WRITE for ATol ADVERTISE MEDIA KIT GET ATol BY EMAIL ABOUT ATol CONTACT US
Asia Time Online - Daily News
             
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese



    China Business
     Apr 9, 2011


Page 2 of 2
Broad's Zhang builds for a cleaner world
By John Haffner

He details the many aspects of the environmental crisis confronting us: not only greenhouse gases, but also forms of ocean pollution and health-related pollution that "break the natural balance". When this balance is broken, says Zhang, "there could be diseases and disorders of human reproductive functions."


Credit: A Broad employee presents company equipment. Courtesy of Broad.

Zhang takes a machine from his desk, explaining that it measures formaldehyde. He pulls a pear from a drawer and digs beneath the skin with his nail, holding the machine to the exposed inside. The

 
measurement jumps immediately to 0.66 parts per million (ppm) and keeps climbing to 2.33 ppm. He explains that some fruit producers in China use formaldehyde (as part of the packaging and shipping process) so that fruit will keep longer without spoiling, and he claims that the average Chinese may be exposed to many times what is thought to be the safe level of formaldehyde.

Next he produces a machine that measures particulates in the air. Inside his office, with an air filter and closed windows, the machine registers low levels (but not zero) for particulates of all sizes. He then opens the window and asks me to hold the machine outside. Immediately the numbers begin climbing rapidly. Larger sizes of pollutants (0.5, 1.0 μm) increase by an average of 500-fold. More disturbingly, the smallest size pollutant measured, 0.3 μm, jumps from a reading of just above 5,000 indoors to more than 428,000 outdoors - a more than 800-fold increase. The smaller the particle, the more dangerous it is to human health.

Zhang explains that Germany's outdoor particulates at the 0.3 μm level would be only two to six times the reading in his filtered office - not 800 times. The vast majority of this air pollution, he says, comes from power plants, steel production, and cars. And Changsha is not the worst of it, I ask? "Changsha's pollution," he says, "is around the middle level of cities in China - better than Shanghai, Beijing, Guangzhou, or Chengdu."

Sustainability requires sacrifice
For Zhang, we cannot continue like this. We face a binary choice: "There are only two ways to regain balance for the planet: humanity's self-discipline in its activities or mass scale death of the population."

Moving beyond the typically sanitized rhetoric of companies known for green technologies, Zhang continues: "In my opinion, if the consumption pattern does not change, humanity will be destroyed sooner or later, maybe in 100 or 200 years. Disasters will kill most of the people, and the planet will gain balance again."
I ask Zhang what can be done - and in particular, what governments can do. He answers that "there should be policies and standards to tell people how much they should consume." Technologies alone cannot save us, he argues. Even a proliferation of companies like Broad will not be enough to save the planet. We need to become "a low-carbon society", he says, but even if green technologies become much more advanced, the current direction is something the world "cannot sustain".

What we need, says Zhang, is "a revolution in peoples' attitudes towards life". This revolution must include a global imperative to minimize carbon emissions per person: "If we are moving towards a planet of 10 billion people, we should reduce emissions to 0.5 tons per person, to meet the hypothesis of limiting temperature increase to another two degrees - and even then we will already be suffering."

And then Zhang uses a word that politicians take pains to avoid, no matter whether they are Chinese or Western: "There should be sacrifice. If there is no sacrifice among people in developed countries, especially wealthy people in developed countries, the world has no hope."


Credit: The Broad motto: "We preserve life." Courtesy of Broad.

Zhang singles out the West not only because its emissions are much higher per capita, but also because people from developing countries "want to live like people from developed countries". But he is no less concerned about attitudes and trends in China. The fundamental problem everywhere, he says, including China, is the blind pursuit of economic development. "All the standards the governments are looking for are about GDP, or public income," but these measures, he says, only capture part of the story of human needs and wants.

I ask Zhang whether he is optimistic or pessimistic that such a revolution is possible, and his response is instructive: "I don't have an attitude towards this. I just try my best to promote my understanding." He predicts that more and more people will come to share this view, "but for now we don't have many". He acknowledges that he is both awed by and fearful of the pace of change in his country: "I see from changes in China that humanity has infinite power to create. But infinite creative ability," he says, "can also lead to infinite destructive power."

We talk about the sweep of Chinese history, of how Chinese attitudes toward nature have changed. I point out that whereas Mao regarded nature as a hostile force to be controlled, earlier conceptions placed human beings within the natural order. I ask whether China could rediscover this older view, and whether it would help.

Zhang seems to brighten at this: "If foreigners can understand this aspect of Chinese culture, then we have a chance. This is a very central problem."

He mentions the Tang Dynasty (618CE to 907CE), and goes back even further: "This concept of people living in harmony with nature comes from 2,000 years ago. The other Chinese traditional concept is to be satisfied with what you have."

Zhang sums up his philosophy: "The most important change that people can make in their lives is to understand the internal meaning of these ideas. Technologies can be refined to save the environment, but without these ideas of life, we will not solve these problems."

Thanks to Bob Zhou for his assistance with translation and transcription.

Based in China, John Haffner is a business executive, consultant, and writer engaged in a variety of clean energy projects in Asia and Canada. As vice president for Bridge Renewable Energy Technologies, he is developing biomass gasification projects in the Philippines and Indonesia. As a consultant, he has recently advised on projects related to the smart grid, low-carbon transportation fuels, and climate change adaptation. As a writer, he is author of a series on Chinese clean energy leaders for Policy Innovations, and was lead author of Japan's Open Future: An Agenda for Global Citizenship (Anthem Press, 2009). Haffner was a 2008 World Fellow at Yale University, and in 2009–2010 was co-leader of a Yale University-funded project examining renewable energy innovation in Asia.

Published with permission of the Global Policy Innovations program at the Carnegie Council for Ethics in International Affairs.

(Copyright 2011 Global Policy Innovations.)

1 2 Back

 

 

 
 



All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
© Copyright 1999 - 2011 Asia Times Online (Holdings), Ltd.
Head Office: Unit B, 16/F, Li Dong Building, No. 9 Li Yuen Street East, Central, Hong Kong
Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110