WRITE for ATol ADVERTISE MEDIA KIT GET ATol BY EMAIL ABOUT ATol CONTACT US
Asia Time Online - Daily News
             
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese



    Front Page
     Aug 28, 2009
Page 1 of 2
Libya: A hero's welcome
By Scott Stewart and Fred Burton

On August 24, Scottish Justice Secretary Kenny MacAskill addressed a special session of the Scottish parliament. The session was called so that MacAskill could explain why he had decided to release Abdel Basset Ali al-Megrahi, the former Libyan intelligence officer convicted of terrorism charges in connection with the bombing of Pan Am Flight 103, and who had been expected to spend the rest of his life in prison. MacAskill said he granted Megrahi a compassionate release because Megrahi 

 
suffers from terminal prostate cancer and is expected to live only a few months.

The August 20 release of Megrahi ignited a firestorm of outrage in both the United Kingdom and the United States. Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) director Robert Mueller released to the press contents of an uncharacteristically blunt and critical letter he had written to MacAskill in which Mueller characterized Megrahi's release as inexplicable and "detrimental to the cause of justice". Mueller told MacAskill in the letter that the release "makes a mockery of the rule of law".

The flames of outrage over the release of Megrahi were further fanned when Megrahi received a hero's welcome on his arrival in Tripoli - video of him being welcomed and embraced by Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi was broadcast all over the world.

For his part, Gaddafi has long lobbied for Megrahi's release, even while taking steps to end Libya's status as an international pariah. Gaddafi first renounced terrorism and his nuclear ambitions in 2003, shortly after the United States invasion of Iraq. In October 2008, he completed the compensation agreement with the families of the US victims of the December 1988 bombing of Pan Am 103 and of an April 1986 Libyan attack against the La Belle disco in Berlin.

Yet despite the conviction of Megrahi, the 2003 official admission of Libyan responsibility for the Pan Am bombing in a letter to the United Nations, and the agreement to pay compensation to the families of the Pan Am victims, Gaddafi has always maintained in public statements that Megrahi and Libya were not responsible for the bombing. The official admission of responsibility for the Pan Am bombing, coupled with the public denials, has resulted in a great deal of ambiguity and confusion over the authorship of the attack - which, in all likelihood, is precisely what the denials were intended to do.

The Pan Am 103 investigation
At 7:03 pm on December 21, 1988, an improvised explosive device (IED) detonated in one of Pan Am Flight 103's cargo containers, causing the plane to break apart and fall from the sky. The 259 passengers and crew members aboard the flight died, as did 11 residents of Lockerbie, Scotland, the town where the remnants of the jumbo jet fell.

Immediately following the bombing, there was suspicion that the Iranians or Syrians had commissioned the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine General Command (PFLP-GC) to conduct the bombing. This belief was based on the fact that German authorities had taken down a large PFLP-GC cell in Frankfurt in October 1988 and that one member of the cell had in his possession an IED concealed inside a Toshiba radio. Frankfurt is the city where Pan Am 103 departed before stopping in London. Indeed, even today, there are still some people who believe that the PFLP-GC was commissioned by either the Iranian or the Syrian government to conduct the Pan Am bombing.

The PFLP-GC theory might eventually have become the officially accepted theory had the bomb on Pan Am 103 detonated (as planned) while the aircraft was over the North Atlantic Ocean. However, a delay in the plane's departure from London resulted in the timed device detonating while the aircraft was still over land, and this allowed authorities to collect a great deal of evidence that had been scattered across a wide swath of the Scottish countryside. The search effort was one of the most complex crime-scene investigations ever conducted.

Through months of painstakingly detailed effort, investigators were able to determine that the aircraft was brought down by an IED containing a main charge of Semtex, that the IED had been placed inside a Toshiba radio cassette player (in a macabre coincidence, that particular model of Toshiba, the RT-SF 16, is called the "BomBeat radio cassette player"), and that the radio had been located inside a brown Samsonite hard-side suitcase located inside the cargo container.

Investigators were also able to trace the clothing inside the suitcase containing the IED to a specific shop, Mary's House, in Sliema, Malta. While examining one of the pieces of Maltese clothing in May 1989, investigators found a fragment of a circuit board that did not match anything found in the Toshiba radio. It is important to remember that in a bombing, the pieces of the IED do not entirely disappear. They may be shattered and scattered, but they are not usually completely vaporized. Although some pieces may be damaged beyond recognition, others are not, and this often allows investigators to reconstruct the device.

In mid-1990, after an exhaustive effort to identify the circuit-board fragment, the FBI laboratory in Washington was able to determine that the circuit board was very similar to one that came from a timer that a special agent with the US Diplomatic Security Service had recovered from an arms cache while investigating a Libyan-sponsored coup attempt in Lome, Togo, in 1986.

Further investigation determined that the company that produced the timers, the Swiss company MEBO, had sold as many as 20 of the devices to the Libyan government, and that the Libyan government was the company's primary customer. Interestingly, in 1988, MEBO rented one of its offices in Zurich to a firm called ABH, which was run by two Libyan intelligence officers: Abdel Basset Ali al-Megrahi and Badri Hassan.

The MEBO timer, model MST-13, is very different from the ice-cube timer in the PFLP-GC device found in Frankfurt in October 1988. Additionally, the ice-cube timer in the PFLP-GC device was used in conjunction with a barometric pressure switch, and the IED used a different main charge, TNT, instead of the Semtex used in the Pan Am 103 device.

Perhaps the fact that does the most damage to the PFLP-GC conspiracy theory is that the principal bombmaker for the PFLP-GC Frankfurt cell (and the man who made the PFLP-GC Toshiba device), Marwan Khreesat, was actually an infiltrator sent into the organization by the Jordanian intelligence service. Khreesat not only assisted in providing the information that allowed the Germans to take down the cell, but he was under strict orders by his Jordanian handlers to ensure that every IED he constructed was not capable of detonating. Therefore, it is extremely unlikely that one of the IEDs he created was used to destroy Pan Am 103.
One of the Libyans connected to MEBO, Megrahi, is an interesting figure. Not only was he an officer with Libyan intelligence, the External Security Organization, or ESO, but he also served as the chief of security for Libyan Arab Airlines (LAA) and had visited Malta many times. The owner of the Mary's House clothing shop in Sliema identified Megrahi as the man who purchased the clothing found in the suitcase, and Maltese immigration records indicated that Megrahi was in Malta on December 7, 1988, the time that the clothing was purchased. Megrahi left Malta on December 9, 1988, but returned to the country using a false identity on December 20, using a passport issued by the ESO in the name of Ahmed Khalifa Abdusamad. Megrahi left Malta using the Abdusamad passport on December 21, 1988, the day the suitcase was apparently sent from Malta aboard Air Malta Flight KM180 to Frankfurt and then transferred to Pan Am 103.

On November 13, 1991, the British government charged Megrahi and Lamin Khalifah Fhimah, the LAA station manager at Luqa Airport in Malta, with the bombing. One day later, a federal grand jury in the United States returned an indictment against the same two men for the crime. In March 1995, the FBI added the two men to its most wanted list and the Diplomatic Security Service's Rewards for Justice Program offered a US$4 million reward for their capture. Megrahi and Fhimah were placed under house arrest in Libya - a comfortable existence that, more than actually confining them, served to protect them from being kidnapped and spirited out of Libya to face trial.

After many years of boycotts, embargoes, United Nations resolutions and diplomatic wrangling - including extensive efforts by South African president Nelson Mandela and UN secretary general Kofi Annan - a compromise was reached and all parties agreed to a trial in a neutral country - the Netherlands - conducted under Scottish law. On April 5, 1999, Megrahi and Fhimah were transferred to Camp Zeist in the Netherlands to stand trial before a special panel of Scottish judges.

On January 31, 2001, after a very long trial that involved an incredible amount of technical and detailed testimony, the judges reached their decision. The Scottish judges acquitted Fhimah, 

Continued 1 2  


Lockerbie deal leaves no clean hands (Aug 25, '09)


1.
Down the drain

2. Chinese troops offer an Afghan solution

3. A United States-Iran opportunity arises

4. The truth is adrift with the Arctic Sea

5. Basket cases

6. Leaked stories taint Iran nuclear debate

7. A country dividing

8. China's space pioneer under the microscope

9. Iraq burns its bridges with Syria

10. Singapore faces a 'silver tsunami'

(24 hours to 11:59pm ET, Aug 26, 2009)

 
 



All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
© Copyright 1999 - 2009 Asia Times Online (Holdings), Ltd.
Head Office: Unit B, 16/F, Li Dong Building, No. 9 Li Yuen Street East, Central, Hong Kong
Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110