Search Asia Times

Advanced Search

 
Front Page

Losing battle in war on terror finances
By Mark Berniker

NEW YORK - While US President George W Bush is quick to champion his administration's achievements in the "war on terror" ahead of elections later this year, he neglects to mention the problems that the US and other countries are having in actually choking the financial transactions of terrorists worldwide.

US and other troops continue to be killed in Iraq and Afghanistan, and terrorist acts persist from Gaza to Riyadh, via Istanbul. Serious questions, therefore, still need to be asked about whether the Bush administration and its allies are utilizing effective tactics in their attempts to stymie terrorists from getting their hands on money, car bombs and other destructive materiel.

Nearly two-and-half years after September 11, the US and its coalition partners continue to monitor financial institutions and global money networks in an effort to stop the flow of funds between financiers and terror's foot soldiers.

Many of the financial investigators are scanning bank records around the world for transactions that may look fishy, but some say that may not be the best way to fight this flank in the "war on terror". Experts say that the bulk of the terrorists' financial moves are made in cash through runners, smugglers and underground markets. Now, new questions are being asked in the US Senate Finance Committee, if the Bush administration's efforts to stem the tide of terrorist finances are actually working.

Senator Charles Grassley of Iowa and Senator Max Baucus of Montana have written two letters to the Bush administration's Internal Revenue Service and the Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Asset Control (OFAC) addressing some potential inadequacies in Bush's policies. The two Senators want information produced by these offices on the tax records of more than two dozen Muslim charities operating around the world, and also a number of details from the Treasury's OFAC on terror groups and individuals, as well as the funds they have seized.

Specifically, the US Senate Finance Committee has asked the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) for tax records of the Muslim charities and groups which could possibly have connections to non-governmental organizations and possible links to terrorist networks.

"Many of these groups not only enjoy tax-exempt status, but their reputations as charities and foundations often allows them to escape scrutiny, making it easier to hide and move their funds to other groups and individuals who threaten our national security," committee chairman Charles Grassley of Iowa and ranking Democrat Baucus said in a December 22 letter to the IRS, the US's federal tax collection agency. The letter was made public on January 14 in a finance committee news release, and includes requests for the organizations' tax returns, donor lists, applications for tax-exempt status, and all materials from examinations, audits and criminal investigations. It is unclear if the Bush administration will provide details for the Senators, or if they will hide behind the veil that they can't disclose that information on grounds it would threaten national security.

An attachment to the letter names 25 specific organizations, including Global Relief Foundation, Benevolence International Foundation, Islamic Association for Palestine and the Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development. The Senators additionally ask for IRS information on all charities, foundations and tax-exempt organizations that have been designated since September 11, 2001 as having links to terrorist networks by the Treasury Department's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC). Grassley and Baucus asked the IRS to deliver the requested information to the Senate by February 20.

And on December 22 last year, another letter obtained recently from the Senate finance committee, says that Grassley and Baucus wrote to Richard Newcomb, the director of the Treasury's OFAC. The letter has a long list of questions that it would like OFAC to address, including the speed and efficacy of the Treasury's activities in locating, freezing and preventing financial transfers between terrorist organization and the individuals and entities supporting their destructive activities. The Senators expect a written response from OFAC some time in February.

"By eliminating terrorists' access to funding, we're eliminating their ability to harm our country. As ranking member of the finance committee, I'm working to make sure that the Treasury Department's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) is fully engaged in sealing any leak that allows terrorists to get a hold of funding. I look forward to receiving OFAC's response and am hopeful that we'll find that the office is being as vigilant as possible in helping to prevent terrorist activities," Baucus told Asia Times Online.

There is no question that exhaustive efforts are being made to stop terrorist groups from getting their hands on funds, moving those funds around the world and translating that economic wherewithal into strikes against a Humvee on a Baghdad highway, or a bank in Istanbul.

The Treasury says that it has shut down the banking activities of more than 281 individuals or entities garnering close to US$138 million, with $36.4 million being seized within the US, and the other $101.6 million from financial institutions around the world. There is no question that the Bush administration's Executive Order 13224 has improved Treasury investigators' ability to track and ultimately seize millions of dollars in funds, but some say the moves are too little, too late.

The General Accounting Office (GAO), the investigative arm of Congress, recently issued a report stating that US law enforcement officials don't have a firm grip on how terrorists go about moving their money around the globe. The report went onto criticize the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), which it says does not "systematically collect or analyze" terrorist financial data. The GAO report said both the US Justice and Treasury departments are more than a year behind in devising a strategy for uncovering terrorist assets, and techniques such as using gold, diamonds and other commodities like honey to hide assets and financial transfers.

And within the Bush administration, a tension is emerging between the Justice Department's FBI and the Treasury's OFAC. While the FBI is more of a policing and investigative arm of Justice, Treasury has the financial experts and forensic accounting specialists, who some say have a better understanding of how money moves and ways to stop it.

But while the challenge is immense, the pressure is building on the Bush administration to respond to the charges that it is not doing all it could to hit hard against terrorist finances. From all indications, al-Qaeda and other terrorist groups still have formidable financial resources.

One leading expert questions whether the fight against terrorist finances is being fought in the best manner. Radio Singapore International recently broadcast an interview with Rohan Gunaratna, the author of Inside al-Qaeda: Global Network of Terror and a leading terrorism specialist at the Singapore-based Institute of Defense and Strategic Studies. He said: "There has been very little success overall in the world in the fight against terrorist finance." Gunaratna goes on to say that while governments continue to target the formal banking infrastructure, much of terrorist financing flows through hawalal and other informal methods of money transfer.

No one would accuse Bush, British Prime Minister Tony Blair or any of their European, Middle Eastern, African or Asian allies from not trying to squeeze the financial networks of terrorists around the globe, but ultimately their gameplan isn't working. The "war on terror" in Bush's eyes doesn't seem to have an end, his advisers believe he has leverage in national security affairs as his re-election campaign kicks off in earnest.

Perhaps, some suggest, more resources should be devoted to using unconventional methods and intelligence schemes to infiltrate informal terrorist financial transfers, arms exchanges and preventing terrorists from packing cars with loads of explosives ready to be detonated at a moment's notice.

Mark Berniker is a New York-based freelance journalist who writes about global terrorism and Eurasian geopolitics.

(Copyright 2004 Asia Times Online Ltd. All rights reserved. Please contact content@atimes.com for information on our sales and syndication policies.)
 
Jan 22, 2004



How charity begins in Saudi Arabia
(Jan 16, '04)

 

 
   
       
No material from Asia Times Online may be republished in any form without written permission.
Copyright 2003, Asia Times Online, 4305 Far East Finance Centre, 16 Harcourt Rd, Central, Hong Kong