WRITE for ATol ADVERTISE MEDIA KIT GET ATol BY EMAIL ABOUT ATol CONTACT US
Asia Time Online - Daily News
             
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese




    Greater China
     Aug 24, 2012


Bhutan's fourth estate in bad shape
By Vishal Arora

Journalists in Bhutan are accusing the nation's first democratic government of muzzling press freedom by pulling government advertisements from private newspapers to punish them for negative coverage. The private sector is weak owing to the Himalayan nation's geographical and other constraints, and those ads make up more than 80% of newspapers' revenues.

The ruling Druk Phuensum Tshogpa (DPT), or the Bhutan Peace and Prosperity Party, of Prime Minister Jigmi Y Thinley pledged to nurture democracy before and after it won the first general election in 2008 after about 100 years of absolute monarchy. However, as the end of its five-year term approaches, journalists say the fourth pillar of democracy is crumbling.

"We used to receive around seven pages of government ads until

 

about five months ago, but that has now been reduced to barely two pages," said Kinley Tshering, the editor of the Business Bhutan weekly. He added that the administration was "targeting and victimizing" newspapers that are critical of the government.

"We have seen a dramatic fall in government advertisement from all 10 ministries," said Tenzin Lamsang, chief executive of The Bhutanese, a bi-weekly investigative newspaper.

Media houses complain they have been unable to pay salaries for the past two months and may fold unless the government ads resume or new sources of revenues are found.

Information and Communications Minister Nandalal Rai has blamed the cut in advertisements on a need to minimize government expenditure. "The media should understand that the government [alone] is not in a position to sustain the media," he said.

Journalists say their allegation is based on facts.

On August 17, the partly government-owned Kuensel daily carried a notification by the Election Commission of Bhutan that said, based on directives issued by the Ministry of Finance, "henceforth all advertisements, public notifications and voter educational and information materials related to elections will be published in Kuensel, televised through Bhutan Broadcasting Service Corporation (BBS) and broadcast over Kuzoo FM Radio only.”

While BBS is a government broadcaster, Kuzoo was established by the Royal Secretariat of the King of Bhutan.

It is not clear which departments and ministries were recipients of the finance ministry's directives, apart from the election commission, which chose to disclose it.

Rai believes the election commission should not have issued the notification. The commission, he said, is "simply trying to point fingers at and embarrass" the government.

Even more controversial was a circular sent by the Ministry of Information and Communications (MoIC) on April 2. Published by the Business Bhutan, the circular directed all MoIC departments “not to provide any advertisement, announcement, notification, circular, etc to The Bhutanese". [1]

Rai has said the circular was the result of an internal misunderstanding, and had been withdrawn. "I meant to say all Bhutanese media, but it was mistaken as The Bhutanese newspapers," he said. However, the newspaper isn't convinced.

"The circular was issued by the ministry in response to critical and investigative stories done by The Bhutanese on the government, all of which have been factually correct and in line with the ethics of good journalism," Lamsang said. "It seems that any newspaper or journalist attempting investigative work will have to pay a heavy price and enter the government's blacklist. Forget investigative journalism, journalists and newspapers in the future will think twice before even doing remotely critical stories of the DPT government."

Lamsang asks why the circular was stamped "Confidential" in red if there was no national security or important state secret involved? And if the intention was to stop ads in all media in Bhutan, why did it not happen? "The intention clearly was to close down The Bhutanese," he said.

"If you look at the news coverage in Bhutan, all critical stories have been done by the private media. So the very institution of free opinion is being dismantled," said Passang Dorji, president of the Journalist Association of Bhutan. "It's a regressive step," Dorji said. "I hope this is a temporary, not long-term, measure."

Rai said the government's advertising policy was based on a 2007 finance ministry circular, which stated that advertisement should be distributed in an equitable manner but keeping in mind the reach of the media.

However, there's no level playing field. The private media sector came into existence only in 2006 during the country's transition to democracy. Kuensel and BBS, on the other hand, have been around for much longer, and have a better reach due to the government's infrastructure support.

Bhutan, a nation of around 700,000 people, has only about a dozen-and-a-half private newspapers and magazines. All publications in English are required to produce a version in the national Dzongkha language, which adds to the media's financial woes. Cross-media ownership, which could help in pooling of resources, is prohibited.

The government is formulating advertisement guidelines that will reflect the country's unique policy of gross national happiness (GNH) - which is used to gauge national progress. Journalists fear that GNH as a criterion, requiring the media to promote the vague concept of happiness, will pave the way for the government to use discretion and exclude certain newspapers.

If the ruling party truly wants to sustain and deepen the democracy, it will withdraw its exclusive advertising approach, Dorji said. Some other journalists are not hopeful. The nascent democracy "is dying a slow and suffocating death," The Bhutanese warned in an editorial last week on media freedoms.

Note:
1. See here

Vishal Arora is a New Delhi-based journalist. He researches and writes on politics, culture, religion, foreign affairs and human rights, primarily but not exclusively in South and Southeast Asia. His articles have appeared in the Guardian, the Washington Post, the Huffington Post, USA Today, World Politics Review, Foreign Policy in Focus, the Religion News Service, and many other outlets. He can be contacted at vishalarora_in@hotmail.com and some of his articles can be read here. Follow him on Twitter: vishalarora_in

(Copyright 2011 Asia Times Online (Holdings) Ltd. All rights reserved. Please contact us about sales, syndication and republishing.)





Bhutan as a model
(Jul 14, '12)

Bhutan's happiness index goes global
(Apr 12, '12)


1.
The South gathers in Tehran

2. Will Iran be US's Melos?

3. Meles Zenawi and the death of the African Renaissance

4. China bides its time with political model

5. Why Gu Kailai stood by her man

6. War fever as seen from Iran

7. Pussy Riot divides Russian society

8. Indian Army in the line of unfriendly fire

9. Old wealth reborn in new Indonesia

10. Egypt thumbs nose at US

(24 hours to 11:59pm ET, Aug 22, 2012)

 
 



All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
© Copyright 1999 - 2012 Asia Times Online (Holdings), Ltd.
Head Office: Unit B, 16/F, Li Dong Building, No. 9 Li Yuen Street East, Central, Hong Kong
Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110