WRITE for ATol ADVERTISE MEDIA KIT GET ATol BY EMAIL ABOUT ATol CONTACT US
Asia Time Online - Daily News
             
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese



    Greater China
     Nov 2, 2007
Page 2 of 2
Latin America in step with China
By Cynthia Watson

region. Chavez governs a state with a virtual monoculture export economy of a commodity Beijing covets: petroleum. The desire for enhanced military ties clearly appeals to both Venezuela and China.

Venezuela's president wants to achieve autonomy from Washington much as China did in the mid-20th century, and delights in taking highly visible steps to call attention to any ties



with a foreign military that is likely to upset Washington [4]. Beijing wants to open better relations with militaries throughout Latin America with Venezuela currently the easiest to engage.

Chavez has also done everything possible to cut his nation's ties with the US military, including shutting off both PME opportunities and weapons sales; rejecting any guidelines that might allow US assistance; and other overt actions that make Beijing necessary to his military's well-being. At the same time, the United States has become increasingly critical of Chavez's motives and actions. In the Venezuelan case, PLA involvement in the region is as much a result of Chavez's actions as those of Beijing. Instead of China having to assert greater PLA military diplomacy, which risks it being perceived aggressive, it is taking advantage of a set of conditions simply handed to it by the United States and by the Venezuelan leader.

Similarly, Chavez wants to acquire PLA weapons because he refuses to buy from Washington. The weapons purchased by prior regimes in Caracas require replenishment and refurbishment that Washington no longer allows, nor will Chavez request, thus Beijing becomes a logical vendor for Venezuela's needs.

Crucial to evaluating the underlying forces driving Venezuelan-Chinese military ties is understanding that they are much more driven by Venezuelan than Chinese interests. This is an important distinction because it indicates that Beijing is attentive to the Monroe Doctrine in this region. It also testifies to the Chinese awareness of Chavez's unpredictable nature. In the Chinese calculus, Chavez is simply not worth what could become a high cost if PLA involvement became sufficient to arouse Washington's suspicions above a tolerable level.

PLA military diplomacy
Latin America is not the place that China is most interested in today - Beijing's ties and economic stakes in both Africa and Southeast Asia are much more important. Both the continent and the region are closer geographically, more advanced historically and likely to engender greater result for less cost. Latin America does offer a new arena for the PLA and new opportunities for expanded links as Washington remains absorbed in wars in Central and Southeast Asia.

As China seeks to engage Latin America in a multiple-pronged approach, the military instrument's utility is becoming increasingly important for Beijing. Military-to-military ties represent a zero-sum situation from the view of some Latin American militaries, yet if they are involved with the PLA, they need not deal with the traditionally frustrating judgmentalism characterizing long-term links with the US military.

Latin Americans have long memories of inconsistent US policies during the past two centuries. For instance, they have never forgotten the Carter administration's prohibition on military sales to Chile over human rights questions. Few indications exist that Beijing would exercise such judgmentalism except over the Taiwan issue, a matter increasingly going in China's favor as more states choose to shift diplomatic recognition from Taipei to Beijing, as Costa Rica did in mid-2007.

Additionally, as the PLA becomes a modern force, its capabilities will be increasingly able to execute the strategy of forward presence globally, and in a more limited sense with Latin American states. PLA Navy (PLAN) fleet visits, although insignificant relative to those of the US Navy, are increasingly occurring around the world. These drills demonstrate a modernizing fleet's ability to show the flag in a way that was not previously possible.

China's leadership thus garners both increased diplomatic links with states far away and improves PLAN capabilities. As China and the PLA take a more public role in the world, these are increasingly crucial goals for a state seeking respect as a world power.

China's increasingly effective military diplomacy in Latin America also points to a more disconcerting issue, the United States' lack of recognition of the changes occurring while US prestige is waning on the global stage. The traditional US military links with sister armed forces in the region have deteriorated over the past six years, making room for PLA's involvement more visible and effective. PLA diplomacy in Latin America may not in fact be an absolute zero-sum equation for the United States, but reveals the deteriorating US understanding of fundamental global shifts that appear growing systematically.

Notes
1. The region is those states south of the Rio Grande and unlike many other analyses, does include the three European enclaves of Suriname, French Guiana and British Guiana.
2. This phrase is commonly used to denote the period from approximately 1839-1949, when China was subjected to imperialist assault by Western powers and Japan.
3. US PME seats are allocated by invitation, not strictly speaking a competition. The United States, along with other countries, seeks to invite officers from states with whom it wants to enhance overall relations as does China, India, or any other state inviting officers to attend schooling.
4. In the late 1990s, Chavez toured Baghdad next to Saddam Hussein in a highly visible visit that attracted much criticism but accomplished his goal of setting him in the camp opposing US criticisms of the Iraqi dictator.

Cynthia Watson is a professor at the National War College. The views expressed in this article are those of Cynthia Watson, not those of the National War College, Institute for National Strategic Studies or any US Government agency.

(This article first appeared in The Jamestown Foundation. Used with permission.)

(Copyright 2007 The Jamestown Foundation.)

1 2 Back

 

 

 

 
 



All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
© Copyright 1999 - 2007 Asia Times Online (Holdings), Ltd.
Head Office: Unit B, 16/F, Li Dong Building, No. 9 Li Yuen Street East, Central, Hong Kong
Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110