WRITE for ATol ADVERTISE MEDIA KIT GET ATol BY EMAIL ABOUT ATol CONTACT US
Asia Time Online - Daily News
             
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese




    Front Page
     Nov 10, 2012


Transformation of the American mind
By Dinesh Sharma

With President Barack Obama's reelection it is increasingly clear, as I have argued in my book Barack Obama in Hawaii and Indonesia: The Making of a Global President, that the American mind is in the midst of a transformation, driven by several long-term demographic and cultural shifts. In many ways, Obama's successful marketing of his biracial and multicultural biography 

 
mirrors the social and demographic change already underway in this country.

The Obama win may not have been possible without the ethnic voting blocks that he gathered in large numbers from the African American, Hispanic and Asian voters (Todd, 2009). Does the Obama election represent the full-fledges triumph of multiculturalism over and above the "culture wars" of the 1990s? I believe this is one of the clear outcomes of the historic 2008 and 2012 election.

The results from the 2012 re-election have only confirmed this trend. The American electorate is changing its colors and hues, remaking the American dream, and will fundamentally change the world. As the president said, "I believe we can keep the promise of our founding, the idea that if you're willing to work hard, it doesn't matter who you are or where you come from or what you look like or where you love. It doesn't matter whether you're black or white or Hispanic or Asian or Native American or young or old or rich or poor, abled, disabled, gay or straight. You can make it here in America if you're willing to try."

There will be a push back, however, from the other side. "The dark side" has not been defeated yet, as Jedi master Yoda would say; they are simply regrouping.

American multiculturalism redux
Samuel Huntington predicted this correctly (2005). He identified several important micro-trends that are reshaping the fabric of American society. Loss of the Soviet empire as a traditional adversary led to allegiances to sub-cultural or sub-national interest groups based on ethnicity and language. Liberal calls for a great multicultural revolution as the third revolution that would follow the American Revolution and the Civil Rights Revolution hit new heights. The new immigration laws of the 1960s allowed for the first time individuals from Latin America and Asia to come to this country in any numbers. All of these trends have led to a major demographic change in the US.

He also believed that American identity will swing back and forth in the coming decades between various positions:
1. A multicultural position with an ideological allegiance to a creed in the founding documents and principles;
2. An exclusionist stance with the white majority backlash;
3. A bifurcated alignment along Anglo and Hispanic lines; and
4. A nativist or cultural move with a return to Protestant values, culture and ethics.

With the Obama election, we have already seen several of these positions playing out in the American electorate. Anyone who noted the backdrop of the two candidates during their speeches witnessed the two Americas, one diverse and the other homogenous.

America's impressive human capital, a necessary pre-condition for fighting the challenges of globalization, was at display during the 2008 election. The Democratic delegates were 43% minority, 25% African American, and consisted of more women than men. This diversity was forward looking, an early sign of the demographic changes that will sweep this country by mid-century, according to the latest report from the US Census Bureau (Sharma 2008).

In the 2012 election, 96% of African Americans are estimated to have voted for the president, 71% of Hispanic Americans, and 73% of Asian Americans. Combined with the strong women's vote (55%), Obama was able to carry the day in the key swing states.

The idea of "cultural pluralism" has been espoused by a long line of Western thinkers, including James, Dewey and Bourne, which has led to multiculturalism as a policy in several Western countries, such as Canada and Australia.

In America, continuous immigration has been a cornerstone of the society and economy, which in an earlier era gave rise to the idea of "the melting pot" (Norgren and Nanda, 2006). While cultural assimilation formed the basis of the melting pot with previous waves of immigration, it no longer holds the same power over the American population (Jacoby, 2004).

The immigration policies set forth in the 1960s by the Kennedy and Johnson administrations have led to a major influx of new immigrants. While we are celebrating the first African American president, Obama is also the first multicultural head of state of any Western democracy. Even though Canada and Australia have spearheaded multiculturalism as an official policy of the state, it is America that has taken the lead in electing a multicultural leader to the highest office in the land.

However, multiculturalism has come under serious attack throughout Europe and in other parts of the world in the post-9/11 world (Oxford Analytica, 2006). The criticism that multiculturalism, especially as portrayed by some Muslim youth, is not in consonance with the Western secular values and freedoms is at the heart of this attack.

In Europe, multiculturalism is considered a high-brow elitist idea constructed by armchair liberal thinkers, and European countries are pulling back, , suggesting that cultural policies related to bilingualism and education in the schools and workplace keep immigrants from embracing Western democratic ideals and values.

In a rapidly globalizing world, does multiculturalism offer distinct advantages that the world cannot do without? Is the American brand of multiculturalism, which as the historian Ronald Takaki has argued may be something inherent in its DNA (Takaki, 1993), a distinct strength in business and geopolitics? Have Americans elected a diverse leader for diverse times precisely because the history of the American people is multicultural and diverse at the core, shaped by the indigenous Indian and African-American populations?

The returns from the 2012 election would suggest that the American people have stared into the abyss and made a quantum leap of consciousness. They have confirmed that they are all in this together. "We are greater than the sum of our individual ambitions and we remain more than a collection of red states and blue states," Obama said.

'We're all multiculturalists now'
Several years ago, I heard the well-known sociologist Nathan Glazer present a lecture at Harvard University about the virtues of multiculturalism, titled "We're All Multiculturalists Now" (Glazer, 1996). Almost a generation ago as one of the younger members of the New York intellectuals, Glazer with Daniel Moynihan had co-authored the well-known report, "Beyond the Melting Pot", documenting the melding of changing ethnic identities in New York City. Yet, during this lecture he argued that the assimilation policies of the melting pot era had not worked for the traditional minority groups and that the evidence was undisputable.

John Ogbu, the Nigerian-born Berkeley anthropologist, based his life's work on the cultural theory that the achievement gap between "voluntary" and "involuntary" minorities compared with the majority population formed the basis of a caste-like system in American society (Ogbu, 1978). Involuntary minorities consist of African-Americans and American-Indians, the traditional ethnic groups who by default do not have an alternative homeland. Voluntary minorities, on the other hand, consist of the new immigrants, such as, the Chinese-Americans, Indian-Americans and other ethnic groups.

Involuntary minorities tend to perform poorly on achievement tests compared with the majority population. Due to their "histories of self-perception" involuntary minorities interpret barriers to advancement as "institutionalized discrimination". In some parts of the country, the well-performing minority students may even carry the stigma of "acting white". Voluntary minorities, on the other hand, view challenges in this society as opportunities to be overcome.

Obama has confounded these cultural theories and stereotypes by transcending the race barriers that many African Americans feel still exist in this society (Sharma, 2008). However, Obama also represents to some degree a growing number of African immigrants, about 1 million in major US metro areas. Part and parcel of the demographic transition sweeping America, these new Africans are not descendants of slaves even though they are often lumped with the African-American population. Thus, the Obama tent consists of a broad spectrum of demographic segments.

According to Benjamin Akande, the Dean of the Webster University School of Business, some of the notable personalities of the Obama generation include several prominent Africans in America: Kwame Anthony Appiah, Wole Soyinka and Chinua Achebe in academia; Hakeem Olajuwon and Joseph Addai in sports; and Gbenga Akinnagbe and singer Akon in entertainment (Akande, 2008).

As an American of Kenyan descent, Obama's story validates Ogbu's theory that the caste-like pathologies that plague some segments of the American population can be a social barrier not evident among the new African immigrants. If race were not a real or perceived barrier, then Americans would have already narrowed the achievement gap and there would have been more African Americans in the United States Senate vying for the executive office.

Now, with the help of a transformational leader like Obama, can America uplift Ogbu's involuntary minorities across "the promise land" and shore up its human capital? The achievement gap is only one of the challenges confronting us as we move into the 21st century. "To those whom much is given, much is expected," said John F Kennedy. The progressives have gotten their man re-elected; not since F D Roosevelt has a Democrat been re-elected with more the 50% of the vote. Thus, the responsibility now falls squarely on the shoulders of the Obama Democrats - as "the torch has been passed to a new generation of Americans" - to get their agenda fully enacted to change America and the world.

Notes:
1. Todd, C. (2009). How Barack Obama Won. New York: Alfred Knopf.
2. Sharma, D. (2008). New-Blooded Americans: Obamagenomics and the End of Race
3. Jacoby, T. (2004). Reinventing the melting pot. New York: Basic Books.
4. See here
5. Takaki, R. (1993). A different mirror: a history of multicultural America. Boston: Little Brown.
6. Glazer, N. (1996). We are all multiculturalists now. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
7. Ogbu J. U. (1978). Minority Education and Caste: The American System in Cross-Cultural Perspective. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
8. Sharma, D. (2008). Post-Obama world: Can America close the achievement gap? OpEdNews.
9. Akande, B. (2008). The Obama generation.

This article is adapted from an excerpt of "Barack Obama in Hawaii and Indonesia: The Making of a Global President by Dinesh Sharma. The book was rated among the Top 10 Black history books for 2012. His next book on President Obama, Crossroads of Leadership: Globalization and American Exceptionalism in the Obama Presidency, is due to be published with Routledge Press.


(Copyright 2012 Asia Times Online (Holdings) Ltd. All rights reserved. Please contact us about sales, syndication and republishing.)





Barry Obama rides again (Nov 8, '12)

 

 
 



All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
© Copyright 1999 - 2012 Asia Times Online (Holdings), Ltd.
Head Office: Unit B, 16/F, Li Dong Building, No. 9 Li Yuen Street East, Central, Hong Kong
Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110