WRITE for ATol ADVERTISE MEDIA KIT GET ATol BY EMAIL ABOUT ATol CONTACT US
Asia Time Online - Daily News
             
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese



     
     Oct 17, 2007
Page 2 of 3
Vox populi: Why the Fed did a U-turn
By Julian Delasantellis

solid growth in employment and incomes and by robust economic growth abroad."

Even among the dark clouds of the subprime crisis, the Fed found the silver lining. Credit quality fears had caused a flight to safety into US Treasury securities, lowering their yield, so the long-term mortgage rates tied to Treasury rates had also declined.

"Participants also observed that mortgage loans remained readily



available to most potential borrowers, and that interest rates on conforming, conventional mortgage loans had declined in recent weeks, providing some support to the housing sector."

Stock market selling resumed immediately after the Fed’s views hit the markets, and by late in the afternoon of August 9, two days later, it was time for the great policy reversal to commence. At an emergency conference call, the Fed decided that there had been a remarkable deterioration in the economic outlook in just the 2 ½ days since the last statement.

"Financial market conditions have deteriorated, and tighter credit conditions and increased uncertainty have the potential to restrain economic growth going forward. In these circumstances, although recent data suggest that the economy has continued to expand at a moderate pace, the Federal Open Market Committee judges that the downside risks to growth have increased appreciably."

The policy actions to be implemented following the conference call would be increased "interventions" (reported at the time to be in the neighborhood of US$130 billion) in the short-term money markets, to defuse the now obvious liquidity crisis that was driving short-term interbank rates above the Fed’s 5.25% target zone. (I discussed the August 10 events in my August 14 ATol article, Central banks' easy virtue, easy money.)

But still the situation looked threatening. On August 16, the Dow Jones Industrial Average went into an early morning freefall, losing 400 points to bottom out at 12,500, making it a 1,500 point drop from the previous month's highs; it rallied into the close to finish off just 16 points for the day. The VIX option volatility/market fear index reached its highest point since the index was recalibrated in 2004.

This led to another Fed emergency conference call. At its conclusion, the Fed announced its first interest rate cut in over 4 years, a 50 point cut in the discount rate that the Fed charges its member banks for emergency borrowing (see When the big guns fail, call in China).

In marked contrast to the rosy picture of just the previous week, the Fed now reported that "Financial market conditions have deteriorated, and tighter credit conditions and increased uncertainty have the potential to restrain economic growth going forward. In these circumstances, although recent data suggest that the economy has continued to expand at a moderate pace, the Federal Open Market Committee judges that the downside risks to growth have increased appreciably. The committee is monitoring the situation and is prepared to act as needed to mitigate the adverse effects on the economy arising from the disruptions in financial markets."

August 16 marked the lows (so far) in US equity markets, but the Fed's interest rate reversal still had one more act to play. On September 18, at the its next regularly scheduled meeting, the Fed surprised the markets with 50 basis point cuts of both the discount and the Federal funds target rates, the most aggressive Fed easing move since late 2002.

According to the Fed’s statement and meeting minutes, things sure had changed since those blissful, prosperous days of early August. "Weakness in employment was spread fairly widely across industries. Residential construction and manufacturing posted noticeable declines in jobs, employment in wholesale trade and transportation was little changed, and hiring at business services was well below recent trends … trend growth in jobs had fallen off even prior to the recent financial market strains, and participants judged that some further slowing of employment growth was likely … some recent data and anecdotal information pointed to a possible nascent slowdown in the pace of expansion. Given the unusual nature of the current financial shock, participants regarded the outlook for economic activity as characterized by particularly high uncertainty, with the risks to growth skewed to the downside."

What about all that concern about inflation expressed during the August meeting? As they might say in Brooklyn, "Fuhgeddaboudit!"

The board "recognized that incoming data on core inflation continued to be favorable, and they generally were a little more confident that the decline in inflation earlier this year would be sustained. Inflation expectations seemed to be contained, and the less robust economic outlook implied somewhat less pressure on resources going forward."

The key period here is those couple of days after the August 7 meeting but before the first market interventions of August 10. What were the factors that caused the great ship Bernanke to start the process of an emergency 180 degree turn of the policy rudder?

We all can wonder and speculate as to what was happening up there at those most august levels of economic policymaking, but it was Wharton School of Finance lecturer Dr Ken Thomas who actually went out and tried to find some answers. In doing so, if they give an annual award to the cheekiest bastard in the news, Dr Thomas will certainly get my vote in 2007.

Through employment of the US government’s Freedom of Information Act, the 1966 legislation that allows American citizens relatively unrestricted access to government documents not protected by a national security or criminal justice privilege, Thomas requested and received Bernanke’s appointment and phone logs for that critical August 7-9 period.

Who had Bernanke's ear and attention during this period? Here's a hint: if your net worth was under $100 million or so, or you were

Continued 1 2 3 

 

 

 

 
 


 

All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
© Copyright 1999 - 2007 Asia Times Online (Holdings), Ltd.
Head Office: Unit B, 16/F, Li Dong Building, No. 9 Li Yuen Street East, Central, Hong Kong
Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110