Search Asia Times

Advanced Search

 
Front Page

Heavyweight rebuke for Bush's foreign policy
By Andrew Tully

WASHINGTON - The 26 former US diplomats and military leaders who were due to issue a joint statement on Wednesday accusing President George W Bush of hurting American foreign policy includes former ambassadors appointed by presidents from both major US political parties and retired career military leaders.

Some members of the group, called "Diplomats and Military Commanders for Change", are quoted in newspapers as saying Bush's policies have undone the diplomatic results they and their colleagues have worked hard to achieve during their careers. They are also reportedly urging Americans to vote Bush out of office in November.

Specifically, they cite the US-led war in Iraq, which they call unilateral, and the now-strained alliances with countries such as France and Germany. The Iraq war put the United States at odds with many of its closest allies. Admiral Stansfield Turner, a former director of the Central Intelligence Agency and Admiral William Crowe, a former chairman of the US military's joint chiefs of staff, are part of the group. Another member, Phyllis Oakley, a former state department official, has commented: "What has caused us to speak out in what could be seen as a partisan or political way is simply our deep, deep concern about the future security of the United States."

The group's statement comes two months after a similar criticism was issued by former British diplomats. They criticized their prime minister, Tony Blair, for his close alignment with Bush's foreign policy.

The US group says it was not formed to provide support for Democratic Senator John Kerry, who is expected to challenge Bush for the presidency in November. It says its members simply want to alert voters to what they believe is "the damage Bush's policies have done to America's long-standing alliances and hard-won prestige".

Bush's re-election campaign has refused to respond to the group until the release of its statement, but an anonymous strategist for Bush's Republican Party, in an interview with the Los Angeles Times, expressed bewilderment at the charge of unilateralism.

The strategist cited the unanimous vote by the United Nations Security Council on June 8 in favor of a US-drafted resolution on the transfer of sovereignty to Iraqis at the end of the June. He expressed doubt that the group's statement would influence voting in the upcoming November 2 election.

Larry Sabato agrees. Sabato is a political analyst at the University of Virginia. He tells RFE/RL the group may appear to be bipartisan, but it is heavily weighted toward the Democratic Party. Many, he says, are known to be Democratic partisans, despite their previous affiliation with the Republican Party.

Sabato singled out Crowe, who was chairman of the joint chiefs of staff under both president Ronald Reagan and the current president's father, president George H W Bush, both Republicans. He later supported president Bill Clinton, a Democrat, and has endorsed Kerry's challenge of Bush in the coming election.

Sabato says, "I looked carefully at that list. It's heavily laden with Democrats or Republicans who defected some time ago. For example, [one of them is] Admiral Crowe, who turned on [the first president Bush] back in 1992 and endorsed Clinton over the man he had served - president Bush - and was awarded with the ambassadorship to Great Britain."

Sabato dismisses the group's assertion that it does not endorse Kerry. "Just because these people are not working on a daily basis for Kerry or formally advising him doesn't mean they're not for him. It's a very partisan thing, and it's perfectly all right. It's a partisan election year. But to present it as being non-partisan or some kind of trend is, I think, taking it way too far," Sabato says.

But Alan Lichtman, a professor of political history at American University in Washington, says he believes there is such a trend. Lichtman tells RFE/RL he sees evidence of a global movement - both among voters and political elites - against ruling parties, particularly those that supported the war in Iraq. He says he thinks that sentiment is shared by a growing number of Americans.

He says groups like Diplomats and Military Commanders for Change are speaking out because they see Bush ignoring old alliances and relying on US military power to back up unilateralist policies. Lichtman says, in his opinion, these retired diplomats and military leaders are right in believing Bush is squandering the hard work to which they have devoted their careers.

"Bush has fundamentally changed American foreign policy. The pre-emptive doctrine is radically new in the way Bush is applying it. And obviously, when you change policy this radically, it is going to have enormous repercussions around the world and, of course, in the United States, because you challenge presumptions held by policymakers and public officials for some time," Lichtman says.

Lichtman rejects the Republican strategist's argument that the way the US acted in Iraq had the support of other countries and that it is building even broader support for its occupation of Iraq through the UN.

"The fact that now, during this very difficult period, the United States has been able to get a UN resolution on the transfer of power to Iraqis does not in any way undermine the essentially unilateral thrust of American policy in Iraq and the broader unilateralism followed by this administration, which has rejected a number of international treaties," Lichtman says.

Lichtman cites the rejection of the Kyoto treaty on the environment, the US withdrawal from the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty, and its 18-month imposition of tariffs on imported steel, which punished many US trading partners, including the European Union.

The signatories:
Avis T Bohlen, Bush Jr's former assistant secretary of state for arms control.
Admiral William J Crowe, chairman of the joint chiefs of staff under Reagan and ambassador to the UK under Clinton; has endorsed Kerry.
Jeffrey S Davidow, Bush Jr's former ambassador to Mexico.
William A DePree, ex-ambassador to Bangladesh.
Donald B Easum, ex-ambassador to Nigeria.
Charles W Freeman, ex-ambassador to Saudi Arabia.
William C Harrop, Bush Sr's ambassador to Israel.
Arthur A Hartman, ex-ambassador to the Soviet Union and France.
General Joseph P Hoar, commander in chief of US Central Command under Bush Sr; supports John Kerry.
H Allen Holmes, ex-special operations chief.
Robert V Keeley, ex-ambassador to Greece and Zimbabwe.
Samuel W Lewis, ex-ambassador to Israel.
Princeton N Lyman, ex-ambassador to South Africa.
Jack F Matlock, ambassador to the USSR under Reagan and Bush Sr.
Donald F McHenry, ex-ambassador to the UN.
General Merrill A McPeak, former Air Force chief of staff; supports Kerry.
George E Moose, ex-African affairs chief.
David D Newsom, former acting secretary of state.
Phyllis E Oakley, ex-intelligence and research chief.
James Daniel Phillips, ex-ambassador to Africa.
John E Reinhardt, ex-ambassador to Nigeria.
General William Y Smith, ex-deputy commander in chief, US European Command.
Ronald I Spiers, ex-senior UN official and ambassador to Pakistan.
Michael Sterner, ex-ambassador in the Middle East.
Admiral Stansfield Turner, CIA director under Carter; has endorsed Kerry.
Alexander F Watson, ex-assistant secretary of state for Inter-American affairs.

Copyright (c) 2004, RFE/RL Inc. Reprinted with the permission of Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, 1201 Connecticut Ave NW, Washington DC 20036


Jun 17, 2004



Rebuild or retreat: America's dilemma
(Jun 16, '04)

Bush just doesn't get it ...
(Jun 11, '04)

 

 
   
       
No material from Asia Times Online may be republished in any form without written permission.
Copyright 2003, Asia Times Online, 4305 Far East Finance Centre, 16 Harcourt Rd, Central, Hong Kong