Global Economy

Making globalization work
By Jose Maria Figueres

DAVOS, Switzerland - Globalization is a fact. We should start by acknowledging this. With continuous advances in communications technologies, the world is more and more a global village in which opposite ends of the Earth can communicate in real time. Indeed, the fact that the World Economic Forum in Davos and the World Social Forum in Porto Alegre, Brazil, have happened at the same time is itself a demonstration of this.

It is also true that globalization is a double-edged tool. We can take advantage of it with sound national strategies designed to increase the well-being of our citizens. Or we can fold our arms and do nothing and allow globalization to take advantage of us. We have the possibility to decide and build our future, but no one will do it for us. The responsibility is ours.

Globalization is more than a simple process of economic opening and tariff reduction. Taking advantage of it requires clear policies that at the same time reinforce macro-economic stability, strengthen strategic social investment, mainly in health and education, and promote responsible use of natural resources. This can be achieved only through common efforts by all social actors - business, civil society, academics, and government - who share a vision of the country they would like to have and the society they would like to construct.

As far as globalization is concerned, it doesn't matter if a country is small or large - in marked contrast to the situation during the Cold War. What matters now is that societies organize themselves quickly and that countries are "fast" rather than "slow" to make the changes necessary to take advantage of new opportunities.

The tenor of these observations derives in part from what I was able to achieve during my years in government. When I was president of Costa Rica, the global technology firm Intel was seeking to set up a microprocessor plant outside of the United States. When its search began, Costa Rica was not even in consideration, yet it ended up being selected as the best choice. We worked hard to make this happen, with the active participation of all sectors of the country.

In its first year of operation in Costa Rica, Intel exports exceeded our total exports of coffee and bananas (we are the world's second-largest banana exporter). The country then became a magnet for other high-tech companies. Work opportunities in turn reinforced the interest of new generations in pursuing higher education and careers in technology. Thus began a virtuous circle that today includes a growing export sector in software by small national companies, a high-value-added product.

Did we persuade Intel to invest in Costa Rica by promising low-wage workers, fiscal incentives, or environmental concessions? The opposite is true:

  • Costa Rica has the highest wages in Latin America, preferring to compete instead on the basis of higher productivity, not with "hunger salaries".
  • The fiscal incentives it offers for investment are no greater than those any company receives in Ireland, Singapore or Israel. It is to be hoped that globalization will require us to harmonize taxes (raising them) to finance development adequately.
  • Costa Rica's environmental regulations are comparable to those of developed countries. What quality global firms least desire is to produce in countries with no environmental controls, particularly in a world where consumers are ever more demanding and better informed.

    Today Costa Rica plants more trees that it cuts down, sells tonnes of carbon drawn from the atmosphere, and pays small farmers for these services they provide to society. By constitutional mandate, the country invests 6 percent of its gross domestic product in public education. Certainly many challenges continue to face the country, but this is the form of globalization that we pursue.

    I have worked for two years at the World Economic Forum. Convinced that business has responsibilities to society and can play a positive role in areas relating to development, the WEF supports programs that work in this direction. Certain companies are very clear about their mission in this sense and practice it daily. Others less so. But many governments and many grassroots organizations share this understanding. After all, if development were simple, we would all be developed.

    Today it is more important than ever to join forces and move forward. The World Economic Forum and the World Social Forum share the obligation to explore their common goals and work toward them rather than accentuate their differences. This is the way to do more for those who have the least, and to work toward meeting the world's challenges.

    Jose Maria Figueres is the managing director of the World Economic Forum. He was president of Costa Rica from 1994-98.

    (Inter Press Service)
  •  
    Jan 29, 2003


    Comparative advantage: Comparative exploitation

     

    Affiliates
    Click here to be one)

     

     
       
             
    No material from Asia Times Online may be republished in any form without written permission.
    Copyright Asia Times Online, 6306 The Center, Queen’s Road, Central, Hong Kong.