WRITE for ATol ADVERTISE MEDIA KIT GET ATol BY EMAIL ABOUT ATol CONTACT US
Asia Time Online - Daily News
             
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese



    Greater China
     Feb 1, 2007
Page 2 of 2
SPEAKING FREELY
The UN's Ban: The honeymoon is over
By Sunny Lee

have veto powers. Actually, Ban was the only candidate who didn't receive any negative vote from the Security Council members. In other words, Ban got his current post because he fit the profile of the delicate job description that is supposed to offend none.

As a career civil servant, Ban has also proved to be very skillful in dodging controversial questions, and he earned the title of a



"slippery eel" from an American journalist who interviewed him recently only to get frustrated by Ban for his deftly sidestepping contentious questions.

On another occasion, when Ban was asked by a Voice of America reporter to explain why he had referred to President Bush as a "great leader" during his Washington visit on January 16, Ban said he wondered why the question was being asked. "In diplomacy, it is appropriate to address a head of state with due respect ... I hope you understand these diplomatic practices," Ban was quoted as saying.

But it is obvious that Ban cannot continue to use diplomatic evasion on key issues forever. Eventually, as head of the world's largest multilateral organization, he will have to make his positions known on important global issues, even though doing so may cost him some of his supporters.

While there are certainly calculations of national interest among countries that endorsed Ban for the job, it should be pointed out that they also selected him because they trusted him to become a reliable leader on global affairs.

Whether the new secretary general will play the role of a "general" taking charge of the world body or of a "secretary" to certain established interests is something that the rest of the world will be able to see as Ban conducts his work.

Ban, who said he had been inspired by the late US president John F Kennedy to enter public service, is probably not likely to turn out anti-American or lose US favor, as his two predecessors did. But he should demonstrate to the international community that he can, if necessary, disagree with his primary supporters even at the risk of being disfavored. That's how a leader at the world's top body should fulfill his mission.

Recently, the seasoned Ban ran into trouble when he made a comment that seemingly sided with the US in implicitly agreeing on Saddam Hussein's hanging and on the practice of the death penalty, which went against the UN's official stance that opposes the death penalty on human-rights grounds. Ban's answer also sounded contradictory to a statement by the United Nations special representative for Iraq, Ashraf Qazi, who said on December 30, only hours after Saddam was hanged, that the UN could not support the execution.

Faced with international criticism, Ban backed down and made a compromising statement the very next day that he would oppose the execution of Saddam's two top aides.

That may have been a defining moment for Ban, whose political survival instinct is to want to please everyone and insult none. But unfortunately, things don't always work that way. Only a few days later, John Bolton "reprimanded" Ban, saying he shouldn't have backed down from his original stance on the death penalty.

The world watched how the whole incident played out and how Ban conducted himself in the process. China saw it too. On Tuesday, China's state media ran an analytic piece on Ban for the first time departing from its usually congratulatory tone. The World News Journal, a publication arm of the state broadcaster, wrote on why Ban is viewed as a "pro-American" figure.

Clearly, now the honeymoon is over, except in South Korea, where Ban is still hailed as a national hero, and books on him have become best-sellers. Korean police even said they would send a bodyguard for Ban if requested.

But outside Korea, the former Korean diplomat will be pressed harder to show a more principled stance on some of the divisive issues in which different countries have different interests from the world's top diplomat.

It should be worthwhile for Ban to keep in mind Kofi Annan's advice to him during his last days as an outgoing chief: "My only advice to him about this job is to do it his way."

Ban should certainly guard his hard-won new career by trying to work with the US and other major stakeholders that can significantly influence or even jeopardize it. But at the same time, he should keep in mind that he is the secretary general of all the United Nations member states, and not a just the United States.

Sunny Lee is a journalist based in Beijing, where he has lived for five years. A native of South Korea and a former UN intern, Lee is a graduate of Harvard University and Beijing Foreign Studies University.

(Copyright 2007 Sunny Lee.)

Speaking Freely is an Asia Times Online feature that allows guest writers to have their say. Please click here if you are interested in contributing.

 1 2 Back

 

 
 



All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
© Copyright 1999 - 2007 Asia Times Online (Holdings), Ltd.
Head Office: Unit B, 16/F, Li Dong Building, No. 9 Li Yuen Street East, Central, Hong Kong
Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110