WRITE for ATol ADVERTISE MEDIA KIT GET ATol BY EMAIL ABOUT ATol CONTACT US
Asia Time Online - Daily News
             
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese



     
     May 8, 2008
The Fed's deformed maturity
By Hossein Askari and Noureddine Krichene

High prices and shortages of energy and food, resulting in riots and higher risks of widespread hunger and malnutrition, have become recognizable threats to global economic and political stability. The US dollar has collapsed to a point of triggering flight out of that currency to more stable currencies and to commodities. Inflation has become rampant.

The elementary lesson of monetary theory is that prices can never sustain a general and persistent increase, and the exchange rate can never sustain a constant depreciation, without an unduly


 

expansionary monetary policy.

Why this rampant inflation? To quote Milton Friedman: "Prices have been rising faster and faster because the [US Federal Reserve] has decreed they shall be". There is little hope for sustained global economic growth and prosperity until the Fed acknowledges that injecting billions of dollars into the economy will not add to crude oil production, currently amounting to about 80 million barrels a day and severely limited by oil reserves; nor will it increase supplies of rice, wheat, and other staple foods, limited by cultivable land and climate; and that any further reductions in interest rates with its consequent deliberate expansion in credit and money supply and dollar depreciation, will simply translate into faster increases in the prices of oil and other commodities.

Inflation will disrupt supplies and intensify speculation and hoarding. As money illusion has waned, commodity producers have become reluctant to accumulate depreciating international reserves and realize they can generate more revenues by reducing supply.

As long as commodity prices are quoted in dollars, it is the Fed that controls prices. The Fed decides how far the US dollar should fall, to two euros, three euros, or even 10 euros; how far oil prices should rise, to US$200, $500, or even $1,000 per barrel; and how much rice, corn, meat, and other staple food products should rise - two-, three-, or even 10-fold.

The United Nations and governments are baffled by world energy and food crises and are searching for supply-side solutions, but no such solution will work in an excessively unstable monetary environment. In view of their speed and magnitude, jumps in oil and food prices are purely monetary phenomena. Until monetary stability is restored, it will be difficult to identify supply constraints and solutions.

Adopting an interest rate rule repudiated as far back as 1802 by Henry Thornton and more recently passionately criticized by Milton Friedman, the Fed since 2001 has followed the most expansionary monetary policy in its history, setting interest rates at lowest levels and real interest rates at negative levels.

In response to the collapse of the credit and speculation boom, the Fed has set a deliberate re-inflationary objective in order to reverse falling asset prices. It has aggressively resumed its expansionary monetary policy since August 2007, cutting the federal funds rate from 5.25% to 2% with a consequent faster expansion of money supply, resulting in a rapidly depreciating dollar and disrupting stability in commodity markets propelling oil prices from US$65 to US$120 per barrel and food prices by 80%. The Fed is caught in a vicious cycle of credit boom, banking crisis, and re-inflation. Expansionary policy will inflate credit, expose banks to another credit crisis, then re-inflation to bail out banks and to prevent the collapse in the values of speculative assets. This cycle could go on for years.

The Fed's policy, after seven years of excessive inflationary stance, has evolved to a stage that threatens social and economic collapse and financial disorder. It has strengthened inflation dynamics causing an economic recession, which may be followed by rising unemployment.

The recession effects of inflation can be explained by a fall in real cash balances, erosion of purchasing power of fixed income and wage earners, and decline in savings and investment. By forcing nominal interest rates to abnormally low levels, the Fed is making real interest rates largely negative and in turn destroying savings needed to support investment. At the same time the Fed is making world demand for commodities continuously outpace long-term supply growth and therefore causing explosive price inflation.
Fed policy is creating widespread economic distortions. By re-inflating the economy to rescue banks and housing markets, the Fed is making the public liable for mistakes it did not make and pay for the gains reaped by speculators and debt holders. Private gains from speculative booms remain private, while the Fed passes on private losses to the public. The homeless, eating much less, are paying for bolstering the value of homeowners' asset.

Indeed, inflation is known to impose a heavy tax on cash balances and incomes in favor of debt holders be they government or private. The higher is inflation, the higher the tax burden imposed by the Fed. As inflation accelerates and the dollar depreciates, real incomes fall; consequently, vulnerable people in many countries can afford less food and the basic amenities of life.

The destabilizing effects of Fed policy have become obvious. By ignoring inflationary pressures and striving to re-inflate the economy, the Fed could precipitate a large-scale energy and food crisis, putting millions at risk. The world can address its energy and food problems only in a stable monetary framework. While the Europeans are resisting further relaxation of monetary policy, the Fed is ignoring all calls from prominent figures, including Paul Volcker, to restrain monetary policy.

Interest rate setting is a form of price control. It has to be repudiated as any other type of price control. Friedman called for controlling money aggregates and prescribed a fixed rule setting money growth in a range of 2-5% per year in line with long-term real economic growth. Such a rule is the safest for conducting stable monetary policy.

It avoids unnecessary deflationary or inflationary swings. Keynes shunned active monetary policy, even in conditions of the Great Depression when inflation risk was non-existent, because he valued monetary stability. The Fed's thinking must be that cutting interest rates will bring a bonanza from the heavens; it will make oil fields pump more oil, and rice and corn fields grow more rice! Yet there will be no relief in energy and food markets until the Fed decides to reduce money supply and credit.

Cutting the fed funds rate and a pause is the Fed's current motto after the latest interest rate cut on April 30. Pause for what? To see the dollar collapse, inflation accelerate, economy decline, and millions of people starve? Maintaining low interest rates and inflating money supply will intensify inflation, jeopardize economic growth, and worsen the energy and food situation.

The Fed's founders in 1913 wanted an institution to manage liquidity, not to control interest rates. The Fed has been made an independent institution to safeguard monetary stability. Yet this independence has allowed the Fed to deviate completely from its 1913 mandate.

If we are honest, we must acknowledge that this independence is at best symbolic. The Fed promptly responds to Wall Street's distress, be it the downturn in technology stocks, the fall of hedge funds, the collapse of the housing prices, and to political pressure for financing large fiscal deficits by keeping interest rates low.

The Fed has become totally oblivious to the global impact of inflation, the plight of millions around the world and even the mirage of economic justice. For how long will the US Congress and policymakers remain indifferent to the crumbling world monetary order and its widespread economic effects?

Hossein Askari is professor of international business and international affairs at George Washington University. Noureddine Krichene is an economist at the International Monetary Fund and a former advisor, Islamic Development Bank, Jeddah.


(Copyright 2008 Asia Times Online Ltd. All rights reserved. Please contact us about
sales, syndication and republishing
.)


The Fed's king of bubbles (Apr 26, '08)

Funding the food price fiasco
(Apr 26, '08)

Greenspan's legacy vs Volcker's demarche (Apr 24, '08)


1. Yes, the Pentagon did want to hit Iran

2. Gold price suppression scheme

3. Draining national prosperity

4. New offer threatens Iran's 'red line'

5. Speculators knock OPEC off price perch

6. China-bashing is a blind man's game

7. Just blame it on China and India

8. Myanmar faces up to cyclone disaster

9. Democrats do have a nominee

10. The twilight of irredeemable debt

(24 hours to 11:59 pm ET, May 6, 2008)

 
 


 

All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
© Copyright 1999 - 2008 Asia Times Online (Holdings), Ltd.
Head Office: Unit B, 16/F, Li Dong Building, No. 9 Li Yuen Street East, Central, Hong Kong
Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110