WRITE for ATol ADVERTISE MEDIA KIT GET ATol BY EMAIL ABOUT ATol CONTACT US
Asia Time Online - Daily News
             
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese



    China Business
     Apr 8, 2006
Shanghai: Land of the rising trapezoid
By Jeremy Hurewitz

SHANGHAI - The wave of building construction that has swept China at an ever-increasing pace since the 1980s has become possibly the biggest building spree in history, and the radical transformation thus wrought is nowhere more obvious than in the country's most grand metropolis, Shanghai. Almost 7,000 buildings of more than 11 stories have been built in the city since



1990 (New York, by contrast, has managed a mere 5,500 in
total). So skyscrapers are not exactly a novelty in Shanghai.

But the Shanghai World Financial Center (WFC), now under construction in the financial district of Pudong, is big even by Chinese standards. The WFC is set to become one of the world's tallest buildings, at 492 meters surpassing even its heralded neighbor, the 88-story, 421-meter Jin Mao Tower, home to "the highest hotel in the world", the Grand Hyatt.

Intense construction activity on the WFC is now underway, but if and when it reaches its planned height, it would become the world's tallest inhabited building - only for a brief period, however, since the Burj Dubai, now being built in the eponymous Persian Gulf city-state, would greatly exceed it at a possible 705 meters (though the Burj's ultimate height has been kept secret).

The story of the WFC began in 1997, when Japanese developer Minoru Mori, of Moru Building Co Ltd, began planning a supertower in Shanghai, and hired New York architecture firm Kohn Pedersen Fox for the design. Chief architect William Pedersen said in a television interview that he was inspired by "the ancient Chinese period when the symbols of the square prism and the circular disk seemed to take on a great importance for the relationship of the earth to the sky".

The form of the building thus became a rectangular prism, but with sliced, tapering sides, so the shape became more delicate at the top. Since, at such heights, wind loads (the horizontal forces put on a building by wind currents) become a serious concern, Pedersen designed the building with a cylindrical opening - what he called a "circular moon gate" - to relieve those pressures and stabilize the behemoth (see illustration, figure 1).

Wind tunnel tests showed the moon gate would achieve its practical purpose, but the feature created an unanticipated and embarrassing problem. In Pedersen's words: "What I had, in my own mind, thought of as representing a moon gate, in fact, had been reversed in their own mind to represent the rising sun [of Japan]."

Architect Leslie Robertson (famed for his work on the World Trade Center in New York), whose firm Leslie Robertson Associates was hired by Mori in early 2001 to work on the project, added: "As originally presented to Shanghai, the moon gate, this great hole was not very well appreciated because it was seen as an emblem of Japan. And the mayor of Shanghai was not the tiniest bit interested [in that]."

To solve the problem, Pedersen suggested a bridge through the aperture to "diminish the power of the circular gesture" and "symbolize the bringing of the two sides together". This idea was initially accepted, and led to a new configuration (see figure 2).

Further events intervened, however, before work could begin in earnest. Just as the building's foundation had been laid, the Asian economic crisis forced a halt to construction work for several years, and Mori waited for market conditions to improve.

Meanwhile, the September 11, 2001 attacks in the US caused architects and contractors worldwide to reassess supertall projects, particularly with regard to safety and structural stability in the event of major fires. When work finally resumed in 2003, criticism of the design continued, and ultimately, in October 2005, a new design was unveiled, with the circle completely eliminated, replaced with a trapezoid shape (see figure 3). As of this writing, the first 20-odd stories of the WFC's structural framework are complete, and its height is increasing almost daily.

Money and minefields
In many ways, the "moon gate" affair symbolizes the experiences of foreign architecture firms in today's China, where a minefield of political and nationalist sensitivities mixes with a fecund environment for developers, all spiced with the peculiarities of the Chinese way of doing business.

Both an immense business opportunity, and a sense of mission, seem to draw foreign architects to China. The Middle Kingdom and its booming economy offer a chance for many architects to work on projects whose size and scale are perhaps once-in-a-lifetime opportunities. Many architects also speak of the chance to make their mark on a society that is changing before the world's eyes. But a peculiar form of both self-censorship and cultural preservation colors their work in the country.

"The aesthetic value of ancient China has been lost," lamented Jeff Bonner, a partner in Urban Fabric Architecture. Originally from New Zealand, Bonner contrasts his work in China with other cities he's worked in, in particular London, where an architect has to keep in mind the history of the city, and often even the particularities of the neighborhood, when designing.

In China, planners want the buildings up as soon as possible and generally the design called for is either radically modern or derived from classical European elements. With traditional Chinese buildings being torn down to make way for these foreign structures, there is inevitably a net loss of traditional Chinese architecture. This is particularly true in Beijing, where hutongs (traditional alleys) continue to be erased to make way for the government's ambitious plans for the 2008 Olympics.

Bonner contrasted the situation in Beijing with the work he's doing on an 18-story hotel to be built right below Huangshan (Yellow Mountain), one of China's major cultural landmarks, and a United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) world heritage site.

But Bonner's firm was not given any instructions about how the hotel should reflect cultural and local sensitivities (though some would argue that putting up an 18-story hotel below a natural wonder renders the idea of sensitivity null and void). So Bonner and his colleagues elected to go with a gray and white color scheme, which reflected both their desire to build something that blends as well as possible with the landscape (gray and white are the traditional colors of buildings in the surrounding Anhui province) and which they hope will also anticipate the double critique that they are expecting from both Chinese and UNESCO officials. Such anticipation, and a lack of input in the early stages, is typical of the guesswork that foreign architects have to undertake when designing in China.

Working in such a way is frustrating, since most architects are not used to having their work changed at late stages. A client will typically approve a certain design only to later grow worried about the reaction from government officials. "The client realizes that the government thinks in a certain way and then they want to mold the project around that," said Victor Njo, an ethnic Chinese architect born in Indonesia but raised in the Netherlands, who works for an Australian architecture firm called PTW.

When asked whether he has had to consider feng shui (wind and water, Chinese geomancy) very much, he said "Not really. Most of the basic feng shui ideas - like [the idea that] the back of [a] building should be facing the mountain and the front facing the sea - are just design common sense." Njo expressed the same frustration as many other architects with clients "sticking their nose in at later stages". To Njo, issues related to such things as feng shui become primarily an excuse to meddle or make changes.

Friends first, buildings later
All of the architects spoken to for this story expressed strong reactions to the need for bonding with clients to develop guanxi - the crucial system of relationships that underlies all business in China. Some find the endless dinners, rounds of karaoke and shots of baijiu (a vodka-like distilled spirit) exasperating and irrelevant to their work. Others are drawn to the almost ritualistic courtship that goes on between client and architect as the client evaluates whether a particular architect or firm is suitable to put up their building.

"We are trained to come straight to the point," said Johannes Reinsch of the German firm Engel und Zimmerman, which is involved with the National Library building being constructed in Beijing. "But when there [were] difficult questions and I [handed] over my priority list right away there was no reply at all. I had to learn that first, we become friends, and then we do business."

Reinsch, like many architects, said that while there were chances to do big things in China, it was often difficult to navigate the process of finding work, as that process was not only culturally very different from the West, but also suffered from a lack of transparency.

"There are [many] more opportunities in China, it is much more challenging in terms of the type and size of projects, the scale of the projects. But on the other hand the risk is also higher. For instance, you go to competitions to get a project and you have to put your best staff on, present models and presentations, which is all a big investment. But the system is not clear for us and it is not easy to evaluate your chances and whether you should even try to get in on a project."

In the West, after a bidding process, a jury will award a winner, then there will be a detailed report about why the winner was chosen and usually, critiques of the individual bids submitted. "In China you only hear [back] if you won, sometimes if you entered a finalist stage. Usually it is like a black hole. You get no information about the process, [consequently] you can't get better," said Reinsch. Many architects fret that the competitions are dog-and-pony shows with winners often chosen in advance rendering the process a colossal waste of time and money.

The government threw another wrench into architects' work on June 1 last year when it slapped a 5.5% tax on the sale of properties sold within two years of purchase, in an effort to cool a sizzling real estate market, in which speculation threatened to create a dangerous bubble.

Suddenly, developers pulled back projects that they had just commissioned, and work dried up. In the West, architects would normally have ample warning about new legislation that would affect their market, not to mention the chance to make their voice heard about that legislation. In China, the tax was introduced as an edict from Beijing.

Many foreign architects working in China feel that the well-known Chinese tendency to rush projects and use subpar materials comes from a sense of transience that is hard for Westerners to understand.

One must remember that Chinese buildings have a shorter life cycle; a building that might be put through a renovation in the West when it ages is often torn down in China. But perhaps deeper than this is a sense that China has experienced such turmoil in its past that nothing is permanent, even buildings thousands of meters tall.

Jeremy Hurewitz is a Shanghai-based freelance journalist. He edits a monthly series on Asia for Project Syndicate.

(Copyright 2006 Asia Times Online Ltd. All rights reserved. Please contact us about sales, syndication and republishing .)


How Shanghai is that? (Mar 30, '06)
 
Shanghai, the becoming thing: Believe the hype? (Jan 7, '06)

 
 



All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
© Copyright 1999 - 2006 Asia Times Online Ltd.
Head Office: Rm 202, Hau Fook Mansion, No. 8 Hau Fook St., Kowloon, Hong Kong
Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110