WRITE for ATol ADVERTISE MEDIA KIT GET ATol BY EMAIL ABOUT ATol CONTACT US
Asia Time Online - Daily News
             
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese



     
     Dec 4, 2007
Page 1 of 5
Tight 'money'
Commentary and weekly review by Doug Noland

COMMENTARY

Between June 30, 2004, and June 29, 2006, the US Federal Reserve raised rates from 1% to 5.25%. During this period of significant Fed "tightening", "money" became progressively looser. More accurately, credit and financial conditions loosened in the face of rising short-term interest rates. Today, the Fed is in the midst of another of its aggressive loosening cycles. Credit conditions are today tight, and there is the distinct possibility that



they will remain taut or possibly tighten further.

The Fed receives too much credit for the "efficacy" of past easing cycles. Going all the way back to the then extraordinary rate slashing from the early-1990s (23 straight cuts!), it was actually the burgeoning power of Wall Street finance providing the brute force behind Fed "reliquefications" and "reflations". The evolving securitization markets and government-sponsored enterprises were the key mechanisms driving system credit expansion when the banking system was severely impaired back in 1991/92. By 1993, the blossoming leveraged speculating community had become a major force, taking highly leveraged positions in US (and Mexican!) debt securities, in the process significantly augmenting system credit availability and marketplace liquidity. By the time of the "Asian Contagion" and the Russian/Long Term Capital Management crisis, leveraged speculation throughout the (global) debt markets had become a prevailing source of system credit and liquidity creation.

Having first nurtured "Wall Street finance" to buck the banking system "headwinds" early in the '90s, by the end of the decade Fed accommodation had fashioned the most powerful "reflationary" tool in the history of central banking. Simply tinker with rates or signal lower prospective market yields and the enterprising speculators would quickly lever up on risky debt instruments on demand. Never had it been so easy for a central bank to incite "animal spirits" and stimulate credit and liquidity. The hedge funds, Wall Street firms and, increasingly over time, myriad global financial players forged the maestro’s "genius", the American economic "miracle", and synchronized global asset and economic booms. In any case, the leveraged speculating community has been the force behind US bubble economy dynamics including $800 billion current account deficits, negative savings rates, destabilizing asset bubbles, and so-called economic "resiliency".

I’ll be quite surprised if this easing cycle lives up to market expectations. Most importantly, Wall Street Finance self-destructed over the past few years. Trust will not be returning anytime soon to "structured credit products", meaning the securitization and derivatives markets are for quite some time impotent to play their usual "reflationary" role. This has been a momentous development, one certainly compounded by the role our major financial institutions came to play in structured finance and their resulting problematic credit and market exposures.

It is also worth noting that 10-year Treasury yields are today below 4%. This compares to the 6% or so when the economy headed toward recession in 2000 and the 8% or so yields when the economy succumbed to tightened credit conditions back in 1991. There is simply not much room for further "easing" of most market yields today. The Wall Street firms and the hedge funds are already dangerously distended after several years of reckless speculation. Wall Street is today in an extraordinarily poor position to expand and bolster system credit. More likely, there is today years' worth of overhang of risk securities that will eventually be liquidated by impaired leveraged players.

The unfolding credit crisis has necessitated the sequel, "Committee to Save the World, Part Two". Especially after the credit system took a turn for the worse the week before last, I can understand Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson’s urgency to have institutions renegotiate mortgage terms with troubled borrowers. But not only are we too far into the mortgage bust for such efforts to pay much in the way of dividends, I am skeptical that our securitization markets have the necessary infrastructure and legal structure to equitably adjust mortgage terms on millions of loans. And it is becoming increasingly clear that a large segment of troubled loans today involved some degree of fraud at origination. Besides, there is simply not much time to sort through all the various details. Examining the startling almost $92,000 two-month drop in Californian median home prices, it's apparent that momentum generated by the The Great Housing Bust is not to be impeded by a program to check subprime mortgage resets.

Such efforts, however, obviously have major impacts on the markets. I can’t imagine more challenging market conditions or ones more fascinating to try to analyze. It was quite a "squeeze" last week in stocks, credit instruments, currencies and commodities. The way I see it, there is today a great and destabilizing dichotomy. On the one hand, the credit crisis and severe impairment of key sectors in the credit system ensure major liquidity constraints, faltering asset markets, and an arduous economic adjustment period. On the other hand, years of egregious credit inflation have created an incredibly bloated financial apparatus (domestically and internationally) determined to disregard new realities.

This "system", importantly, is especially indisposed to succumbing to boom-turned-bust dynamics. Or, stated another way, our Wall Street dominated financial apparatus is keen on "Inflate or Die" dynamics and has no intention of relinquishing the tremendous power it has gathered over the years. This is understandable, although it certainly creates a very serious problem when it comes to the stock market refusing to adjust to rapidly deteriorating underlying fundamentals. And if market dynamics preclude an orderly stock market revaluation, expect it to come at some point violently and with great hardship. This is one aspect of the great costs associated with the Fed moving aggressively again to "reflate". It won’t work, its further subverts the market process, and only worsens an already perilous situation.

WEEK IN REVIEW

Things get only wilder ... For the week, the Dow gained 3.0% (up 7.3% y-t-d) and the S&P500 2.8% (up 4.4%). The Transports surged 4.7% (up 2.2%), and the Morgan Stanley Cyclical index rose 3.9% (up 11.1%). The Morgan Stanley Consumer index rose 2.2% (up 8.5%), and the Utilities gained 1.5% (up 15.5%). The small cap Russell 2000 increased 1.7% (down 2.5%), and the S&P400 Mid-Cap index jumped 3.1% (up 7.0). The NASDAQ100 rose 3.0%, increasing 2007 gains to 18.9%. The Morgan Stanley High Tech index advanced 1.9% (up 8.5%), and the Semiconductors added 0.3% (down 11.4%). The Street.com Internet Index rose 2.8% (up 16.2%), and the NASDAQ Telecommunications index added 0.1% (up 11.9%). The Biotechs gained 3.8% (up 9.9%). The financials rallied strongly. The Broker/Dealers jumped 4.1% (down 12.6%), and the Banks surged 5.3% (down 17.3%). With Bullion down $40, the HUI Gold index dropped 5.5% (up 20.1%).

Three-month Treasury bill rates fell an additional 8 bps this week to 3.15%. Two-year government yields dropped 8 bps to 3.0%. Five-year T-Note yields were down 2 bps to 3.39%, and ten-year yields fell 6 bps to 3.94%. Long-bond yields declined 4.5 bps to 4.38%. The 2yr/10yr spread ended the week at 94 bps. The implied yield on 3-month December ’08 Eurodollars sank 15 bps to 3.435%. Benchmark Fannie Mae MBS yields collapsed 26 bps to 5.39%, this week remarkably outperforming Treasuries. The spread on Fannie’s 5% 2017 note narrowed 14 to 60, and the spread on Freddie’s 5% 2017 note narrowed 13 to 60. The 10-year dollar swap declined 10.9 bps to 65.4. Corporate bond spreads were mixed to narrower, although the spread on an index of junk bonds ended the week 14 bps wider.

Investment grade debt issuers included GE $4.0bn, Bank of America $3.5bn, CIT Group $2.0bn, Encana $1.5bn, Virginia E&P $1.05bn, Pepsico $1.0bn, Nordstrom $1.0bn, Nucor $1.0bn, Dupont $750 million, Kellogg $750 million, Disney $750 million, Aetna $700 million, Rockwell Auto $500 million, Anheuser Busch $500 million, M&T Bank $400 million, Harris Corp $400 million, Dominion Resources $350 million, Textron $350 million, Southwestern Electric Power $300 million, New York State E&G $200 million and Georgia Power $100 million.

Junk issuers included Texas Competitive Electric Holdings $3.75bn, Constellation $500 million, and Alliance Imaging $150 million.

Foreign dollar bond issuance included Barclays $1.25bn and Marks & Spencer $800 million.

November 29 – Bloomberg (Lester Pimentel): "Emerging-market bonds fell…as soaring international bank lending rates pared demand for higher-yielding assets. The cost of borrowing euros for a month rose by a record amount and loans in dollars climbed the most in more than a decade as financial institutions grapple with losses from subprime mortgage investments."

German 10-year bund yields jumped 12 bps to 4.12%, while the DAX equities index rose 3.4% for the week (up 19.3% y-t-d). Japanese "JGB" yields gained 5.5 bps to 1.47%. The Nikkei 225 rallied 5.3%, reducing 2007 losses to 9.0%. Emerging debt and equities markets rallied sharply. Brazil’s benchmark dollar bond yields sank a notable 29 bps to 5.63%. Brazil’s Bovespa equities index jumped 3.3% (up 41.6% y-t-d). The Mexican Bolsa rallied 3.7% (up 12.6% y-t-d). Mexico’s 10-year $ yields fell 6 bps to 5.39%. Russia’s RTS equities index advanced 3.2% (up 15.5% y-t-d). India’s Sensex equities index gained 2.7% (up 40.5% y-t-d). China’s Shanghai Exchange fell 3.2%, reducing y-t-d gains to 82% and 52-week gains to 132%.

Freddie Mac posted 30-year fixed mortgage rates dropped 10 bps this week to 6.10% (down 4bps y-o-y), the low since January 2006. Fifteen-year fixed rates fell 10 bps to 5.73% (down 14bps y-o-y). One-year adjustable rates added one basis point to 5.43% (down 3bps y-o-y).

Bank Credit surged $73.1bn during the week (11/21) to a record $9.219 TN. Bank Credit has posted an 18-week gain of $575bn (19.2 annualized) and a y-t-d rise of $922bn, a 12.3% pace. For the week, Securities Credit jumped $39.9bn. Loans & Leases rose $33.2bn to $6.731 TN (18-wk gain of $406bn). C&I loans surged $21.9bn (2007 growth rate 21.8%). Real Estate loans gained $13bn. Consumer loans added $2.3bn. Securities loans declined $16.4bn, while Other loans increased $12.4bn. On the liability side, (previous M3) Large Time Deposits fell $23bn.

M2 (narrow) "money" supply rose $17.3bn to $7.420 TN (week of 11/19). Narrow "money" has expanded $377bn y-t-d, or 5.9% annualized, and $449bn, or 6.4%, over the past year. For the 

Continued 1 2 3 4 5 

 


1. China's show of strength ups military ante

2. US 'declaration' a setback for Maliki

3. If Iran's Guards strike back ...

4. Army defiant despite Pakistan's divide

5. Japan goes on an air spending spree

6. The Sharif factor comes into play
7. PATHOLOGY OF DEBT
PART 5: Off-balance-sheet debt


(Nov 30 - Dec 2, 2007)

 
 


 

All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
© Copyright 1999 - 2007 Asia Times Online (Holdings), Ltd.
Head Office: Unit B, 16/F, Li Dong Building, No. 9 Li Yuen Street East, Central, Hong Kong
Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110