WRITE for ATol ADVERTISE MEDIA KIT GET ATol BY EMAIL ABOUT ATol CONTACT US
Asia Time Online - Daily News
             
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese



    China Business
     May 26, 2007
China wants dialogue, US just wants more
By Zhou Jiangong

SHANGHAI - An impatient American "Hurricane Hank" finally got something "tangible" from China's "Iron Lady" during the just-ended second meeting of the Sino-US Strategic Economic Dialogue (SED) in Washington.

However, Chinese officials are unhappy at mounting political pressure on the economic dialogue from the US side. Analysts say the bitter experience of the Chinese delegation in Washington, DC, may lead Chinese leaders to think twice about



the relevance of the SED, which was founded last September by Presidents George W Bush and Hu Jintao.

US Treasury Secretary Henry "Hank" Paulson has designed a seemingly long-term "high-quality" discussion mechanism on complex issues facing the two countries' economic relations.

But in the opinion of some Chinese officials and analysts it now looks more like something to coax China into an endless circle of yielding to one short-term demand after another from Capitol Hill, Wall Street, US government departments, and a variety of pressure groups.

"Each time, China makes some concessions and then the US side mulls more political pressures for next time in hope of getting more," said an analyst in Shanghai. "So what's the purpose of the so-called 'strategic dialogue'? And what will China expect from the third round of the Strategic Economic Dialogue in Beijing six months later?"

At the opening of the SED on Tuesday, Vice Premier Wu Yi, China's chief representative in the talks, warned that attempts to politicize economic and trade issues should be resisted.

"Politicizing economic and trade issues is absolutely unacceptable, since it is of no help but will make the situation more complicated, harm bilateral economic and trade relations, or even cause serious negative impact on the progress of overall China-US ties," said Wu, known as China's "Iron Lady".

"We should not easily blame the other side for one's own domestic problems, or even force one's own views by imposing pressure on and confronting the other," she said. "Against the ever deepened economic globalization today, confrontation does no good at all to problem-solving, and pressure imposition can only make the situation more complex."

In China's view, "politicization" mainly refers to growing pressure for revaluation of the yuan from the US Congress and the Bush administration.

China has repeatedly explained to the US side that quick appreciation of its currency would be disastrous for the Chinese economy, which in turn would have a negative impact on the global economy. Many US economists agree that yuan appreciation would not help much in narrowing the trade gap between the two countries, though most argue that the currency is grossly undervalued, making Chinese imports cheap and therefore unfairly competitive.

"US politicians certainly have a full understanding of China's position," said a researcher in world economy with the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences. "It appears that they continue to heighten the pressure on the issue with a concern with their domestic politics, not so much with the Sino-US trade. And by exercising such pressure, they also want to gain something else from China. This is what we call 'politicization'.

"A dialogue should be in two ways," he said. "However, the Sino-US Strategic Economic Dialogue turns out like a one-way channel, with the one side turning a deaf ear to the other.

"The Chinese government has repeatedly said that China wants to buy more goods from the US as an effort to narrow the trade gap, but Washington refuses to ease restrictions on exports of high-tech products to China."

Indeed, despite the fact that China agreed to grant more market access to US businesses, under the "wary eyes" of US politicians, the second round of sweeping economic discussions hosted in Washington by Paulson has not made any major breakthrough that could defuse pending punitive bills drafted on Capitol Hill.

US lawmakers complain that yuan appreciation and the protection of intellectual property were not addressed. They have pledged to proceed with a pack of bills that, once passed, would impose sanctions on China's goods exported to the US and could cause trade wars between the two economic powers.

Even President Bush stood up and appealed to China to take action on currency appreciation: "One of the issues that I emphasized to Madame Wu Yi, as well as the delegation, was that we're watching very carefully as to whether or not they will appreciate their currency. And that's all in the context of making it clear to China that we value our relationship, but the [US]$233 billion trade deficit must be addressed."

This was the first time Bush had publicly addressed the currency issue.

Ahead of the Sino-US dialogue, the People's Bank of China (PBoC), China's central bank, last week expanded the floating band against the greenback to 0.5% from the previous 0.3%. The action is largely symbolic and it sent a signal to the US Congress that China will float its currency but it is up to Beijing, not Congress, to decide on the timetable.

PBoC governor Zhou Xiaochuan said after the talks in Washington that China plans to increase flexibility in the yuan's exchange rate, but "we will continue to follow the three principles of exchange-rate reform and increase the flexibility of the yuan''.

While China stands firm on the yuan issue, it has made concessions in other areas.

A delegation of 170 Beijing mandarins, including 15 ministerial-level and 10 vice-ministerial-level government officials led by Wu Yi, may have failed to please Congress, but the Chinese chose to make a concession to Paulson, the former chief executive officer of Goldman Sachs, by increasing the quota for foreign investment in Chinese stocks from $10 billion to $30 billion. Thus more foreign investors, mainly from the US, will be able to tap into China's buoyant capital market under the QFII (qualified foreign institutional investor) program.

China will also lift restrictions on foreign firms entering its securities industry, which is extremely profitable because of the explosive trading volume. In addition, China will announce before the third round of the SED in Beijing six months from now that it will allow foreign securities firms to expand their operations in China to include brokerage, proprietary trading and fund management.

Paulson can also boast a deal package from the talks that includes:
  • Doubling of daily passenger flights from the US to China by 2012, starting with the addition of a new daily flight this year.
  • A declaration of intent to launch negotiations to facilitate Chinese group leisure travel to the United States.
  • China will immediately allow foreign-invested banks to offer their own brand of yuan-denominated credit and debit cards. This will allow US banks to offer a full range of yuan services to compete with Chinese banks that currently offer these services.
  • Over the next five years, the US and China will develop up to 15 large-scale projects for capturing and using methane from coal mines in China.

    While comforting Wall Street, China also tried to appease Capitol Hill. A delegation of Chinese companies has signed more than $20 billion of trade deals this month. Six Chinese manufacturing groups representing 208 companies visited 25 US cities.

    While Paulson called the agreements "significant", the issue of the yuan exchange rate against the US dollar, the top concern of Congress, was not even mentioned.

    "Mr Paulson does not seem to believe that the exchange rate is the central issue, although he may still be pushed to do so by Congress. He focuses on the critical importance for China and US-China relations of capital market development in China," a source close to Paulson's private adviser told China Business News, a leading business newspaper based in Shanghai.

    To Paulson, the undervalued yuan, blamed by Congress for causing the huge trade deficit and stealing jobs from Americans, needs to be dealt with in an incremental way. He would like to persuade - rather than pressure - China to revalue or significantly float its currency. He thinks a more flexible yuan is in China's best interests and it is up to Beijing to take action.

    Zhou Jiangong is a Shanghai-based analyst on China's economic, political and foreign affairs.

    (Copyright 2007 Asia Times Online Ltd. All rights reserved. Please contact us about sales, syndication and republishing.)

  • A dialogue of the mute (May 23, '07)

     
     



    All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
    © Copyright 1999 - 2007 Asia Times Online (Holdings), Ltd.
    Head Office: Unit B, 16/F, Li Dong Building, No. 9 Li Yuen Street East, Central, Hong Kong
    Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110