WRITE for ATol ADVERTISE MEDIA KIT GET ATol BY EMAIL ABOUT ATol CONTACT US
Asia Time Online - Daily News
             
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese



     
     Jun 27, 2008
Page 2 of 2
Bernanke's words strike false note
By Julian Delasantellis

energy and other commodity prices have increased, and some indicators of inflation expectations have risen in recent months. ... Still, uncertainty about the inflation outlook remains high. It will be necessary to continue to monitor inflation developments carefully."
The common term for when the Federal Reserve intervenes in the money markets, through purchases or sales of short term Treasury securities, is open market operations. Here, with the Fed's hands tied, unable to either raise rates to fight inflation, fearing that would push the economy further into recession, or lower rates, fearing that would stoke more commodity inflation, is the Fed�s new, perhaps final tool - what is sometimes called "open mouth operations".

As if the inflation problem was a stubborn child, the Fed now

 

apparently thinks that it can change its behavior, that it can calm the inflationary expectations reflected in rising prices for "back month" commodity futures contracts to be settled well into the next decade, by simply raising its voice, by finding words and language that convinces the markets that the Fed is serious about actually doing something inflation without actually doing something about inflation.

It didn't take long for the markets to see through the subterfuge. The US dollar rose in the initial minutes after the release of what seemed to be a strong anti-inflation statement, then pulled back sharply, falling to two week lows against the euro; foreign exchange traders realized that the statement was more a substitute for an anti-inflation policy than an actual anti-inflation policy.

US stocks also quickly realized the game being played on them; the Dow Jones Industrial Average quickly tacked on 70 points in the immediate aftermath of the statement, only to lose all of the rally and more, closing up a mere four points on the day. A recent newsletter to clients of the Royal Bank of Scotland warned of the inflation threat possibly causing a 25% crash in world equity markets by September; on the bright side, such an event would probably at last divert the American electronic media's now traditional manic obsession with summer shark attacks.

From Bernanke's viewpoint, one positive effect the Fed's non-decision decision had must have been to depopulate the Texas insurgency now being led by Dallas Federal Reserve Bank president Richard Fisher against what he sees as Bernanke's inadequate vigilance against inflation.

In front of every microphone he can find outside a karaoke bar, Fisher has recently been raising the alarm against the inflation threat. At the April meeting, Fisher, along with Philadelphia Fed president Charles Plosser, dissented from Bernanke's rate-cutting majority; they wanted a rate hike along with much stronger anti-inflation language. Fisher, still wanting a rate hike, once again dissented from the current decision, but apparently the stronger anti-inflation language coaxed Plosser back to Bernanke - he voted with the majority.

At the end of the day, what all this represents is yet another Bernanke gamble, a frantic attempt to buy some time until the circumstance arises where inflation and unemployment do not have to be fought simultaneously. The hope here is that, by the time of the next Fed meeting on August 6, either inflation will have abated, allowing an attack on the recession with another rate cut, or a strengthening economy will make a rate hike more palatable. If, however, both unemployment and inflation continue to rise in unison, the gamble will be lost, for that will mean that stagflation has been given a further six weeks to implant its toxic roots ever deeper into the economy.

Whatever happens next, it is probably fair to assume that this is a trick that Bernanke can't get away with much more, if at all. If inflation continues to be seen as a threat, then simply employing ever harsher and harsher language eventually won�t work. Sooner or later, and if the post-meeting reaction by the markets is any indication, it�s probably sooner, the markets are going to call Bernanke's bluff.

If inflation is still seen as a problem in August, and if then Bernanke is seen as a dithering, indecisive Hamlet ("to raise or not to raise - that is the question") expect a truly awesome forthcoming fall in the US dollar - along with a burgeoning of the Fisher-led insurgency that might well threaten the continued tenure of Bernanke as Fed chairman.

Of course, the process of reconciling the current American economic difficulties will be easier once American economic policymakers, Bernanke included, finally realize that the nation�s economic destiny is no longer wholly determined by personages and events within its borders.

As I stated last week, the current inflation in the United States, as well as in most of the Western industrialized democracies, cannot be addressed solely domestically, for its origin is not at home but in the commodity demand of such newly industrializing nations such as Brazil, India, and, especially, China.

Should the US raise domestic interest rates while ignoring the real engine churning price hikes from out of these nations, the most likely practical effect would be not an amelioration of inflation but a deepening of the domestic fiscal and credit crisis. Mohamed El-Erian, the former superstar manager of the Harvard University endowment fund now advising the Pimco bond brokerage, recently said that he does not consider even Goldman Sachs, American finance capitalism's golden goddess, to be immune from possible damage arising out of the credit crisis. If you have a virus so potent that it fells even the ubermensch, you can imagine what it will do to the population as a whole.

"You think", the Bee Gees sang, "that I don't even mean a single word I say?" Precisely. The markets don't think that Bernanke means a single word he says.

Besides having "words", back then the Bee Gees were devastatingly handsome; undoubtedly, that assisted in, as the song said, taking the girls they fancied hearts away. Bernanke's not that good looking; next time, he'll need to come through with actual actions.

Julian Delasantellis is a management consultant, private investor and educator in international business in the US state of Washington. He can be reached at juliandelasantellis@yahoo.com.


(Copyright 2008 Asia Times Online (Holdings) Ltd. All rights reserved. Please contact us about sales, syndication and republishing.)

1 2 Back

 

 

 

 
 


 

All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
© Copyright 1999 - 2008 Asia Times Online (Holdings), Ltd.
Head Office: Unit B, 16/F, Li Dong Building, No. 9 Li Yuen Street East, Central, Hong Kong
Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110