WRITE for ATol ADVERTISE MEDIA KIT GET ATol BY EMAIL ABOUT ATol CONTACT US
Asia Time Online - Daily News
             
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese



    Greater China
     Mar 17, 2007
Page 2 of 2
An interview with author James Mann


China. If you were to reduce your analysis to a one-or-two-sentence question or point for these communities, what would you ask them to think about?

JM: I would ask them to drop or put aside the prediction that political change is inevitable and look at the likelihood of the Chinese system staying as is. I am hoping people will begin to think about American policy and China's future with these things



in mind.

BAS: How would you respond to those who point toward, as one example, the gradual transition of Hong Kong's pre-1970 political system and its incremental accommodation of various reforms with the suggestion that similar gradual changes are taking place in China, and will have similar ultimate results?

JM: Two points: it is always a mistake to draw conclusions comparing Hong Kong to China, just as it is a mistake to compare China with Singapore or South Korea, a point I make in my book. Second, yes, China is allowing small changes in Hong Kong, but the meaning these changes have for China is ambiguous at best. You can see limits to the democratic changes China is going to allow in Hong Kong.

BAS: Is it, in your mind, a situation where the sum of the parts of small changes may not equal the whole of real reform?

JM: Yes.

BAS: It seemed to me that a sub-text of your book is that the world might be selling its soul - looking the other way on basic questions of freedom and liberty - because of the mutual economic incentives that exist between China and the world. Is that correct and, if so, what would such a compromise suggest about US culture and politics?

JM: I don't want to get bogged down in language, but I think "selling its soul" is overstating things. People who believe that an economic relationship will result in liberalization can believe this sincerely, but consequently serve certain business interests. In a larger sense, this shows the American belief that the world wants to become like us and a reluctance on our part to recognize that a country like China is determined to follow its own path. People look at China and assume it will develop just like us.

BAS: If we take your criticism seriously, what types of changes would you suggest policymakers look for within China to indicate which of your scenarios is playing out?

JM: We need to look at the right to dissent. We need to look at the ability of organized political opposition to come together. We need to look at whether judges can be truly independent of the Communist Party. We need to look at controls on the press.

BAS: Should the US focus on holding China accountable to a specific set of reforms beyond the mandatory World Trade Organization compliance items and, if so, what types of reforms do you believe would be most efficacious at drawing out substantive change within China?

JM: These things [business and political change] can run on their own track. There is a strong and legitimate interest by American and other - European and Japanese - countries for China to develop a predictable rule of law and system for dispute resolution. It is not hard for China to set up two tracks of dissent, to focus on the rule of law in a business sense, but not for individuals.

BAS: As someone quite provoked by your cautionary analysis, I finished this book with one looming question: If the current model of "engagement" and "integration" is inadequate (two words you want the US to use carefully), what is the right way to engage China?

JM: I don't have a detailed five-point answer on what our strategy should be. "Engagement" as a concept is incredibly important; of course we should talk to China's leaders, but as a small "e", not a big "E" of engagement. I would like to see America start to have a discussion on what policies we should use and whether we will be comfortable with the possibility of an economically powerful one-party Communist China in 20 years.

Benjamin A Shobert is the managing director of Teleos Inc (www.teleos-inc.com), a consulting firm dedicated to helping Asian businesses bring innovative technologies into the North American market.

(Copyright 2007 Asia Times Online Ltd. All rights reserved. Please contact us about sales, syndication and republishing.)

 1 2 Back

 

 
 



All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
© Copyright 1999 - 2007 Asia Times Online (Holdings), Ltd.
Head Office: Unit B, 16/F, Li Dong Building, No. 9 Li Yuen Street East, Central, Hong Kong
Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110