Asia Time Online - Daily News
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese

    Greater China
     Jul 31, 2008
Page 1 of 2
Two tormented Chinese Catholic souls
By Francesco Sisci

BEIJING - In China, it is now trendy to wear a cross, hanging from a small chain at the neck and fully exposed on the chest. The cross might be made of wood, metal or, even, silver or gold or with precious stones. However, the cross is not always worn for the sake of fashion. While it may be worn as jewelry, it is also worn by many as a religious statement.

Today, when asked about the meaning of the cross, the bearer might answer, proudly and clearly, "Yes I am a Christian." Yet, after that pronouncement, everything becomes blurred. Most people do not know the difference between being Christian (jidujiao in China refers to Protestants) and being Catholic, or of the various branches of the Protestant faith.

A Chinese government estimate puts the total number of Chinese


"Christians" at 130 million, almost 10% of the population, and at least five times the percentage of Christians (Protestants and Catholics) as when the communists took power in China in 1949. Even taking into account the country's population increase during the past 60 years, the absolute numbers of Christians has grown immensely from the original 8 to 9 million in 1949.

However, when taking a closer look at these numbers there might, in fact, be little change from 1949. The Catholics, even in their more optimistic estimates, make up no more than 12 to 13 million, or about 1% of China'ís population. Of note, this is the same percentage of Catholics as in 1949. The rest of the Christians are Protestants or members of similar groups.

I conducted a small survey and found that many Chinese migrants in Italy, who are free to express themselves, have become Jehovah's Witnesses. Many of these people report converting to Christianity in their villages (they are mostly from the Wenzhou area, in Zhejiang province) because a wandering pastor stopped by their house and saved one sick relative through his prayers. In return, the family converted.

In the countryside, there are also many Mormons and Evangelicals. Most simply follow the pastor they have met as a result of yuanfen, or fate [1]. Many of those pastors are self-taught, having only recently read a translation of the Bible in Chinese, and the translation may be not be either accurate or scholarly. To this very weak biblical basis they add their own preaching, which is bound to draw more from local Chinese non-Christian lore than from the Bible, simply because the Bible is not part of Chinese education or tradition. Many pastors actually mix Christianity with Taoism and Buddhism.

Jehovah's Witnesses and Mormons are considered, by Catholics, to be pseudo-Christians and, thus, they might not be very different, theologically, from Hong Xiuquan's Taipings, the religious sect that almost toppled the Qing Dynasty in the middle of the 19th century.

The leader of the rebellion, Hong Xiuquan, claimed to be Jesus Christ's younger brother, according to a vision he had after reading a partial translation of the Bible in Chinese. He was responsible for organizing a religious movement and creating a hierarchical church, where he was the chief leader and his siblings and friends became senior officials. He also edited his own version of the Bible.

At its peak, the tightly knit Taiping organization had millions of converts, and some modern Christians might have sprung from that old, distorted Christian sect while others might be heirs of the highly literate foreign Protestant missionaries who flocked to China beginning in the 19th century. Different from those churches of the past, modern Protestants are not organized into a single vertical Church. As far as it is known, they also do not plan on bringing down the government, they are not rebellious and do not want to establish a new order.

The government, mindful of the past Taiping history, might have been inclined to suppress these new Christians, however, the Falungong, in 1999, changed the order of the government's priorities.

Falungong in the firing line
On April 25, 1999, about 10,000 Falungong (a Taoist-Buddhist sect) followers surrounded Zhongnanhai, China's White House, in a show of force as they demanded greater political power. Top Chinese leaders had no warning from their security agencies, and were caught completely by surprise. They later learned the protest was organized, or abetted, by senior security officials.

Government officials became suspicious that the protest might have been part of some kind of attempted putsch supported by the most conservative, xenophobic wing of the Communist Party and aimed at stopping the ongoing process of reforms. In fact, the Falungong are opposed to modern science and medicine, adhering to an old line of Chinese tradition, and they claim that diseases do not exist, but are manifestations of sins. Thus, without sins there would be no sickness. The Falungong, with a very structured organization modeled after the Communist Party, with cells, a central committee and politburo, claimed to have 100 millions supporters.

"The fact that so many people believed in this mumbo-jumbo changed the debate in the party. It proved that it was not that reforms were going too fast; the problem was that reforms were going too slowly," a senior official told me in 2000 [2].

Additionally, the protest proved there was a "spiritual market" outside of the party's reach. Following Mao Zedong's demise, the party had forsaken all claims to total "spiritual" answers. The party had long stopped preaching "dialectic materialism" as some kind of religion, as it had during the Cultural Revolution (1966-1976). This had created a huge spiritual void and, by the early 1980s, China was rife with all kinds of breathing exercises, called Qigong, and derived from ancient Chinese tradition. These exercises all assured better health and many went as far as promising miracles and immortality. The Falungong was born in these traditions. Now, people who had lost all faith in eternal communism, and with traditional Confucian values shattered by decades of Maoism, turned to Qigong. And following the crackdown on Falungong, many former Qigong practitioners turned their religious interests to Christianity "with Chinese characteristics", and with the blessings of government officials who preferred Christianity to Falungong.

At first glance, those disorganized, scattered Christians were less of a threat to party rule than one organized church (whatever its creed) and they delved less in mystic, millennial beliefs of the Daoist-Buddhist tradition, rife in China since the times of the Yellow turbans (170-184 AD.), the uprising that brought down the Han Dynasty.

Moreover, Christianity did not preach against science and modernity, as the Qigong practices, deeply traditional Chinese and suspicious of modernity and foreign ideas. In fact, the Western tradition proved that Christianity - of all kinds - could work well, hand-in-hand with modernity and science. It was the feasible and proven religious answer to the modern world. So China, just as it had imported science and was importing "modernity", could also hope to import the religion itself, ie Christianity.

In this process, as happened with modernity and "socialism", religion had to adapt it to its "Chinese characters". Then, the work of its pastors would be fully in line with this tradition, just as it was during the work of the Jesuits, who rose to the top echelons of the Chinese imperial bureaucracy in the 16th and 17th centuries.

In sum, many of these new Chinese Christians are part of some form of the new converts to "modernity", which in China is tantamount to "Westernization", that is, the American way of life. In other words, they pray to Jesus as they may eat at McDonald's or at Kentucky Fried Chicken. But, as they cannot eat hamburgers every day and cannot digest cheese and cannot stand its smell, so they cannot take the whole "pure" overeducated Christianity and even the "purely" American Presbyterians or Evangelicals are hard to swallow.

As in their food, they add soy sauce or rice vinegar, so here, in their Evangelical faith, they may add their belief in Feng Shui (wind and water, Chinese traditional geomancy) and the Yijing (ancient soothsayers' manual).

However, as in food, there are real "gourmets" of faith. A whole legion of Chinese, now in many seminaries, devoutly study Latin as they seek to become Catholic or Protestant priests. These people take the old Chinese beliefs with a grain of salt. They do not believe in the metaphysical power of Feng Shui, but lend an ear to it when it concerns some of its more physical and "realistic" aspects, such as recommending not to reside near polluted rivers because of unclean air or the adage to build your house with its back to a high mountain where it will be warmer in winter and protected from cold winds.

Can this tiny Catholic minority in China, which is, anyway, more numerous than Catholics in staunchly Catholic Ireland, be the backbone of a new worldwide Catholicism? Now, more than ever, only God knows. These Chinese Catholics have a very strong faith because they have converted twice; they accepted a religious belief that was strange to them (the Catholic faith) and have also accepted a culture and rituals totally foreign to them. All the rituals of the mass and of the life of the church were distilled through at least 30 centuries of Western tradition, as Catholicism inherited the Jewish, Greek and Roman traditions, and even the language of the church is Latin. These are all foreign things to the Chinese people and culture.

This double conversion is at the heart of the ancient problem of China and Catholics. Non-Catholic Chinese may be indifferent, or even sympathetic, to the "simple" conversion to the Catholic faith, but the total conversion to a foreign culture is a different matter. Furthermore, for the sake of world culture, the idea of "cultural conversion" is not correct. A cultural conversion of all Chinese people would result in a very important cultural loss to the world: the Chinese. Everybody would lose out; first, the Chinese and second, the rest of the world.

Besides, the possibility of converting the culture of all-Chinese is simply impossible and self-defeating. The Chinese culture is too strong, too ancient, too entrenched, and attempts for mass "erasure" with a new culture would backfire. Therefore, either Catholics limit themselves to convert a tiny minority of "religious connoisseurs" or, if they have bolder ambitions, they have to first convert the "Catholic culture" into a Chinese mold. This was first attempted by the Jesuits who worked as true "translators" of culture, as they brought Western ideas to China and Chinese ideas to the West.

In this, it is important to consider religion separately and in two parts. There is the kernel of belief about divinity and there is the cultural wrapping that enables the delivery and the acceptance of the belief. These differences are not absolute, they can be reconciled once the different cultures are fully understood and "translated". But this translation work has, presently, been lagging behind.

This is not a theoretical issue, but is very practical as it trickles down to present day Chinese Catholics, split between the official and underground church, with many people caught in-between. This is also a political issue, though not simply a political issue.

Very briefly, in 1951 the Holy See and the newly founded People's Republic of China broke diplomatic ties. To ensure the party's control over religion, China established "patriotic associations" to oversee all major religions. These associations were designed to keep the local religions independent of foreign influence. The move aroused little controversy, as many Chinese remembered that foreign religions had been used, at times, as instruments by colonial powers.

Isolated from Rome, but with its hierarchy basically intact, the Chinese Catholics held on, as they were mostly deployed in the patriotic associations. Some of them might have found solace in the fact that Jesus had commanded: "To Caesar what is of Caesar's, to God what is of God's." The patriotic Catholics then remained loyal to Rome on religious matters, but bowed to the communist state for all else. Even so, all Catholics suffered, at one point or another, at the hands of the Maoist government and remained unreconciled between their two souls, one Chinese and one Catholic.

In the time of the Cold War, Rome had no inclination to look for compromises, and the hostility was warmly reciprocated in Beijing. In this situation, as the local clergy grew old and many elderly bishops had died, Pope John Paul II granted the Chinese Church, in the 1980s, the privilege of a "special condition". Thus, under conditions of duress and with clear difficulties in communicating with Rome, Chinese Catholics could appoint their own bishops without consultation with the pope.

This privilege allowed the underground church to appoint its own bishops who, then, were not recognized by Beijing. However, the privilege was also called on by the patriotic association that appointed its own bishops who were, at times, not recognized by the pope.

In reality, as the years went by, the situation became confusing due to many gray areas. Most newly appointed bishops were, in 

Continued 1 2  

A new world under one Heaven
(Jul 4, '08)

1. Russia takes control of Turkmen (world?) gas

2. Nothing but pain

3. Mercenaries at work

4. Good cop, bad cop: Pakistan reels

5. Breaking dollar's hegemony

6. Bailout cure worse than disease

7. Why do nations exist?

8. 'Pushover' Maliki stands his ground

9. Volcker's best apprentice

10. Snub for Iran eases nuclear crisis

(24 hours to 11:59pm ET, Jul 29, 2008)


All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
© Copyright 1999 - 2008 Asia Times Online (Holdings), Ltd.
Head Office: Unit B, 16/F, Li Dong Building, No. 9 Li Yuen Street East, Central, Hong Kong
Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110