WRITE for ATol ADVERTISE MEDIA KIT GET ATol BY EMAIL ABOUT ATol CONTACT US
Asia Time Online - Daily News
             
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese



     
     Mar 30, 2007
EYE ON AMERICA
Inflation less painful than recession
By Peter Morici

For the past month, the interest rate on 10-year US Treasury bonds has dipped about a half a percentage point below the yield on a three-month Treasury note. In a solidly growing economy, investors expect to receive higher interest rates, or yields, when they tie up money for longer periods, and the inverted yield curve we now observe is causing speculation that a recession is imminent in the United States.

Don't bulk up your stock portfolio with recession-proof investments



like utilities. This time more inflation is as likely as a recession.

Historically, long rates dip before recessions because investors expect growth to slow and short-term interest rates to decline within a few months. However, over the past six years, four factors have disrupted relationships between long and short rates, and old rules may no longer apply.

First, in 2000, US stocks had become hugely overvalued thanks to the high-tech frenzy and accounting improprieties. The market bust drove investors to safer places, including long-term bonds. That bid up bond prices and lowered yields, even as a booming housing market soaked up massive amounts of long-term financing.

Second, China's and other Asian central banks have been soaking up Treasury securities to keep their currency values low against the US dollar, exports cheap, and domestic economies booming. Those purchases are not yield-sensitive, and their massive size pushes down long-term bond rates.

In June 2004, the US Federal Reserve began raising the Federal Funds Rate. Since then, by purchasing US short-term securities, the Fed has added only about US$78 billion to currency in circulation and bank reserves that back up loans. That is not much in a $13 trillion economy, and the prime rate on short-term business loans has risen from 4% to 8.25%. Meanwhile, foreign central banks have purchased more than $750 billion in US securities, and the rate on 30-year conventional mortgages is hardly changed at 6.2%.

Third, an aging population has a preference for more bonds and fixed-income securities. The oldest baby-boomers are now 62. No one should be surprised that the demand for long bonds is up and yields are down.

Fourth, in recent years, the Federal Reserve has established greater credibility as an inflation fighter, and this has caused many investors to assume long bonds are less risky than in the past.

All this is good and bad for the US economy.

The good news is that the housing market will continue to be supported by Chinese and private investor purchases of Treasury and other fixed-income securities. The housing bubble warrants a correction in land values but, as long as long bond rates stay low, the correction will be mild. Prices on existing homes won't fall a great deal. Prices may stay flat for several years but homeowners, unlike during the bust of the early 1990s, will be able to sell their properties.

The bad news is that Chinese and other foreign government intervention in currency and bond markets has dramatically reduced the effectiveness of Fed policy. Central banks in China, South Korea and other Asian countries now have as much to say about US monetary policy as the Federal Reserve.

This comes at a time when prices for key commodities such as crude oil and iron ore are determined by hyper-growth in China and elsewhere in Asia. Those forces are driving up gasoline and other material prices. This has gradually pushed up inflation for other products, too.

Also, US labor markets are tight because competition from Asian imports, advantaged by undervalued currencies, are pushing workers out of manufacturing and into services, but those workers lack skills for hard-to-fill vacancies in finance, computer services and other booming service sectors.

Consequently, getting inflation below 2%, as Fed chairman Ben Bernanke would prefer, would require draconian tightening of short-term interest rates by the Federal Reserve. That would cause a long recession and painful recovery, with real incomes falling for several years.

In the end, the Federal Reserve is as likely to leave interest rates unchanged for the balance of the year, accept more inflation, and skirt a recession.

Peter Morici is a professor at the University of Maryland School of Business and former chief economist at the US International Trade Commission.

(Copyright 2007 Peter Morici.)


Slow, but steady, as she goes (Mar 15, '07)

 
 


 

All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
© Copyright 1999 - 2007 Asia Times Online (Holdings), Ltd.
Head Office: Unit B, 16/F, Li Dong Building, No. 9 Li Yuen Street East, Central, Hong Kong
Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110