WRITE for ATol ADVERTISE MEDIA KIT GET ATol BY EMAIL ABOUT ATol CONTACT US
Asia Time Online - Daily News
             
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese



    Greater China
     Feb 15, 2007
Page 1 of 2
China chokes on Taiwan's history lesson
By Ting-I Tsai

TAIPEI - Political tensions across the Taiwan Strait intensified recently with Taiwan's adoption of revised high school history textbooks which separate the history of the island from that of China. This has prompted Beijing to slam Taiwan's ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) for trying to promote independence among youths.

Taiwan's major opposition Kuomintang (KMT) party has also



denounced the move, saying it will seek a constitutional interpretation on the issue.

The adoption of the new history textbooks is part of an ongoing campaign that includes such things as substituting the world "Taiwan" for "China" on postage stamps and state-owned enterprises, advocated and led by the independence-minded DPP to de-emphasized the island's Chineseness.

The KMT ruled China until late 1949 when it was defeated by the communists in a civil war on the mainland. It then fled to Taiwan to continue its rule under the title of Republic of China (ROC), claiming its sovereign territory covered both the mainland and Taiwan. Consequently, high school geography textbooks have included mainland China and even Mongolia as part of the ROC's territory. And Taiwan's history has been included into Chinese history.

But things began to change after the DPP came to power in 2000. How to describe China and its relationship with Taiwan in the textbooks became not only difficult in practice but also controversial, always sparking fiery political conflicts on the island.

As the incumbent Taiwanese President Chen Shui-bian's term will expire in May, 2008, the DPP administration has been gearing up to drop "China" from the names of state-owned enterprises in favor of "Taiwan" as a way of boosting local identity. The history textbook issue could be seen as a part of this aggressive campaign.

Taiwan's renaming state-owned enterprises has caused Washington concern. In a statement issued last Friday, the Department of State said the United States does not support administrative steps by Taiwan that appear to change Taiwan's status unilaterally or move toward independence, including changes in terminology for entities administered by Taiwan authorities.

In reaction, Taiwan's Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) said on Tuesday that the government's recent move to rename state-owned enterprises is an internal matter which does not involve changes to the cross-Taiwan Strait status quo.

Asserting that any country has the right to change the names of its state-owned enterprises, MOFA spokesman Wang Chien-yeh said the scenario that the United States is worried about has not occurred.

At home, the issue of textbook revision has also been politicized. Supporters argue that Taiwan and China are separate states and the textbook revision will help the island progress into a normal society, while critics say it is simply aimed at promoting Taiwan independence.

In fact, this is not the first time Taiwan has revised its high school history textbooks. Last summer, history textbooks for first-grade high school students were officially separated into Taiwan history and China history. Before then, Taiwan history was contained in a two-volume textbook of Chinese history.

The newly revised textbooks now explicitly distinguish Taiwan from China by using terms like "our country" to denote Taiwan and "China" to denote the mainland, whereas in the unrevised version, China was referred as "the Mainland".

The 1911 Wuhan Uprising led by Sun Yat-sen that toppled the Qing Dynasty now is described as a "disturbance or riot" instead of the original "righteous uprising", and the term "Japanese colonization [of Taiwan]" has been replaced by "Japanese governance".

In last summer's revision, Sun Yat-sen had already ceased to be called "the founding father of the nation" as Taiwan history was separated from Chinese history. But this has also become an issue in the current debate as the new revisions increasingly draw controversy.

For the KMT and mainland China, these changes are not tolerable, even though some of the changes had already been made in the last textbook revision in 1999.

China's Taiwan Affairs Office complained that the changes were in conjunction with the DPP's "Taiwan independence" movement, which are polluting the minds of young Taiwanese. KMT 

Continued 1 2 


China as imperialist; China as colonist (Aug 6, '05)

 
 



All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
© Copyright 1999 - 2007 Asia Times Online (Holdings), Ltd.
Head Office: Unit B, 16/F, Li Dong Building, No. 9 Li Yuen Street East, Central, Hong Kong
Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110