WRITE for ATol ADVERTISE MEDIA KIT GET ATol BY EMAIL ABOUT ATol CONTACT US
Asia Time Online - Daily News
              Click Here
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese



    Greater China
     Sep 15, 2006
Comic relief: Taiwan's latest UN bid
By Craig Meer

TAIPEI - On Tuesday, the latest and perhaps most theatrical of Taiwan's campaigns to join the United Nations was rejected by a committee of the UN General Assembly. It is the 14th year in a row that Taipei's quest to gain UN membership has been defeated.

The application for membership was presented by a group of small nations from Latin America, Africa and the Pacific that still formally recognize the Republic of China (ROC), and met a hostile response from the People's Republic of China (PRC), which



argued, "Taiwan has been an inseparable part of China since antiquity."

This year, Taiwan's Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MoFA) and the Government Information Office (GIO) treated journalists to an especially entertaining display of their public relations know-how, or lack thereof. The theme for the 2006 UN bid, unveiled at a press conference on August 28, was "UNhuman rights" - written backward. Officials said this was intended to provoke the question, "With Taiwan's exclusion, is the UN moving in reverse?"

The head of the GIO, Cheng Wen-tseng, suggested that the mind-bending slogan was inspired by the puzzles of the best-selling book The Da Vinci Code.

Taiwan's official website for this year's UN campaign included other mentally challenging paraphernalia such as an animated welcome page titled "Free Kick" in which the goal shooter in a soccer match, representing Taiwan, attempts to score past opposition players representing the PRC and Resolution 2758. The second of these "soccer stars" represents the General Assembly vote that saw Taiwan thrown out of the UN in October 1971 and replaced by the PRC.

While the average foreign observer could be forgiven for thinking the Taiwanese see marketing their cause as merely one step removed from a Hello Kitty promotion, the topic is deadly serious and passionately felt.

"UN entry is vital for the international representation of Taiwan's 23 million people," Ambassador Lu Qing-long, a MoFA spokesman, said in a telephone interview. "The international community must understand that we are a nation and that we are not simply a province of China. Beijing does not represent us.

"We contribute to the international community, and despite poor recognition abroad, we already give a substantial sum to the international aid pool - around 0.14% of gross domestic product. We are locked out of the global health system [the World Health Organization], and this presents a serious problem in the event of outbreaks of communicable diseases. And finally, it's just not fair. Why should we be excluded? There are so many reasons why we should be allowed to enter the UN," Lu said.

Polls show that the overwhelming majority of Taiwanese agree with this proposition despite their stand on other issues such as independence. Polling conducted over the past decade consistently reveals that more than 80% of the public support Taiwan's annual UN bid.

If Taiwan's bid to join the UN had actually succeeded, it would have done a lot to boost the standing of embattled President Chen Shui-bian. The latest round of a campaign to oust Chen saw 90,000 people hit the streets of central Taipei last Saturday.

The Republic of China was a founding member of the UN, and the reasons for its rejection in the early 1970s are complex - attributable as much to the inflexibility of former president Chiang Kai-shek as to diplomatic maneuvering by the PRC and the United States.

However, the contemporary reason for the island's continued exclusion is simple enough: the PRC has a diplomatic stranglehold on Taiwan and, with a mixture of carrots, sticks and the one-China principle, has reduced the island's international recognition to a fraction of that of a normal state. A grand total of just 24 nations have formal diplomatic ties with the ROC.

"The diplomatic pressure on Taiwan has probably neither increased nor decreased in the last few years, but it is changing, becoming more complicated," said Professor Philip Yang of National Taiwan University.

"There are two aspects to this. The first is a desire [on behalf of the PRC] to isolate or prevent any move toward Taiwan independence. Recent policy, and you can include the Anti-Succession Law in this, has been consistently designed to deny sovereignty.

"The second aspect is the emergence of bureaucratic differences between the PRC's Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Taiwan Affairs Office [TAO]. More recently, these two agencies have been contradicting each other [such that foreign affairs continues a strict policy of isolating Taiwan, while TAO is more liberal], making a response difficult," he said.

Both factors play directly to the reunification-independence debate in domestic Taiwanese politics, Yang suggested, and makes moderation and compromise in cross-strait affairs extremely difficult for local policymakers.

Lu, the MoFA spokesman, said the PRC has been unwilling to entertain any of the standard diplomatic solutions that the UN forged during the Cold War. Both East and West Germany were separate members of the UN before they reunited in 1990; North and South Korea are members today. Nor has it recognized some of the new models that have been applied to non-state actors.

It is ironic that while non-governmental organizations such as the International Red Cross and Greenpeace should enjoy increasing access to the UN system, Taiwan's chances of being accepted in any capacity are diminishing year by year. The PRC's objection to the island being included merely as an observer in the World Health Organization only makes sense if you adopt an 18th-century version of sovereignty, analysts say.

But Taiwan's annual UN bid, with all its ham-fisted PR, is unlikely to stop any time soon.

"The annual campaign to join the UN is a reminder to the world that there is a real problem here that is not going to go away any time soon," said Yang. "In the future, I think that regardless of who's in power in Taiwan, and even if there is some kind of cross-strait deal struck, the yearly routine will continue. This year the government has chosen human rights as the theme for the application. It changes from year to year, but the basic motive remains the same."

So it seems we're due for more theater. Just how long it will continue to be comedy rather than tragedy is probably up to Beijing.

Craig Meer is a freelance journalist who lives in Taipei.

(Copyright 2006 Asia Times Online Ltd. All rights reserved. Please contact us about sales, syndication and republishing .)


Taiwan's Chen feels the pressure (Sep 12, '06)

Time to step aside, Taiwan's Chen told (Jun 7, '06)

 
 



All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
© Copyright 1999 - 2006 Asia Times Online Ltd.
Head Office: Rm 202, Hau Fook Mansion, No. 8 Hau Fook St., Kowloon, Hong Kong
Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110