WRITE for ATol ADVERTISE MEDIA KIT GET ATol BY EMAIL ABOUT ATol CONTACT US
Asia Time Online - Daily News
             
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese



     
     Mar 14, 2008
Page 2 of 5
THE SHAPE OF US POPULISM, Part 2
Long-term effects of the Civil War
By Henry C K Liu

more democratic political process. The discontent was sharpened in the South by a steady fall of cotton prices, dropping by half from 1877 to 1897.

The National Farmers' Alliance
The National Farmers' Alliance formed in Texas in 1875 was the first political organization of US populism. Known also as the Southern Alliance, it grew quickly to a membership of three million out of a total adult male working population of 18 million. A separate "Negro" organization, the Colored Farmers' Alliance, had one million members.

Concrete achievements of Southern populism were meager, mostly due to the race problem. The Bourbons managed to




control the newly emancipated "Negro" vote with the unhappy result that many white farmers viewed the disenfranchisement of the "Negro" as a necessity for breaking Bourbon domination. Southern populism was diverted in later decades by the Southern upper classes from its original progressive objective to a crusade for white supremacy.

A Northern Alliance of farmers in Kansas, Nebraska, Minnesota and the Dakotas emerged with a stable of able leaders, among whom was Mary Elizabeth Lease who called on farmers to "raise less corn and more hell". The alliances advocated measures to protect the interests of farmers and appealed to industrial workers for support. With the Southern Alliance leaders preferring to stay within the Democratic Party, the Western leaders formed the populist People's Party in May 1891 in Cincinnati, Ohio.

The People's Party
The populist platform of the People's Party demanded a series of reforms designed to break the control of political bosses and to give back to the people effective control of their government. It also aimed at restoring a more equitable economic system through nationalization of the railroads, communication networks, a graduated income tax, shorter work days and work weeks and a stable currency to ward off inflation that repeatedly outpaced wage increases.

To address the problem of farm credit, the platform proposed a "sub-treasury" plan by which the government would store non-perishable farm produce in national warehouses and give loans to farmers to whom it belonged up to but not more than 80% of it value. Populism was essentially a resurgence of the spirit of Jeffersonian agrarian democracy that had shape American ideals and institutions at the founding of the republic.

The currency issue
The issue that aroused most controversy was that of currency. Southern and Western farmers were convinced that the main reason for the fall of farm prices was the policy of deflation adopted by the Federal government after the Civil War to punish Southern debtors. By limiting the quantity of greenbacks and silver dollars, making them redeemable in gold, the Treasury had increased the value of money held by Northern money trusts and correspondingly deflated prices of commodities produced by farmers and miners.

Farmers saw the product of the labor decrease in value while their debts increased in value. They felt it unfair that they had to repay the loan they took out earlier when wheat was selling for $1 a bushel with money that could later buy wheat at 60 cents a bushel. The Populists demanded an increase in the quantity of money in the form of paper currency or unrestricted coinage of silver at the constant ratio of 16:1. The silver coin proposal received strong support from the silver miners.

The Populists were convinced that the maintenance of the gold standard was a conspiracy of international financiers, for whom the Northeastern banks were agents, to impoverish the masses. This attitude was a foundation of isolationist sentiment in the US, particularly in the rural regions of the South, the West and the Middle West.

Populism reduced to a sectional movement
The election of 1892 showed that US populism, deprived of the support of the Southern populists, was reduced to mostly a sectional movement. Democratic candidate Grover Cleveland, having lost the White House in 1888 to Republican Benjamin Harrison despite a popular vote majority but a 168 to 233 loss in electoral votes, recaptured the presidency from Harrison with both a popular vote and electoral majority. People's Party candidate James B Weaver won 1,041,028 popular votes and 22 electoral votes, all from states west of the 95th meridian, with support mostly from Western farmers and miners. Populist appeal to industrial labor was not successful.

Populism co-opted by both major parties
The long-term impact was the growth of populist influence within the two major parties. Populist candidates ran on Democratic and Republican tickets. The most notable was John P Altgeld, a German immigrant who became Democratic governor of Illinois, giving the state a progressive administration. Shortly after the 1892 election, the country plunged into a severe and long depression in which unemployment grew to over 4 million, or 18.4%, with double-digit unemployment from 1893 to 1899.

Cleveland, as the first Democrat in the White House since before the Civil War, pushed during his first term the repeal of the Bland-Allison Silver Purchase Act of 1878, which aimed at free coinage of silver, modified by Senator William B Allison to require the US Treasury to purchase between $2 million and $4 million worth of silver bullion each month at market prices to be coined into silver dollars, which were made legal tender for all debts. Always a hard-currency advocate, Cleveland believed that inflating the money supply through the purchase and coinage of silver undermined confidence in the nation's currency and punished creditors by repaying them with money less valuable than they had originally loaned. On this issue Cleveland stood apart from his populist constituency, especially in the South and West.

As with all presidents up to that time, Cleveland did not feel compelled to take any action to stimulate the slowing economy towards recovery, viewing his mandate as limited to balancing the Federal budget and preserving the gold standard.

Gold versus silver
Agitation for action on the question of silver had become intense by 1890. Farmers were straining under growing debt and falling prices. Western mining interests were anxious for a ready market for their silver and exerted pressure on Congress for bimetallism, the use of both silver and gold as a monetary standard. Western voices were much stronger with the recent addition of Idaho, Montana, Washington, Wyoming and the Dakotas to the Union. The Sherman Silver Purchase Act of 1890 was part of a broader compromise. The Democrats gave their support to the protective McKinley Tariff in return for Republican votes for silver. The Act obliged the Treasury to purchase 4.5 million ounces of silver each month at market rates, doubling the amount authorized by Bland-Allison and to issue notes redeemable in either gold or silver.

The planned government purchases amounted to almost the total monthly output from the mines. The increased supply of silver drove down the price. Many mine operators in the West tried to reduce expenses by cutting miner wages, causing labor unrest and sporadic violence in mining towns.

As the price of silver continued to decline, holders of the government notes rationally redeemed them for gold rather than silver as prescribed by Gresham's Law of bad money driving out good. The result of the growing value disparity between the two metals was the depletion of the US gold reserves and the hoarding of gold by market participants, contributing to the Panic of 1893.

The presidential election of 1896 was set in the depth of a severe depression that stimulated progressive reactions. The public was increasingly convinced that the economy had become fundamentally unsound due to a flawed structure and that government had a responsibility to protect the general welfare as it became threatened by destructive and unfair market forces. The Republicans nominated William McKinley, an Ohio native and a nationally known figure with a track record of advocating high tariffs on imports to project domestic industry as a formula for prosperity, as typified by his McKinley Tariff of 1890. McKinley was also a fervent defender of the gold standard.

Mark Hanna, the model for Karl Rove
The McKinley campaign was managed by Mark Hanna who introduced new advertising-style techniques that revolutionized political campaign practices. A century later, the Hanna campaign style would be openly admired as a model by present-day

Continued 1 2 3 4 5 

 

 

 

 
 


 

All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
© Copyright 1999 - 2008 Asia Times Online (Holdings), Ltd.
Head Office: Unit B, 16/F, Li Dong Building, No. 9 Li Yuen Street East, Central, Hong Kong
Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110