INTERVIEW Swimming against the
mainstream By Christopher Horton
Perhaps it shouldn't be surprising that the
man widely considered as the top investigative journalist
in the United States is persona non grata in his
own country's media. For Greg Palast, an accidental
journalist, this is not upsetting. "Our news is like
Pravda," he stated matter-of-factly from his New York
office in a recent interview with Asia Times Online.
Palast is content to continue his investigative
reports into what he perceives as an American oligarchy
- a nexus between politicians and corporations in which
the line between the two is increasingly blurred - an
endeavor which he pursues across the Atlantic in the
British media. However, he is gradually being
"discovered" by Americans tired of channel surfing only
to find the same version of events coming out of the
mouths of different talking heads.
"Fair and
balanced" Palast is not. He has an agenda: to answer his
paramount question, "Who are the real bad guys?" A
bloodhound with an MBA and an allergy to what he calls
the "straight-faced solemn style of American
journalism", Palast is making few friends in American
political and corporate circles as he is emerging as an
intelligent and confident voice of the people whose
opinions rarely make it into American media. His work is
garnering support from a variety of quarters, including
filmmaker Michael Moore, Hustler magazine, and Dead
Kennedys singer and punk icon Jello Biafra. The funny
thing is, this was never his intent.
American
media asleep at the helm In Palast's own words,
"bad luck" pushed him into the field of journalism.
After obtaining his Master's in business and economics
from the University of Chicago, Palast found employment
as an investigator of white-collar crimes in the US and
Europe. His early accomplishments include negotiating
contracts for United Steelworkers Union in Chicago and
helping found a consumer advocacy group in Peru. In
1988, Palast directed the US government's investigation
of a nuclear plant builder in which the jury awarded the
largest racketeering penalty in American history. After
the Exxon Valdez oil spill in 1989, Palast was hired by
native Chugach Alaskans who wanted someone representing
their interests to investigate America's worst
environmental disaster.
While most people
remember the finger being pointed at Valdez captain
Joseph Hazelwood, Palast found that there was more to
the story than a ship captain who enjoyed a frequent
tipple of the hard stuff: the ship's radar system had
been broken for more than a year. What's more, the
ship's third mate was at the helm while Hazelwood was
below the deck fast asleep.
"We were all told
that it happened because the captain was drunk," Palast
said over the phone, his voice taking the tone it does
whenever he states "official" versions of events which
he has discredited. "It was declared to be a result of
'human error', but what it really was was a case of
corporate penny pinching leading to disaster."
Palast attempted to get his findings into the
American media, but there were no takers. The version of
the accident as explained by Exxon and British
Petroleum, who had their images and large amounts of
money at stake, was enough for the mainstream media.
This didn't sit well with Palast, who felt that
if he didn't get the word about the radar system
out, nobody would. He finally did in 1999 - 10 years later
in the London Observer after having already contributed
a few similar corporate exposes to the publication.
One year earlier, in 1998, Palast was awarded
Britain's highest journalism honor for his
undercover investigation of influence peddling within
Prime Minister Tony Blair's cabinet by American
corporations, including Enron. By the end of the 1990s, Palast
had made the jump from investigator to
investigative journalist.
Challenging the
Foxification of American media In the aftermath
of the terrorist attacks of September 11, fresh off of
his award-winning investigation of the manipulation of
the Florida ballot count which gave George W Bush his
father's old job, Palast decided to take a look into
what was being done by the US government to get to the
bottom of the biggest intelligence failure in US
history.
In November 2001, Palast discovered
that the Bush administration was blocking federal probes
into both the bin Laden family and the Saudi royal
family. The findings he presented in his report on BBC
Newsnight didn't make it into mainstream media across
the Atlantic until recent weeks - almost two years later
- via a report issued by Republican Thomas H Kean,
former New Jersey governor and chairman of the
independent commission on September 11, and former
Representative Lee Hamilton, an Indiana Democrat and
vice-chairman of the commission. The report said that
the Justice Department and Pentagon were not providing
enough information to the commission's investigation.
The Bush administration initially opposed the creation
of the commission.
"It's taken two years, and
it's only coming out now because some white Republicans
are saying it," Palast said. "Before then, it couldn't
get reported in the US." Palast is disappointed, but not
surprised, by what he perceives as US newspapers
functioning more as distributors of information that is
given to them, rather than aggressively trying to find
and pursue leads on their own. "Why aren't papers trying
to find that material for themselves?"
Palast
emphasized that he does not subscribe to any notion
espousing the idea that the Bush administration is
suppressing September 11-related information because of
any foreknowledge of the attacks on the World Trade
Center and the Pentagon. "Bush did not know of the
attack in advance, but the investigations are being
blocked because the United States government has
slavishly protected the Saudi royal family."
For
observers of the US since September 11, the compliance
of the American media has played a pivotal role in
stoking patriotic fervor which has given the Bush
administration the benefit of the doubt several times,
while failing to represent the voices of Americans who
see things differently - including Palast.
For
Palast, the state of alarm in the US since the attacks
of September 11 is not necessarily unwarranted, but it
conveniently serves the interests of the ruling elite.
"America was attacked by maniacs. Our president didn't
do anything to prevent it and hasn't done anything
since. The truth is America is still a safe place - but
the administration doesn't like that image because they
think it's easier to control people when they're
afraid."
While many pundits state that the
popularity of Bush is vulnerable to US troop casualties
in Iraq, Palast insists that American voters are
unlikely to remove Bush from office over anything but
domestic concerns - the sputtering US economy in
particular. "I think Bush will have a difficult time
getting re-elected," Palast said, "Once the yellow
ribbons fall off of the trees, people will start to
wonder where their pensions have gone."
Palast
noted that US unemployment is at its highest since the
presidency of George H W Bush, according to the current
Bush administration's figures. Palast said that the
administration intentionally released the new
unemployment data on the Fourth of July in order to
minimize press coverage.
Palast cited the story
attributed to the recovery of Private Jessica Lynch as
another example of unquestioning media obedience. "They
swallowed the whole PR sausage," he said. The majority
of world media has not demonstrated the American media's
appetite for Pentagon sausage. Practically every other
media outlet in the world describes the "rescue" of
Lynch as an unnecessary Hollywood-style raid on an Iraqi
hospital that was treating the injured soldier's wounds.
Amid the current media focus on Bush's State of
the Union address in January in which he said that
Saddam Hussein was attempting to acquire uranium from
Niger, Palast said that there has yet to be a major
change in coverage of the administration by mainstream
US media. "Occasionally backing up is done under the
pretense of being 'balanced' - this is pretense, it's
not real," he said.
Palast is obviously dismayed
by American media in the post-September 11 age,
characterizing it as "gone to hell in a handbag". Palast
views news in the US, television in particular, as being
disproportionately affected by the rise of Rupert
Murdoch's Fox News. "It's 'Foxification', they've gone
from news to viciousness, barely disguised racism and
pseudoentertainment intended to be taken as news - and
every station is now trying to follow that formula," he
said.
From the tone of his voice and the words
he chooses, it can be easily gleaned that Palast's
opinion of Fox News is less than positive. Likewise
Murdoch and Fox News employees such as Bill O'Reilly
and Sean Hannity in all likelihood have little love for
Palast. This did not prevent the network, which
constantly reminds viewers that its content is "fair and
balanced", from inviting Palast to be a guest on a show
which featured a studio audience. Palast laughed, "They
brought me out for about five minutes, and I was booed
the whole time."
Palast, however, seems to have
reveled in having appeared on the network whose message
he is working to counter. "My appearance on Fox seemed
to be for the purpose of beating me up, but that's okay
- let them do it. Some people will still get the word,"
he said - a challenge reminiscent of Bush's recent
taunting of Iraqi guerrilla forces to "bring it on".
Battling the blackout Palast's new
book, The Best Democracy Money Can Buy: An
Investigative Reporter Exposes The Truth About
Globalization, Corporate Cons and High-Finance
Fraudsters, has been on the New York Times
bestseller list for the 20 weeks since its release.
While this is not an unheard-of achievement for a book,
it is a significant accomplishment for a book that has
essentially not been reviewed or advertised anywhere in
the mainstream American media.
"While the
mainstream media would love to block it out, it has been
very well received in America - people are fed up with
brain-dead infotainment " Palast said. Palast also cited
the influence of outspoken filmmaker Michael Moore as
providing a boon to his book sales. "He [Moore] has been
extremely helpful to me in breaking through".
To
counter the blackout of The Best Democracy Money Can
Buy, Palast set out on a 10-week, 27-city speaking
tour to support the book. "The tour was received
excitedly - it was very heartening", Palast added,
saying that with the book's recent translation into
Japanese and a Chinese version on the way, he plans an
East Asian book tour in the near future.
For
Palast, after years of investigating corruption and
being blacked out of his own country's media, the US
book tour was a refreshing eye-opener. "I learned to
like America again. It isn't the same country that is
presented to us and the world by bubblehead politicians
and fake-hair news," he said. "Americans aren't happy
with the current oligarchy."
Palast said that
working Americans see through schemes such as the
proposed removal of the inheritance tax or Bush's recent
tax cut for what they really are. "The average American
recognizes it as theft," he said.
Iraq and
the next war Finished with the book tour, and
working on an edited US version of his investigation
into the Bush dynasty which aired on the BBC under the
name "Bush Family Fortunes" ("America can't take it
straight up," he said), what is Palast up to next?
"I have a document from before the war, an
official State Department document about the plan for
Iraq's economy. This includes the privatization of the
oil industry. The plan is essentially to turn Iraq into
a corporate Disneyland," Palast said. "If that oil is
privatized as planned, the Middle East will catch fire,"
he said. "The question is, who wrote this document?"
Since my interview with Palast, he has named one
member of the Iraqi "Disneyland". Palast has said that
Hilary Rosen, chief executive of the Recording Industry
Association of America (RIAA), is helping draft
copyright legislation for the new administration in
Iraq. Currently in the US, the RIAA is using the
judicial system to hunt down fileswappers it deems
guilty of violating copyright laws. Interestingly
enough, none of the accused are America Online
subscribers - AOL/Time Warner happens to be an RIAA
member. Palast has declared Madonna to be the winner of
the Iraq war.
As for speculation on the Bush
administration's next target in its "war on terror",
Palast predicted that Bush's next war will not be Iran
or Syria, but Venezuela or Nigeria - for reasons of oil
and geopolitics.
Palast has already written
about the negative and one-sided Western media coverage
of President Hugo Chavez, and has interviewed the
politician regarding the coup attempt against him, which
Palast believes was connected to Chavez's attempts to
strengthen the Organization of Petroleum Exporting
Countries (OPEC), of which Venezuela is a member. As for
oil-rich Nigeria, Palast said that the Bush
administration will attempt to "solidify its control on
the country as the French and British surround that
nation".
A journalist who is frequently the only
person in his field saying what he says, Palast said
people frequently take issue when he challenges the
veracity of administration claims and corporate reports.
"People come up to me and say, 'If this isn't true, then
why haven't I read about it in the New York Times'?"
Palast paused - and let a small laugh escape.
"My answer is, 'You will'."
Greg Palast is an investigative
reporter for BBC-TV and the author of The Best Democracy
Money Can Buy: An Investigative Reporter Exposes The
Truth About Globalization, Corporate Cons and
High-Finance Fraudsters. His writings can be found at
www.GregPalast.com.
(Copyright 2003 Asia
Times Online Co, Ltd. All rights reserved. Please
contact content@atimes.com for
information on our sales and syndication policies.)
|