WRITE for ATol ADVERTISE MEDIA KIT GET ATol BY EMAIL ABOUT ATol CONTACT US
Asia Time Online - Daily News
              Click Here
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese



    Greater China
     Nov 22, 2006
The geometry of Sino-Indian ties
By Jing-dong Yuan

Chinese President Hu Jintao's current visit to India is apparently aimed at warming his country's relations with New Delhi. However, there are still thorny obstacles to overcome for the betterment of political ties. In addition to border disputes and historical distrust, the two countries' bilateral ties are conditioned by the China-India-Pakistan and China-India-US triangular relationships.

Hu arrived in India on Monday to begin a three-day visit that will close a highly taunted "Year of China-India Friendship". But as



the world is becoming increasingly engrossed by the rise of "Chindia" marked by Asia's two rising powers' phenomenal economic growth and political clout, how Beijing and New Delhi manage their bilateral relationship will be critical for regional and global peace and prosperity in the coming years.

Hu's is the first such high-level visit in a decade, a decade that has experienced rapid expansion of ties in political, economic and security spheres, with only a short hiatus of 1998-99 when Sino-Indian relations were estranged in the wake of Indian nuclear tests and New Delhi's using the China threat as the justification for them.

On Tuesday, India and China agreed to a 10-point plan to solidify ties, saying there was enough room to grow together while remaining sensitive to each other's concerns. The move came after a meeting between Hu and Prime Minister Manmohan Singh. One of the points is that the countries double their trade to $40 billion by 2010.

The bilateral relationship has been marked by regular high-level visits, growing cooperation on a range of international and regional issues, and the establishment of a strategic and cooperative partnership for peace and stability. Perhaps most important was the decision in 2003 to designate special representatives in both countries to develop a political framework within which to seek eventual resolution of the boundary issue. During Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao's visit to India last year, the two sides also signed an agreement of guiding principles aimed at settling the their boundary disputes.

The most noticeable progress, though, has been registered in growing two-way trade. From a mere US$117 million in 1987, bilateral trade has grown to $20 billion this year, with the two countries setting a target of $50 billion for 2010. Cooperation has also expanded to include energy, agriculture, education and technology. In July, the countries reopened the historical Nathu La Pass that had been close since the 1962 war to promote border trade further. Beijing and New Delhi reportedly are also exploring the possibility of negotiating a free-trade pact.

The countries have also made progress in the area of defense cooperation. Building on the 1993 and 1996 agreements on maintaining peace and tranquility and developing confidence-building measures in the military field, Beijing and New Delhi have in recent years expanded ties to include port calls, joint search-and-rescue exercises and defense exchanges. Last May, the two countries signed a memorandum of understanding on defense cooperation, an important sign of an improved bilateral relationship.

Hu's visit will be the crowning event to mark a decade of steady improvement in bilateral relations and serve as an impetus for further strengthening ties between Asia's two emerging powers. However, the substance and consolidation of the improving bilateral relationship will have to overcome what I term the four Ts - threat perceptions; territorial disputes; and the two triangulars, ie, China-India-US and China-India-Pakistan.

Despite progress in bilateral relations over the past few years, mutual suspicions remain. Partly this is due to the dynamics of security dilemma and structural conflicts between the two Asian giants. India has watched China's phenomenal growth in economic and military areas with both envy and alarm. The very fact that China continues to lead India on many indicators of power poses a greater threat than its military defeat 40 years ago.
Likewise, China is paying close attention to India's growing military power and its nuclear and missile developments. Beijing is wary of New Delhi's eastward strategy of developing greater economic and military ties with Japan and the countries of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations.

Unresolved territorial disputes continue to be a key obstacle to full normalization of bilateral relations. While both sides agree to a package settlement format through negotiation to arrive at a mutually acceptable resolution, progress remains slow on the specifics after eight rounds of talks between the two special representatives.

The recent remark by the Chinese ambassador to India asserting Beijing's claims to the entire Arunachal Pradesh state has sent what the Indian media describe as ripples of unease, and only highlights the intractable nature of the border disputes. Clearly, final resolution of the issue requires not only political decisions (and courage) at the highest level in both capitals but also the political skills to sell such a resolution to their respective domestic constituencies.

A China-India-US strategic triangle has emerged in that policymakers are increasingly aware of and attentive to policies made in the other two capitals and how these may affect their own security interests. Within this complex structure, China is watching closely the significance and implications of a warming US-India relationship marked by growing defense ties and the nuclear deal. The US administration's efforts to seek a closer relationship with India are seen by Beijing as using India as a counterweight against China's rise.

A stable Sino-Indian relationship requires the effective management of the delicate China-India-Pakistan triangle. Beijing has made greater efforts to address New Delhi's legitimate concerns over Chinese defense ties with Pakistan. While China's neutrality during the 1999 Kargil crisis demonstrates a more balanced Chinese-South Asia policy, that gesture has yet to translate into goodwill and confidence on India's part that the Sino-Pakistani relationship is not targeted at India. Indian security analysts have called Chinese policy an effort to engage India to contain it, citing, for instance, the Chinese role in helping Pakistan construct the Gwadar Port.

Hu's visit to India could inject optimism and high expectations for Sino-Indian relations, but the challenges ahead remain daunting. Leaders in Beijing and New Delhi are content with the current status of bilateral relations because they are stable and provide possibilities for future developments. But remaining in passivity can only move bilateral relations so far. Beijing and New Delhi should work harder to tackle the challenges mentioned above and move the bilateral relationship to a higher plateau.

Jing-dong Yuan is research director of the East Asia non-proliferation program at the Center for Nonproliferation Studies and associate professor of international policy studies at the Monterey Institute of International Studies in California. He is the co-author of China and India: Cooperation or Conflict, 2003.

(Copyright 2006 Asia Times Online Ltd. All rights reserved. Please contact us about sales, syndication and republishing .)


Some redemption for India on China (Nov 17, '06)

India's army digs in over Siachen (Nov 16, '06)

Beijing's growing respect for India (Nov 14, '06)

Delhi divided over Chinese 'threat' (Nov 8, '06)

 
 



All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
© Copyright 1999 - 2006 Asia Times Online Ltd.
Head Office: Rm 202, Hau Fook Mansion, No. 8 Hau Fook St., Kowloon, Hong Kong
Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110