WRITE for ATol ADVERTISE MEDIA KIT GET ATol BY EMAIL ABOUT ATol CONTACT US
Asia Time Online - Daily News
             
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese



    Greater China
     Jan 12, 2007
Page 1 of 2
Nanjing wounds bleed 70 years on
By Ronan Thomas

LONDON - This July, ceremonies in China and intensive coverage by the international media will mark the anniversary of one of Asia's most brutal 20th-century events. Across Asia, this will be controversial, painful and angering. History will be denied and obfuscated by some, used cynically by others to fuel-inject nationalist sentiment.

This year the world will mark the 70th anniversary of the so-called Second Sino-Japanese War, Japan's bid for Asian dominance, starting with its invasion of Chinese territory in 1937 and



culminating in its defeat in the ashes of August 1945.

Above all, the focus this year will be on Nanjing. Japan's actions during the siege and capture of the Chinese city in mid-December 1937 will come under the harshest critical scrutiny. The brutal Rape of Nanking (as the name of the city was then usually transliterated), with the unrestrained butchery by Japanese soldiers of an estimated 300,000 Chinese souls, remains an indelible stain. It continues to affront world history.

These Sino-Japanese wounds still fester 70 years on. On the one hand Chinese are justifiably resentful that Japan's power elites continue to outrage its Asian neighbors by honoring war criminals in Tokyo's Yasukuni Shrine. The teaching of history in most of Japan's schools is light on Japanese war responsibility, to put it mildly.

Some Japanese historians and political figures continue to avert their eyes from atrocities such as that in Nanjing; some even justify the actions vocally. On the other hand, China's remarkable economic revanche and growing geopolitical ambitions make local Asian policymakers fidget nervously. Some Japanese, East Asian and international observers also complain of a growing Chinese nationalism that ignores huge suffering unleashed under communism in the country's recent past.

Roots of a massacre
The motivations for Japan's entry into China in 1937 may be disputed by both protagonists, but the facts played out on the ground are not.

An undeclared war between Japan and Chiang Kai-shek's Nationalist China broke out in July 1937. Between July and November that year, Japan went on to occupy the entire Yangtze Valley and a large proportion of northeastern China.

Yet the roots of the Nanjing atrocity are to be found much earlier. In 1868, as Japan's shogunate ended, the Meiji Restoration unfolded. Under the Emperor Meiji, Japan embraced Western approaches and industrial technologies after hundreds of years of self-imposed isolation. Like Otto von Bismarck's Germany, then an ascending great power, Japan wanted its place in the sun. As the 19th century ended, Japan had begun to emulate other Western powers, particularly the United States and Britain, in terms of defense expenditures.

Tensions with the West increased after the US acquired the Philippines in 1898. Japan's victory in the Sino-Japanese War of 1894, in the 1904-05 Russo-Japanese War, its acquisition of Korea in 1910, and US acquiescence in the division of Manchuria into spheres of influence boosted Tokyo's confidence exponentially. Then came World War I. When an armistice was reached in 1918, the map of regional Asian geopolitics had altered beyond recognition.

Russia was removed as a serious imperial power in Asia for more than a decade. In the inter-war years, after the Washington Naval Conference of 1921-22, Japanese regional power increased still further. It gained former German possessions in China and the Pacific; unlike the European nations, its industrial capacity had been untouched by war and performance was buoyant. Its navy was strong and growing stronger.

With the temporary removal of serious regional rivals, Japan turned unchecked in the late 1920s toward China. Chiang Kai-shek's Kuomintang (KMT) government had just emerged pre-eminent out of civil war and the claims of competing warlords. But his grip was shaky. And it was northeastern China, specifically Manchuria, that appealed most to Japanese nationalists keen to establish their country as a "pure" East Asian hegemon.

Similarly to Adolf Hitler's concept of Lebensraum - a living space for Nazi Germany based on the acquisition of territory and control of other nations' raw materials - a confident Japan viewed a weakened China as an obvious candidate. Japanese nationalism was to trump all other versions in Asia. It began a policy of intervention in Manchuria and Mongolia with loose control from Tokyo. This was to have profound consequences later when Japanese politicians failed to rein in ambitious commanders steeped in martial thinking and catching the national mood at home.

Then the Great Depression intervened. Japan was hit particularly hard as the world economic order crumbled. It was thus, like Germany and Italy, particularly susceptible to the rise of totalitarianism, in Japan's case the warrior code of Bushido updated for the 1930s. Japan saw parallels between itself and Nazi Germany. The die was cast. It was to be expansion or death.
Thus Japanese democracy faltered as the 1930s began. Radical Japanese nationalists carried out political assassinations; officer groups attempted coups d'etat; successive civilian governments fell as the reforms from the Meiji era disintegrated. Inter-service fratricide led to a military takeover; by 1936, civil politicians were being replaced by soldiers. The lure of China now proved irresistible to the new military power base in Tokyo.

Incidents, incidents
Japanese government and military policy toward China in the 1930s was predicated on manufacturing pretexts to subvert Chinese power and slice territory up salami-style. In September 1931, with the so-called Mukden Incident (at today's Shenyang), Japan deliberately sabotaged a section of Manchuria's railway system - operated by Japan under franchise since 1905 - blaming Chinese bandits.

This brazen pretext was the occasion for Japan to seize all of Manchuria during 1931-32, creating a puppet state it called Manchukuo out of what was left, a vassal entity (1932-45) at the head of which was placed the last emperor of China, Pu Yi.

The rout of Nationalist China was only just beginning. From 1931-37, Japanese forces advanced steadily into KMT territory - with international censure but no action. By 1932 a Chinese backlash against Japanese nationals living in Shanghai - the First Shanghai 

Continued 1 2 


Why history matters (Jan 29, '07)

Japan inches toward a full-fledged military (Dec 1, '06)

 
 



All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
© Copyright 1999 - 2007 Asia Times Online (Holdings), Ltd.
Head Office: Unit B, 16/F, Li Dong Building, No. 9 Li Yuen Street East, Central, Hong Kong
Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110