WRITE for ATol ADVERTISE MEDIA KIT GET ATol BY EMAIL ABOUT ATol CONTACT US
Asia Time Online - Daily News
             
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese



    China Business
     Feb 6, 2008
Protection(ism) against the big freeze
By Wu Zhong, China Editor

HONG KONG - The snowstorms devastating China over the past few weeks have done more than disrupt the homeward exodus of millions of migrant workers keen to celebrate the country's lunar new year, or Spring Festival, holiday.

The blizzards threaten the country's market reforms as city authorities act to safeguard food supplies and respond to central government orders to curb price rises.

Food - most notably pork - and drink lie close to the heart of the Spring Festival, a time for grand family reunions, and those who are away from home make great efforts to travel back, ready to splurge their meagre savings on wining and dining their relations. A shortage of food supplies or price increases in the key festive



ingredients could spark public discontent, threatening social stability, and thus are "political incorrect".

This partially explains why, in mid-January, the central government began even before the snow storms hit the country, to impose price controls on daily necessities such as meat, cooking oil and other foodstuffs. From a broader perspective the government intervention in the market was aimed at curbing inflation in general. Following Beijing's order, regional governments are now trying to bring prices under control.

Administrative measures, which may prevent price hikes of foodstuff in the short term, cannot ease shortages of supply and may even worsen them. For instance, lower grain or pork prices may dissuade farmers from growing more grain or raising more pigs, unless subsidized by the government.

Nor will price controls ease the shortages facing regions not self-sufficient in food. Hence Beijing's market intervention may encourage local protectionism, as each region tries its best to ensure its supply to curb price increases. Food- and meat-producing provinces will be reluctant to export their products, putting less well-supplied regions in a more desperate predicament. Guangdong province, which has population of about 110 million, is a prime example in this regard.

Guangdong, said to be China's richest province and the one with the most free-wheeling economy, cannot supply itself with sufficient food and meat. Formerly an important agricultural province, Guangdong in the country's south has over the past 30 years turned itself into a manufacturing and export hub. Its gross domestic product (GDP) has risen to 3.06 trillion yuan (US$425 billion) in 2007, or one eighth of the country's total and more than Taiwan's estimated GDP of $370 billion.

To develop its industry, Guangdong has sacrificed its agriculture, with farmland turned over to factories and farmers becoming factory workers, office staff or business people. As a net importer of foodstuff and meat, the province is particularly vulnerable to supply shortages. Normally, it easily exports industrial products to other provinces and imports foodstuffs through internal trade. But when other provinces want to ensure ample supply in local markets, Guangdong faces trouble. Now is one such time.

The heavy recent snowfalls in south and east China have virtually cut Guangdong's land transport links to the rest of the country, interrupting food shipments into the province. Its cities now have to try every means to secure supply, by hook or by crook - even at the cost of other cities in the same province.

In Guangzhou, provincial capital of Guangdong, municipal government authorities held an emergency meeting on January 28 to work out measures to deal with the aftermath of the snowstorms. Zhao Xiaosui, director of the Guangzhou municipal trade and economic commission, which oversees the supply of daily necessities and price controls, set "irrevocable targets" covering live and frozen pigs to ensure the supply of pork, particularly during the lunar new year.

To ensure the targets are met, Zhao ordered that locally raised pigs must be sold in the local market and "no single porker of live pig is allowed to be shipped outside Guangzhou"; he also ordered that all shipments of live pigs from other places coming into Guangzhou, even in passage, be kept and sold in Guangzhou.

These two orders indicate naked regional protectionism by banning "free trade" of pigs between Guangzhou and other places and go against the spirit of a market economy, which may cause problems down the road.

Pig farmers in Guangzhou now cannot make potentially bigger profits by selling their products elsewhere; yet farmers have raised pigs with their own input and efforts, and they are entitled to seek maximum profits. If the price in Guangzhou is higher than in other places, say neighboring Dongguan or Shenzhen, farmers naturally want to sell their pigs in Guangzhou. But if prices elsewhere are higher, Zhao's ban deprives the farmers of their right to make more money. Unless the Guangzhou government is willing to compensate them, they could sue it for causing them losses.

The second order sounds even more like highway robbery. Some Guangzhou companies may "import" pigs for the purpose of re-exporting them. Some others may just be involved in shipping animals, carrying live pigs through Guangzhou. Unless their businesses are illegal, it is hard to imagine how Zhao's order can be executed. Again, the Guangzhou government may face lawsuits unless it has set aside funds to compensate those affected.

Guangzhou may have set a precedent to be followed by other cities in Guangdong and further afield. A spread of protectionism to other sectors could further jeopardize the country's internal trade, and hence its economy, undermining China's market-oriented reforms of the past three decades.

From another perspective, Zhao's orders simply show how desperate the Guangzhou municipal government is to prevent higher pork prices. It also demonstrates the difficulties confronting regions that have insufficient supplies of foodstuffs to remain "politically correct" by strictly following Beijing's price-control order.

The central government's market intervention must therefore be temporary and should be revoked as soon as possible, allowing market forces to perform their role once more.

(Copyright 2008 Asia Times Online Ltd. All rights reserved. Please contact us about sales, syndication and republishing.)


Inflation gloom in China snow chaos (Jan 30, '08)


1. Iran tries to make up lost ground

2. Yes, Romney, there
is a Sanity Clause


3. A trillion-dollar smile

4. A failure of central banking

5. China's commercial aviation
in take-off mode


6. How oil burst America's bubble

7. Apocalypse then

8. Reflation contemplation

9. Towards a new 'Suez crisis'

10. A flea in the ear for Mullah Omar

11. Ahmadinejad battles on the home front

(24 hours to 11:59 pm ET, Feb 4, 2008)

 
 



All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
© Copyright 1999 - 2008 Asia Times Online (Holdings), Ltd.
Head Office: Unit B, 16/F, Li Dong Building, No. 9 Li Yuen Street East, Central, Hong Kong
Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110