WRITE for ATol ADVERTISE MEDIA KIT GET ATol BY EMAIL ABOUT ATol CONTACT US
Asia Time Online - Daily News
             
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese



     
     Oct 2, 2007
Page 3 of 3
No such thing as a Sure Thing

By Julian Delasantellis

goes down the drain because the trader let his ego get in the way of selling out of the position. That does not come to be seen as a learning experience; it's more like an insolvency experience, a bankruptcy experience, and a threat to integrity of the financial system as a whole experience.

Over at the hunt club, and in between canapes and Pouilly fuisse with the rich and famous, the Great Trader who runs the hedge fund gets a daily marked to market profit/loss report on the firm's



trading position, and it is then, when seeing what trouble the firm actually is in, he lets out a string of colorful invectives certainly not customarily heard at these fine locales.

Great Trader doesn't give a damm about the little trader's ego; all he's interested in is keeping the firm solvent before he's summoned to the offices of the president of the New York Federal Reserve Bank like an errant schoolboy sent up to the principal's office. He finds a guy, gives him a fancy title such Audit Control Officer (ACO) or Compliance Affairs Manager (CAM); what mission this fellow is really being given is the same task given to Pontius Pilate by Tiberias - go and restore order in my provinces. In Pilate's case it was Judea, in this guy's case it's down at the trading desks.

What this ACO or CAM does is go down to the trading floor with his mighty gladius sword and just lays the place to waste. He tells the traders to sell everything, take the losses, just raise capital in order to keep the fund solvent, and "don't give me any of your sob stories".

Everything gets sold, no matter what the price. Thus, the heavy mid-August selling.

Lo and Khandani stress that it was not long/short equity-market neutral, a strategy that falls under a new class of mathematically back-tested stock investing strategies called "quantitative", or "quant", that failed, it was just that the existent market structure was insufficiently broad and deep to allow everybody that wanted to sell out of the strategy to do so simultaneously in an orderly fashion. On paper, the strategy could have worked well.

"The losses were more likely the result of a resale liquidation of quantitatively constructed portfolios rather than the specific shortcomings of quantitative methods."

This observation is true, but misleading. Investing is not a game like fantasy baseball, it is not meant to be done on paper, but with real money being invested by real, emotional human beings. Paper gains are just that, paper, and worth just about as much. You, or more likely your data-mining software, may think up a great investing strategy; maybe, if you load your program with enough data fields, you'll find that in the past it was a good idea to buy stocks whose CEOs put beer on their corn flakes, and sell stocks whose CEOs talk in a pirate brogue and walk around with parrots on their shoulders. That may work for a while, but if you can't sell out of it when you need to your paper gains are just that - paper. In the final analysis, at least in this life, it's not the paper that counts, it's what's in your wallet, what's in your bank account, what's in your house or garage, what's in your toybox.

If Lo and Khandani's analysis is right about this being the cause of August's market turmoil, to me, it just once again proves the point that greedy people are too busy and preoccupied to study history. Twenty years ago, as what would become the Crash of 1987 drew ever closer, canny investors thought that they had discovered their Sure Thing too. Back then it was hedging their individual stock positions with the then newly created stock index futures; this was called "program trading". Much like this August, this strategy collapsed when everybody tried to sell out of it at the same time; the worldwide stock market holocaust of October 19 of that year, was the result.

Former CNBC anchor Ron Insana identifies the most dangerous phrase in stock investing by the initials TTID - "This time it's different." Long/short equity market neutral is not that much different from program trading, which was not that much different from the bucket shop trading that precipitated the 1929 crash, which was not that different from the South Seas bubble of the early 18th century, which was not that different from Tulipmania in 1637 Holland, all the way back to the beginning of human history. The players and techniques do change, but mindless greed trumping reason and good judgment is always the same.

Once again, it is Charles Mackay's astounding 1841 book, Memoirs of Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds, that said it first, and still best.

"Money, again, has often been a cause of the delusion of multitudes. Sober nations have all at once become desperate gamblers, and risked almost their existence upon the turn of a piece of paper."

We're over a month past the gymnastics of August, and some semblance of order has returned to many of the markets. The Shanghai and Hong Kong stock exchanges, which weren't hurt all that much in August, are once again moving higher; US stock exchanges are back near their highs, even with the actual precipitant cause of the selloff, the subprime mortgage crisis, looking as bleak as ever. The US Fed has aggressively cut interest rates to support equities, and will probably cut again. Perhaps more importantly, a whole lot of people who had huge positions in quant strategies such as long/short equity market neutral have been blown right out of this market. Maybe we're safe for a while - until the next numskull comes up with an investing sure thing that subsequently blows up in everybody's face.

In the meantime, perhaps it's time for Lo's class to take a field trip. A couple of miles from his sparkling classrooms in Cambridge lies the local thoroughbred racing track, a tired, wheezing old place called Suffolk Downs.

I once visited this locale to do some investing, and was stunned to see what a depressed place it was. The smell of stale beer greatly overpowered that of fresh horse droppings, and the walls looked like the last paint applied to them came from World War II US Army surplus. The fixtures were rusted and dirty, as, of course, were the offerings at the snack bar.

My fellow investing clientele looked no better. They, much like the horses they were wagering on, appeared tired, wizened and wheezing - a few actually had taken their oxygen tanks with them. (The bettors, not the horses.) Their faded, torn working-class painters' or carpenters' attire was all they had to protect them from the New England cold in the unheated grandstand, and if it was near the end of the month they had to limit their betting until their next Social Security pensions check arrived.

Thirty or 40 years previously, when they first arrived at the track, they probably thought they had a Sure Thing as well.

Note
1. What Happened to the Quants in August 2007? September 20, 2007.

Julian Delasantellis is a management consultant, private investor and educator in international business in the US state of Washington. He can be reached at juliandelasantellis@yahoo.com.

(Copyright 2007 Asia Times Online Ltd. All rights reserved. Please contact us about sales, syndication and republishing.)

 1 2 3 Back

 

 

 

 
 


 

All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
© Copyright 1999 - 2007 Asia Times Online (Holdings), Ltd.
Head Office: Unit B, 16/F, Li Dong Building, No. 9 Li Yuen Street East, Central, Hong Kong
Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110