have adopted more complex proposals involving instruments such as warrants. Should the first two stages of the program succeed, the government will then proceed to deal with state-owned shares in the remaining companies on the stock exchanges. All new IPOs and secondary stock offerings of listed companies are suspended until further notice.

Even though existing owners of tradable shares will be given compensation in the form of stock or cash, the payout is nevertheless insufficient to offset the dilution in value from the flotation of state-owned shares. As a result, stock prices resumed their decline on the exchanges following the announcement of the reform program. The approval of the plans by shareholders despite the meager compensation may be attributable to the pressure imposed on fund management firms, who together hold about 22% of the total market value of tradable shares, according to Xinhua estimates. They were instructed to "look at the difficulty the Chinese stock market is experiencing from a rational perspective" in a meeting with Shang Fulin, chairman of the CSRC on June 5.

In an effort to salvage the depressed stock market, the Chinese government implemented a series of measures to stimulate demand, including the following:

  • Individual capital gains taxes on dividends from publicly traded companies were reduced by 50%
  • Insurance companies and social security funds were allowed and encouraged to invest in the stock market
  • Share transfers from non-tradable share owners to tradable share owners were exempted from stamp tax
  • Stock/cash compensation to be received by tradable share owners (due to the split share reform) were exempted from corporate and personal income tax
  • Plans to increase the QFII (Qualified Foreign Institutional Investors) quota from $4 billion to $10 billion to attract foreign funds into the yuan-denominated securities market were announced
  • Fund management companies were allowed to use their shareholdings as collateral for raising capital
  • Plans to bail out debt-saddled brokerage firms that suffered from a drop in trading commissions and collectively lost at least yuan 15 billion in 2004, according to the Securities Association of China, were announced
  • Listed companies were allowed to buy back tradable shares so as to boost their share prices

    Despite these measures, there are few signs of an imminent recovery. The Shanghai Stock Exchange Composite Index fell 15% in 2004 and another 17% so far in 2005. Various surveys conducted by governmental and private statistical agencies have all pointed to the same conclusion: domestic investors have little interest in sending their hard-earned money into a downward-spiraling stock market.

    Poor information transparency, liberal tunneling of assets by controlling shareholders, and significant fraud at listed companies all reduce the quality of earnings, deterring the rebuilding of investor confidence in the stock market. Furthermore, there is little protection of investors' rights against insider trading and fraudulent misrepresentation. Criminal enforcement is often inadequate, class action lawsuits are prohibited, and so far no civil liability lawsuit has resulted in an affirmative judgment by a court. Lastly, it is important to note that China's stock market is still in its infancy. Investors are very susceptible to joining the bandwagon and trading up and down based on new announcements, resulting in extreme volatility in the stock market compared to countries with more mature capital markets. Such speculative behavior is very momentum-driven in sharp contrast to a long-term buy-and-hold strategy, hence further depressing a down market.

    The real estate market
    The decision of the government to phase out free government-owned housing in the early 1990s initiated the development of China's residential property market. The creation of a secondary housing market in 1999 facilitated the trading of real estate, while the grant of permission for commercial banks to issue individual mortgages increased the affordability of housing for Chinese natives; both measures stimulated the demand for property. Local governments, who generate substantial profits from property taxes and land sales, have a fiscal incentive to encourage the growth of the real estate sector, further exacerbating the bubble. Between 2001 and 2003, they are estimated to have received 910 billion yuan from land sales alone, compared to only 6.7 billion yuan in 1998, according to a government official. Furthermore, over recent years, foreign capital has also poured into the housing market due to speculation of a revaluation of the yuan to higher levels. Many domestic investors followed suit in speculative trading as property prices escalated without signs of abating, "flipping" apartments within a short period to reap generous profits. According to estimates, as much as 20% of all properties and 35% of high-end properties in major cities are unoccupied.

    The Shanghai real estate market is an indicator of just how overheated the real estate industry has become over the past few years. The average price of new residential apartments more than doubled from around 6,000 yuan per square meter at the end of June 2004 to a high of almost 13,000 yuan per square meter in February 2005, according to eHomeday, a website registering property transactions in Shanghai. The abundance of credit offered to housing buyers was the primary propellant for this rapid appreciation. In 2004, as much as 76% of new loans in Shanghai were directed to the real estate sector, according to the People's Bank of China (PBoC).

    Since March, the government has introduced the following measures to dampen the real estate market, with a focus on tightening bank lending and curbing property trading:
  • A 10% capital gains tax was imposed on apartments that are "flipped" within two years of purchase
  • Interest rates on mortgage loans were increased by 20 basis points
  • The down payment requirement on mortgage loans was increased from 20% to 30% of property value
  • Borrowers were prohibited from taking out second mortgages
  • Sales tax and property tax on luxury homes in Shanghai was doubled
  • Plans to supply land for building affordable housing projects were announced

    These measures have slowed the increase in property prices. Average housing prices in 35 big and mid-sized cities rose 8% year-on-year in the second quarter of 2005, compared to a 12.5% comparable increase in the first quarter of 2005 and a 14.4% increase in 2004 over 2003 levels. The average price of new residential apartments has fallen from a high of 13,000 yuan per square meter in February 2005 to around 7,200 yuan per square meter at the end of July 2005, based on statistics from eHomeday.

    According to a PBoC survey on urban household savings in May 2005, the percentage of households planning to purchase apartments in the third quarter of 2005 dropped 290 basis points from the last quarter to 19.1%. However, although potential real estate buyers may have adjusted their plans accordingly in the near term in response to tightened measures, this is not an indication that their interest in the property market has waned. A survey released by the NBS in July shows that almost 70% of those surveyed believe that housing prices would keep rising in the future, compared to only 11% who believe that housing prices would fall.

    Alternative investment options
    In light of the recent, unfavorable administrative measures targeting the real estate market, investors are increasingly exploring the options of alternative products. Treasury bonds, an instrument initiated in 1981, have suddenly become attractive again, even though the interest rates on these are not much higher than savings deposits - three-year and five-year rates are only 13 and 21 basis points higher than their deposit rate counterparts. Savings seem to have flown into the government bond market instead of the stock market, implying a flight to quality given the uncertainty of the latter. The PBoC survey on urban household savings in May 2005 confirmed that 17.3% of those surveyed considered treasury bonds as the most desirable investment, up 390 basis points from the last quarter. In sharp contrast, only 5.6% of those surveyed considered stock investments as the most desirable, down 500 basis points from the previous quarter.

    Investors are also shifting their investments into wealth management products. Both state-owned banks such as China Construction Bank (CCB) and the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (ICBC) as well as private banks such as China Everbright Bank and China Minsheng Bank have launched products that invest in a combination of treasury securities, corporate bonds and central bank-issued commercial paper. The main attraction is the promise of return of principal plus a profit margin exceeding the deposit rate. CCB, for example, is promising returns up to 1.7 times the interest paid on ordinary deposit accounts. Foreign banks, including Standard Chartered, Citibank, HSBC, and ABN Amro have also forayed into this growing market, targeting the high-income segment of the population.

    Conclusion
    The Chinese government will likely maintain its tightened lending measures in the near term. However, no further dramatic fall in real estate prices is envisioned, especially as further revaluation of the yuan against the dollar is widely anticipated. In contrast to the stock market, the supply in the property market is unlikely to increase significantly, due to land supply limitations and macroeconomic controls. In addition, real estate is not only an investment option, but also a necessity for domestic residents, thus demand is unlikely to suffer from substantial decreases.

    If no significant events take place that dramatically increase investors' confidence in the stock market, the chance of a large shift of funds from the real estate market into the stock market look slim. Whether the split share reform will effectively shift control to the owners of tradable shares and improve future shareholder returns remains a big question mark. As the reduction of state-owned shares will be a gradual process, administrative intervention in listed companies' routine operations will probably continue. Without an effective legal infrastructure for the securities market that protects investors' rights, the embezzlement of assets by major shareholders and the disclosure of false or misleading information will prevail. Hence, a major step to regaining investors' confidence in the equities market is for the government to stiffen the penalties for fraud and misrepresentation, while improving the legal environment for civil liability cases.

    Another way to revive the stock market would be for the government to impose more stringent listing requirements for the stock exchanges. Currently, in order to be listed, companies are required to be profitable for at least three years; no material illegal activities or financial and accounting misrepresentation should have occurred within the past three years; and they have to satisfy certain minimum net asset value and shareholder requirements. Companies are considered for de-listing when one of these criteria is violated. Firms that have lost money for two consecutive years are placed on the "Special Treatment" (ST) list. Those that have lost money for three consecutive years are labeled as "Partial Transfer" (PT) and are supposed to be de-listed if the violation is not cured within a 6-12-month grace period. However, in actuality, very few of the ST and PT stocks have been de-listed. In fact, many investors have instead pushed such stocks to high levels based on speculation that an affiliated company, or the government, would bail the company out and cure the violation of the requirement - a speculation that often came true. Unless the government endorses the principle of "survival of the fittest" and strictly enforces delisting requirements, the unprofitable firms will linger on the stock exchanges.

    Notably, between 1995 and 2002, more than 3,600 firms were involuntarily de-listed on the three US stock exchanges. In contrast, only 21 firms were de-listed on the two Chinese stock exchanges between 1999 and 2004. This startling discrepancy highlights the need for more stringent listing requirements on the Chinese exchanges. For example, market capitalization, average closing price, and trading volume requirements - currently not in place for the Chinese stock exchanges - could be introduced; this might substantially reduce the number of highly speculative stocks listed on the exchanges and help to weed out bad companies.

    As China's economy further prospers, the middle class is poised to grow both in population and affluence. These investors will continue their pursuit of improved investment options in line with their risk and return requirements. They could benefit simultaneously from a well-regulated real estate market and a well-functioning stock market, as either could promise a return more profitable than the low bank deposit rate. To resuscitate the equities market, the government will have to increase investors' confidence by effectively improving the quality of listed companies, enhancing information transparency, and revamping the legal mechanism. It should also develop its property market at a measured pace, promoting the transparency and consistency of real estate statistics, so that investors can make better, informed decisions about their purchases.

    Min Xu is a Shanghai native and a recent graduate of the MBA program at New York University's Leonard N Stern School of Business. She has worked in corporate finance.

    (Copyright 2005 Asia Times Online Ltd. All rights reserved. Please contact us for information on sales, syndication and republishing.)

  • A clearer path ahead for China's banks? (Jul 2, '05)

    China state share sales- shhhh! (Jun 30, '05)

    China's stock market reforms (May 24, '05)

    Domestic threats to China's rise (May 20, '05)

    Four firms to pilot China stock market reform (May 10, '05)

    China moves to cage its rampaging bears
    (Jan 20, '05)

    China's banking system a ticking time bomb
    (Jan 13, '04)


     
     



    All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
    © Copyright 1999 - 2005 Asia Times Online Ltd.
    Head Office: Rm 202, Hau Fook Mansion, No. 8 Hau Fook St., Kowloon, Hong Kong
    Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110