WRITE for ATol ADVERTISE MEDIA KIT GET ATol BY EMAIL ABOUT ATol CONTACT US
Asia Time Online - Daily News
             
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese



    China Business
     Mar 31, 2007
Page 3 of 3
China draws Africa into its orbit
By Bright B Simons, Evans Lartey and Franklin Cudjoe

the country.

Indeed, it is believed that the first satellite-relayed live telephone call was between Nigeria's then-prime minister Taffawa Balewa and US president John F Kennedy.

In 2003, when Nigeria commissioned its first satellite, it was manufactured in the UK and launched from a Russian base in



Plestek.

The shift therefore to China, so comprehensively, is noteworthy. The problem is that like so many of the switches of "allegiances" in Africa, it is predicated less on an understanding of Africa's own structural needs and more on a sounder if narrow-focused appreciation of external geopolitical trends.

Nigerian strategists were perhaps shrewd in deciding to award the $450 million contract to Great Wall just when China is in a mood to impress developing countries. But it is unclear whether this particular project will do much in ensuring a sustained technology transfer to Nigeria.

Contrast this with South Africa's approach. When in 2003 China successfully launched its manned space mission, Andrew Aphana, an official at the South African Department of Arts, Culture, Science and Technology, told Xinhua that his country saw commercial space cooperation with China on the horizon.

In fact cooperation already existed. For instance, China was maintaining a tracking ship alongside Cape Town's Table Bay harbor, and another telemetry, tracking and control station - one of the few outside China - is based in neighboring Namibia. But the broached cooperation is unlikely to follow the same pattern as the Nigerian case.

In February 1999, the US National Aeronautics and Space Administration successfully launched South Africa's satellite, SunSat. SunSat had been wholly designed, developed and built by South Africa. A commercial firm spun off the country's University of Stellenbosch had been responsible for managing the entire project. Toward the end of January this year, South Africa successfully completed the development of another satellite. By May, the satellite - SumbandilaSat - will be launched from a Russian submarine into orbit, whereupon its remote-sensing equipment is expected to begin delivering on the $68 million investment by providing useful geo-imaging information for use in agricultural, forestry and surveying research.

Thus, should South Africa begin serious space collaboration with China, it will have the capacity not only to insist on copious technology transfers but, even more crucial, the capacity to utilize these transfers toward the local development of competencies. Its current collaboration with Russia is based on just such a framework. In a recent visit to South Africa, President Vladimir Putin pledged to expand the sphere of existing cooperation to embrace microgravity, navigation and space medicine, signaling that China will really have to up its game on the technology transfer front if it is to get in on the action.

Whereas South Africa's government had invested much of its small budget in bolstering the capacity of the country's human infrastructure through public-private partnerships with institutions such as SunSpace and Stellenbosch, Nigeria has decided to send missions to the moon by 2030 - this at a time when such countries as India are pulling back to focus on the use of satellite systems in novel, socially transforming segments such as telemedicine.

At this juncture, some readers may wish to question whether space research is even an appropriate arena at all for a developing country to be expending its resources on. Couldn't Nigeria have used the nearly $100 million it spent on establishing a space agency in 1998 on malaria eradication, for instance? This is a misconception. The same argument could have been made with regards to India's software industry when it started.

In fact, space technology these days is not predominantly about space telescopes and Mars orbiting missions. Nigeria's satellites, for instance, when operational, will provide Internet access to parts of the country where telephone and fiber-optic networks are non-existent. It will provide an observation platform for monitoring the country's besieged pipelines; help in disaster relief by providing up-to-date data; and help better manage epidemics such as Guinea-worm infestation. It will also be crucial to geological forecasting to optimize food security and hydrological resources.

Also, it is entirely possible that Africa's future may depend on how successfully it "leaps" a developmental phase such as industrialization or a green revolution and moves directly into technology-driven services. Indeed, these days only the boldest, or most reckless, economists hold out any future for Africa in traditional industrialization along the lines of steel mills and aluminum foundries. Space research, provided the priorities are respected, can be extremely beneficial to the development of human resources, especially as the technologies studied, developed and deployed in its course often find useful applications in less flamboyant-sounding areas such as agricultural engineering and consumer electronics.

There is therefore every justification for developing countries, ranging from budding superpowers such as China to struggling states such as Nigeria, to pursue such technologies to whatever extent their resources permit and, while doing so, to collaborate with one another toward mutual goals. But for these to yield maximum returns, it is important that partners in such prospective joint schemes are each positioned in a manner that allows synergistic cooperation to flourish.

At present, countries such as Nigeria make Africa seem like the weakest link in the chain.

Bright B Simons is an adjunct fellow at the Center for Humane Education (Imani), an Accra-based think-tank dedicated to researching economic trends to glean practical public-policy insights for the benefit of government, business and civil society in Ghana. Evans Lartey is director of development at Imani. Franklin Cudjoe is the executive director of Imani.

(Copyright 2007 Asia Times Online Ltd. All rights reserved. Please contact us about sales, syndication and republishing.)

 1 2 3 Back

 

 
 



All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
© Copyright 1999 - 2007 Asia Times Online (Holdings), Ltd.
Head Office: Unit B, 16/F, Li Dong Building, No. 9 Li Yuen Street East, Central, Hong Kong
Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110