WRITE for ATol ADVERTISE MEDIA KIT GET ATol BY EMAIL ABOUT ATol CONTACT US
WSI
Asia Time Online - Daily News
             
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese



     
     Sep 24, 2005
BOOK REVIEW
Follow the money

Capitalism's Achilles Heel: Dirty Money and How to Renew the Free-Market System by Raymond Baker Buy this book

Reviewed by Gary LaMoshi

Raymond Baker was a freshly minted Harvard Business School graduate when he went to Nigeria in 1961 to manage the country's oldest bakery. He admits to being sucked into petty corruption in the public and private sectors as part of doing business there over 15 years. That annoyed Baker, but it didn't affect him the way an incident many years later did.

In Nigeria, Baker's family employed a nanny named Mary, whom they brought to the US on two occasions, the last in the mid-1970s. In addition to childcare duties, she took night classes to expand her skills and returned to Nigeria



"brimming with self-confidence". Baker made a point of seeing Mary every year or two on his trips to Africa.

On a trip to Nigeria in the mid-1990s, Baker said Mary appeared to have aged 30 years in less than three. After initial pleasantries, "she fell to her knees on the floor and begged me - with her hands gripping my ankles, her head touching my feet and her tears flooding the carpet - begged me repeatedly to take her only child back to America."

Nigeria at the time was ruled by Sani Abacha, a general who seized power in 1993. Abacha managed to steal as much as $1 billion a year during his five years in office, before dying during an orgy with two other generals and three prostitutes in 1998. Abacha's theft had worked its way through the system to leave people such as Mary destitute, homeless, and worst of all, hopeless.

For Baker, that pitiful picture of Mary represents the tragedy of dirty money and the threat that inequality poses to global capitalism. In Capitalism's Achilles Heel, Baker presents a comprehensive program to stop the flow of dirty money and to revitalize capitalist philosophy the way Scottish political economist Adam Smith really intended it. Both tracks are more controversial than you might expect.

Baker is at his best discussing dirty money and its movement through the international banking system. He defines dirty money more broadly than most governments (more on that below) - as money that is illegally earned, illegally transferred or illegally utilized. Contrary to what you might believe, methods for laundering money or moving illicit profits around the globe are very simple. The three most common methods are falsifying prices of goods or services, passing money through dummy entities and faking transactions. Baker identifies a fourth category of special gimmicks, ranging from carrying cash in suitcases to arranging transfers anonymously through banks or the hawala private network (agents in different countries who trust each other and act as brokers for people to send and receive money with a phone call) that helped al-Qaeda fund the September 11 attacks in the United States.

Baker scoffs at the notion of "sophisticated" money-laundering, emphasizing that none of these methods for moving dirty money is new or very complicated. Mispricing is a common practice among multinational companies to move profits to low-tax jurisdictions, as well as corrupt dictators like Abacha to siphon off treasury funds to overseas accounts. For example, if a plane costs $1 million, Abacha had his offshore company sell it to Nigeria for $2 million. Even a couple of pennies on a million barrels of oil a day can really mount up. Baker estimates annual dirty money flows at $1-2 trillion, half of it from poor countries flowing to rich ones.

Amazingly, Western banks still welcome dirty money and compete for the business. The vaunted US crackdown on money-laundering after September 11 has left wide loopholes. The US and other rich countries make it illegal to handle proceeds of crimes committed within their borders but generally don't criminalize funds from illegal activity in other countries. So funds from the likes of Abacha, former Indonesian president Suharto, Mobutu (former president of Zaire, now the Democratic Republic of the Congo) and Russian mobsters are welcome in Western banks, no questions asked. When US banks get slapped for money-laundering, it is usually because they broke US laws in their zeal to accommodate these big customers. Baker's simplest, and most effective suggestion, is for the US to broaden its definition of dirty money to his: money that breaks laws in its origin, movement or use, without regard to where the laws are broken.

According to Baker, illegal transfers lead directly to inequality, the second threat to capitalism. Foreign aid from rich to poor countries totals $50 billion annually while $500 billion in dirty money flows from poor to rich. Baker says this imbalance is the reason that poverty alleviation efforts over the past 50 years have had so little impact. He also says these illegal fund flows should be part of the consideration for debt relief on the $2.3 trillion that poor and transitional countries owe to rich ones. He vilifies the World Bank in particular for turning a blind eye to corruption, not just regarding aid disbursements, but to the whole question of illegal outflows and the role of Western bankers in encouraging them.

The global ratio of income between the top and bottom 20% is now 31 to 1. In rich countries, the gap ranges from a multiple of 3.4 in Japan to 8.5 in the US. Baker says the 31 to 1 gap is unacceptable and unsustainable in an increasingly globalized and interdependent world. The rich, whether it's rich-country bankers or poor-country corruption beneficiaries, can't expect the poor to keep playing a game in which they fall increasingly behind.

Baker blames the tolerance and spread of this perverted form of capitalism on English philosopher Jeremy Bentham's philosophy of utilitarianism, which he claims has corrupted Adam Smith's view of free markets with an inherently moral basis. Utilitarianism has come to mean maximizing advantages to society as a whole, the greatest good for the greatest number, with the ends justifying the means and no place for justice. Utilitarianism, according to Baker, has become the unseen, unquestioned bedrock of modern global capitalism, and it's about time we took a second look at that.

Here, Baker is confronting the dominant pillar of capitalism's post-Soviet moment of triumph: free markets are the best answer. This principle drives champions of globalization, asking only that the world be made safe for Wal-Mart (see Overhyped hypermarkets, July 17, 2004), to encourage tax cuts for the wealthy as a means to economic growth. But rather than tackle it directly, Baker chooses to joust in the arena of obscure philosophy. He could use some of that courage he wishes to see from the World Bank, to face the world as it is and offer real solutions.

When Baker sticks to his knitting and takes on the key issue of dirty money and why it matters, he's masterful: witty, well informed and devastatingly on target. After reading Capitalism's Achilles Heel, when someone mentions dirty money, you won't just think of Columbia's Cali drug cartel or corrupt dictators. You'll remember poor Mary driven to her knees, and how some international banks helped put her there.

Capitalism's Achilles Heel by Raymond Baker, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey, 2005. ISBN: 0-471-64488-9. Price: US$27.95, 438 pages.

(Copyright 2005 Asia Times Online Ltd. All rights reserved. Please contact us for information on sales, syndication and republishing .)


Globalization's rabid defender (Oct 30, '04)

 
 


$nbsp;

All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
© Copyright 1999 - 2005 Asia Times Online Ltd.
Head Office: Rm 202, Hau Fook Mansion, No. 8 Hau Fook St., Kowloon, Hong Kong
Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110