WRITE for ATol ADVERTISE MEDIA KIT GET ATol BY EMAIL ABOUT ATol CONTACT US
Asia Time Online - Daily News
             
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese



     
     Dec 4, 2007
Page 1 of 2
THE BEAR'S LAIR
The cost of politicians
By Martin Hutchinson

As the United States political season moves into high gear, a full year before it will blessedly end, the thought inevitably occurs to an economy-minded person: How much do all these politicians cost? Not simply the cost of their endless and annoying campaigns, but the money diverted to economically inferior uses by political pressure, the mistakes made through their ignorance of subject matters in which they have no competence but only



political authority and the economically damaging decisions made in pursuit of non-economic and often anti-economic goals. When added up, the total is mind-boggling.

The cost of politicians must be distinguished from the cost of government itself. Anarchy doesn't work very well, and once that option is ruled out you have to have government and that government is going to cost money. Nevertheless, examples such as Britain before 1832 have demonstrated that in societies where political considerations and electoral success play only minor roles and war is avoided, government can be managed at far less cost than is now deemed necessary. One of the great ironies of the American Revolution is that the colonists, who rebelled against British-imposed taxes lower than those of the mother country, were in reality living in the lowest tax polity in the history of civilized mankind. Needless to say, once the United States had achieved independence, the taxation on its people was never as low again, even though for the country's first century and a half most US governments pursued admirably frugal policies.

In the category of money devoted to economically inferior uses, agriculture subsidies must surely hold pride of place. Initiated to protect the living standards of impoverished Dustbowl farmers and French peasant landholders, they have become entrenched as a subsidy to agribusiness and a huge blockage to freer trade. Their cost is not only the direct out of pocket expense of the US, European Union and Japanese subsidies, but the economic cost of the trade foregone by the death of the Doha Round of trade talks. As such, the annual global cost of these excrescences must be in the trillions.

A second area in which politicians divert scarce resources to economically inferior uses is that of construction. Local governments build excessively large public facilities that the market does not demand. National governments build ugly modern prestige public buildings (France) or unnecessary motorways deep in the countryside (Japan). Both local and national governments combine to subsidize ludicrously wasteful bids for major sporting events such as the Olympics or the football World Cup, or unnecessary sports stadiums such as the new baseball stadiums in Washington and New York, both subsidies to sports teams that, being in large wealthy media markets, emphatically do not need them. The Third Reich was famous for the quality of its public buildings and ceremonies; other polities are equally economically profligate, without the saving grace of Leni Riefenstahl to film the events or Albert Speer to design the buildings.

Ethanol subsidies are a combination of government devoting money to economically inferior causes and politicians meddling in matters they don't understand. Ethanol from corn, the production methodology subsidized by the George W Bush administration, is a thoroughly inferior way of producing ethanol, itself a somewhat inferior automobile fuel whose benefit to the environment is indeterminate at best. Ethanol produced from sugar cane, the Brazilian method, was itself hopelessly uneconomic for two decades after Brazil began to subsidize it in 1979, but is at least an economically and environmentally sound means of producing ethanol at the current market prices of petroleum.

Global warming is an area in which politicians don't understand the science, but give Nobel prizes and gigantic subsidies to the most alarmist scientists. Having "proved" to its own satisfaction that global warming is real, the political process is now attempting to close off debate so it can perpetrate an entire new range of controls, boondoggles and subsidies that will reward favored groups.

The irrelevance of the actual science is demonstrated by the universal politicians' preference for "cap and trade" control, which requires politicians to set emission targets based on extensive lobbying, over "carbon tax" methodology, which would require politicians to impose an unpopular tax on the electorate, thus bringing the true cost of global warming boondoggles out into the open.

The biotech sector and in particular cloning and genetic manipulation represent another area where politicians destroy economic value though their amateurism. Laughably incapable of understanding the science, they restrict advances on the basis of media scare campaigns and religious dogma. This is a potentially huge industry, the demand for which and the benefits to humanity from which are literally unimaginable; at present it seems most unlikely to grow to maturity within the United States.

Finally, politicians act without due competence in the area of finance, a sector vital to the health of an economy, yet the workings of which are governed by well understood if often counterintuitive economic laws. The Federal Reserve made insufficient allowance for bank failures after 1929 and thereby brought about a monetary collapse that greatly worsened the Great Depression.

The Securities Act of 1933, splitting commercial and investment banking, was passed in a fit of populist rage and decapitalized the investment banking sector, causing new issue volumes in the middle and late 1930s to fall far below those of the 1920-21 recession and remain at those low levels throughout the decade - again worsening and prolonging the Great Depression.

The excessive monetary creation of 1965-73, and still more that of 1995-2007, created economic problems far more intense than any short-term benefits of stock market and housing euphoria that 

Continued 1 2 


Spirals of death (Nov 28, '07)


1. China's show of strength ups military ante

2. US 'declaration' a setback for Maliki

3. If Iran's Guards strike back ...

4. Army defiant despite Pakistan's divide

5. Japan goes on an air spending spree

6. The Sharif factor comes into play
7. PATHOLOGY OF DEBT
PART 5: Off-balance-sheet debt


(Nov 30 - Dec 2, 2007)

 
 


 

All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
© Copyright 1999 - 2007 Asia Times Online (Holdings), Ltd.
Head Office: Unit B, 16/F, Li Dong Building, No. 9 Li Yuen Street East, Central, Hong Kong
Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110