WRITE for ATol ADVERTISE MEDIA KIT GET ATol BY EMAIL ABOUT ATol CONTACT US
Asia Time Online - Daily News
             
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese



     
     May 20, 2008
Fed pause promises financial disaster
By Hossein Askari and Noureddine Krichene

On the heels of the most expansionary monetary policy in the post- Word War II period, pushing the US ratio of domestic credit to gross domestic product to an unsustainable 226% in 2007 as compared with 184% in 2000 and 142% 1980 respectively, the US Federal Reserve has adopted an even more aggressive expansionary policy since August, with the stated objective of re-inflating the economy to jerk up housing prices and bail out failing banks.

In the process, the Fed has pushed the dollar further down and accelerated inflation in energy and food prices, causing oil prices 

 
to race from US$70 per barrel to $126 per barrel, and food prices to levels that have resulted in malnutrition and riots.

Given that money policy works with a lengthy and variable lag, accelerating energy and food prices are the delayed effect of significant interest cuts and money expansion since August 2007. The indication is that inflationary expectations have become entrenched and strongly footed in world markets.

Most ominous is the fact that by turning real interest rates negative, the Fed has intensified speculation and put energy and food markets under accelerating and boundless rising pressure. Commodity prices have become predictable for even the non-expert; conditional on the Fed's current stance, pick up any number for oil, $150/bl, $200/bl, $250/bl, and we will be there. Similarly for rice, corn, and wheat. The Fed has made speculation more remunerative, credit riskier, and financial savings less attractive.

Basic money theory postulates that prices cannot sustain a general increase without an accommodative money and credit expansion. That is the basic quantity theory of money. Therefore, the rise of oil from $20 to $126 could not have occurred under restrained and stable monetary policy. The same goes for corn, rice, milk, and on and on - a twofold or threefold price increase cannot take place without an unduly expansionary monetary policy.

What is absurd is that the Fed does not react to abnormally high energy and food prices, that is, what is referred to as Keynes' wage goods. It reacts only to core inflation. In other words, when prices of basic food commodities, including bread and butter so necessary for children, triple or quadruple, this causes no concern to the Fed, because they are not part of core inflation. However, when toys prices go up by 10%, they may become of some concern to the Fed, signaling that core inflation is rising! But with workers struggling to put food on table, they are less concerned with buying toys. Hence, toy prices may never increase, core inflation may not rise, and the Fed may never respond to racing energy and food prices.

Alarming signs of deteriorating global food shortages and an impending world stagflation, stemming from the Fed's policy, are now pervasive. World energy and food markets have become critically fragile in the face of mounting speculation and inflationary expectations. The falling dollar and accelerating inflation will certainly depress both the global demand and supply of commodities.

As money depreciates, suppliers of commodities, already straddled with piling international reserves, will supply less as their expectations of higher prices and revenues are fully met. The evolving food crisis seems to have no precedent in modern history. While severe food shortages are developing in many vulnerable countries, media-interviewed shoppers in the US have sadly responded that they have been forced to dramatically curtail their food consumption.

Rampant energy and food prices will threaten social stability and will certainly undermine the Fed's objective of re-inflating home prices. Unless mortgage loans are showered without down payments and income checks, as was the practice during the recent housing boom, prospective home buyers will be preoccupied by simple survival and will be less willing to take on more debt. Energy and food price inflation will depress further highly overvalued home prices.

With inflationary expectations becoming strongly entrenched, the risk of global stagflation has become significant. A drawn-out inflationary process always precedes stagflation, anathema to the so-called Phillips Curve. Following the attritional effect of inflation, the economy starts to grow below its potential. It experiences a persistent output gap, rising unemployment, and increasingly entrenched inflationary expectations.

Data for the 1970s shows that the 1975-82 stagflation took place despite high interest rates, financially stable environment (domestic debt to GDP was at 138% in 1975), plentiful world food supply, and large crude oil spare capacity with plentiful supplies.

The cause of stagflation was accelerating inflation in the US and the rest of the world during 1969-74, a falling US dollar, and depressed aggregate demand in the rest of the world. Based on the data for the seventies, it could be argued that the drawn out inflation since 2003 has gained a strong enough momentum in 2008 to cause a period of more severe world stagflation than the one experienced in the 70s. The severity of stagflation will stem from very low interest rates, unsustainable credit expansion, severe limitations on oil and food supplies and abnormally high energy and food inflation. All these factors will contribute to intensifying inflation and at the same time to crippling world aggregate demand and supply.

Cut interest rates and then pause, such was the Fed's recent decision. Pause for what? For more instability? Maintaining the Federal Funds rate at 2% means that the Fed will supply any amount of liquidity required to achieve this target. This policy will depreciate money, put an end to prosperity, and disrupt world energy and food equilibrium.

Unless policymakers understand the disruptive real effects of overly expansionary monetary policy, the energy and food crisis may worsen beyond manageable limits and put at risk millions of lives. Addressing inflationary expectations is not costless. World energy and food markets can be stabilized, but only when the Fed renounces interest rates control and reins in monetary and credit expansion to a stable range. This is exactly what Paul Volcker did successfully during his tenure as Fed chairman.

Economists and the US Congress must convince the Fed to concentrate on managing liquidity, which is under its total control, and give up managing the entire economy, which is not under its control. After seven years of inflationary monetary policy, there is now more pressing need than ever for stabilization policies to address inflation and energy and food crises.

Hossein Askari is professor of international business and international affairs at George Washington University. Noureddine Krichene is an economist at the International Monetary Fund and a former advisor, Islamic Development Bank, Jeddah.

(Copyright 2008 Asia Times Online Ltd. All rights reserved. Please contact us about sales, syndication and republishing.)

Fed wins space for more cuts
May 9, 2008

Fed may want inflation
May 2, 2008

Bernanke takes one more gamble
May 2, 2008


 

 
 


 

All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
Copyright 1999 - 2008 Asia Times Online (Holdings), Ltd.
Head Office: Unit B, 16/F, Li Dong Building, No. 9 Li Yuen Street East, Central, Hong Kong
Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110