WRITE for ATol ADVERTISE MEDIA KIT GET ATol BY EMAIL ABOUT ATol CONTACT US
Asia Time Online - Daily News
             
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese



    Greater China
     Feb 13, 2007
Page 2 of 2
The mystery of China's lost girls
By Kent Ewing

male children, and the practice of determining the sex before birth through ultrasound to produce a ratio of 117 boys per 100 girls under age five. In some regions, the ratio is a high as 130:100. This compares with an average 104-107:100 in industrialized countries.

So where have all the Chinese girls gone?

According to the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS), China's



birth rate in 2005, the last year measured, was 1.24%. That adds up to 16.17 million babies.

Consider, however, the International Planned Parenthood Association's estimate that there are about 7 million abortions per year in China, 70% of which involve females. If the NBS figures are right - and let's hope they are not - that means the abortion rate in China is nearly 30%. It would also mean the 5 million girls aborted last year more than cover the 117:100 gender gap, but that also sounds suspect.

Writing in the New York Times this month, author and adoptive mother Beth Nonte Russell claimed there could be 60 million missing Chinese girls by the end of the decade, 10 million more than accounted for by abortion figures.

What's the truth? Where are all the lost girls - dead or alive? Nobody really knows. But Russell isn't the only adoptive parent who suspects that a lot of them are wallowing in orphanages.

Anyone who has spent time in China's orphanages will tell you that they are full of unwanted girls. Indeed, according to one Hong Kong-based teacher who organizes an outreach program to an orphanage in Guangdong province, any child who is not a girl is likely to be physically or mentally handicapped.

A senior social worker in Guangdong who specializes in orphans and special-needs education confirmed government reports that domestic adoptions are rising while the overseas rate decreases. Curiously, however, she was unaware of the new rules for foreign adoptions.

On the face of it, despite the outrage in the US, the guidelines appear to be supported by accepted international principles. The Hague Convention on Intercountry Adoption, signed by China and 69 other countries, states that all "appropriate measures" should be taken to find an adoptive family in a child's country of origin. If that is not possible, the treaty calls on signatories to ensure that foreign parents provide "for the full and harmonious development" of the child in a "family environment, in an atmosphere of happiness, love and understanding".

China can argue that married couples are better than single parents and that stable marriages are best of all. In addition, parents with financial security, good health and longevity clearly enhance a child's future prospects.

But what if the supply-and-demand argument is only a smokescreen to obscure a brutal side-effect of the one-child policy, which was reaffirmed last month through at least 2010 by the minister for population and family planning, Zhang Weiqing? The government claims the policy has held the country's huge population in check and promoted economic development by preventing 400 million births, but it has also led to millions of abortions and created a perverse boy-girl ratio that demographers translate into 40 million men with no prospect of a partner by 2010.

Moreover, there may be millions of lost girls who foreign parents - whether single, overweight, over 50 or all three in one - say would be better off with them than languishing in a forgotten Chinese orphanage.

"Many of the families I know [now] no longer qualify to adopt," said one California parent who is part of a group of 23 families in her area who have adopted Chinese children. "One has been cancer- free for five years, one is significantly overweight, one had a minor arrest in college, but the one thing they all have in common is that they are amazing parents.

"China says [it is] trying to improve the quality of families adopting. I can understand that, but what I can't understand is why they [Chinese officials] think that a child would be better off in an orphanage. They claim that there aren't enough babies available and this is why the wait has grown, but from what we hear in the US, there are an estimated 2 million babies in orphanages in China. Why are only 10,000 or so being adopted?"

That's a good question, and Beijing should feel obliged to provide a clear answer to the international community.

Kent Ewing is a teacher and writer at Hong Kong International School. He can be reached at kewing@hkis.edu.hk.

(Copyright 2007 Asia Times Online Ltd. All rights reserved. Please contact us about sales, syndication and republis hing.)

 1 2 Back

 

 
 



All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
© Copyright 1999 - 2007 Asia Times Online (Holdings), Ltd.
Head Office: Unit B, 16/F, Li Dong Building, No. 9 Li Yuen Street East, Central, Hong Kong
Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110