WRITE for ATol ADVERTISE MEDIA KIT GET ATol BY EMAIL ABOUT ATol CONTACT US
Asia Time Online - Daily News
             
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese



     
     Nov 6, 2008
Page 2 of 2
Economics can open to new realities
By Joe Costello

evolving our political economy. In fact, the fundamental principles of republicanism and democracy share the biological necessities of distributed order and robust feedback loops that create stability. Reinvigorating the principles and practices foundational to the American republic will help move forward the evolution of self-government for the 21st century.

Two pillars of the American system are "separation of powers" and "checks and balances," both based on the idea of distributed power. Of course the elemental component of self-government is the engaged, educated, and active citizen, not centrally controlled but an independent active agent endowed with rights. The fundamental rights of free speech, a free press, freedom to petition and assemble are all viable and important elements to a

 

republican/democratic political feedback loop. Thus we can begin an American reformation by reviving these principles and restoring them to their rightful places in the foundation of our self-government.

It is also clear, more must be done than a simple restoration, we must also evolve our political economy. We can look at three different essential elements of 21st century political economy and see how creating networked distributed order with effective feedback loops will help create the change we are in so desperate need. The three are; energy, government and corporations.

There is no change more necessary for the United States than moving past its 19th and 20th century dependence on fossil fuels. The rise in the price of oil to almost US$150 a barrel severely impacted the American economy, while the continued spewing of fossil fuel emissions into the global environment wreaks greater and greater destruction on the planets biological systems.

America must rebuild its energy infrastructure from the ground up, a this task that will overwhelmingly be worked at the local level, with solutions designed to fit the local environment. America's energy infrastructure must be retooled from the ground-up and this starts with demand destruction.

The essential questions we must ask ourselves is how do we as individuals, communities, businesses, and government cut the amount of energy we use. As individuals, we must break our auto-centric habits and begin car-pooling, walking, biking and using transit. We must redesign our communities so they are more walkable, bike-able, and friendly to public transit. These are activities that all must be undertaken at the individual and local levels.

Secondly, we must replace fossil fuels with other energy sources. Solar for one will be more useful in distributed as opposed to traditional central generation systems. Our electric system must be completely overhauled and made intelligent, allowing a more efficient use of renewable fuels, distributed as opposed to centralized generation, and intelligence in the system that allows more efficient use of energy in our homes, offices, and public places. Our centralized, information bare, limited feedback electric grid must be transformed into another Internet - a distributed, intelligent, feedback filled robust network.

In changing the American energy infrastructure we will fundamentally change America's industrial infrastructure, and this is not simply a technological process, it is also a tremendously political one. The Financial Times reports:
"A report by the American Society of Civil Engineers concludes that America's infrastructure overall is close to 'failing' and deserves a grade of 'D'. It estimates that an investment of $1.6 trillion will be needed to bring it up to working order. According to the report, nearly 30% of the nation's 590,750 bridges are 'structurally deficient or functionally obsolete' and it will take '$9.4 billion a year for 20 years to eliminate all bridge deficiencies'."

This would be just for maintaining the existing infrastructure, but what we must do is not maintain, but transform the existing infrastructure. America's present infrastructure is not simply technologically entrenched, but just as importantly or maybe more importantly, it is politically entrenched. This technological infrastructure has people, corporations, and governments all with an invested interest in preserving the status quo, and they will work hard to do so.

Transferrence, not "creation"
Even more importantly, much of the transformation of American infrastructure will not be wealth-creating in our traditional industrial economy accounting. Traditionally, wealth is created by transforming raw natural resource into products. However, in the necessary transformation of American infrastructure, we will need in many cases to recycle and transform existing infrastructure. Wealth will not be created so much as transferred, for example, by taking 20 commuters out of their cars and placing them on buses or trains.

Next, we must reform the centralized industrial corporation. The centralization of economic and political power from industrialization has been tremendous. The rise of the industrial corporation from its beginning was seen as threat to the distributed power of the republic. Stopping the growth of corporate power was met with limited, though really no success in American history. We must begin a corporate reformation based on distributed power. We can look for guidance to the wisdom of the turn of the 19th and 20th century anti-trust movement, particularly to Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis who stated:
Both liberty and democracy are seriously threatened by the growth of big business. Today the need is not so much for freedom from physical restraint as for freedom from economic oppression. Already the displacement of the small independent businessman by the huge corporation with its myriad of employees, its absentee ownership, and its financier control, presents a grave danger to our democracy. The social loss is great; and there is no economic gain. Political liberty, then, is not enough; it must be attended by economic and industrial liberty.
Brandeis was of course bringing to the 20th century Thomas Jefferson's universal understanding that democracy was inherently decentralized. Jefferson understood the self-sufficient yeoman farmer was an essential element to 18th century American self-government. However, the agrarian/merchant republic Jefferson helped found was born simultaneously with the industrial era, and the two have had a fitful coexistence.

Over time, many of the practices and principles of industrialization crushed their democratic counterparts. Most notably, the industrial ideas of "economies of scale" and "consolidation" destroyed small economic associations and decentralized power, squashing democracy across the spectrum of our society from production, to finance, to communication.

Today, the American economy is more centralized than at any time in our history, thus it is also the least democratic. The concepts and practices of "economies of scale" and "consolidation" can only be looked at as unambiguously beneficial when one takes the political out of the economy. However, if you looked at economics and politics as intricately entwined, made perfectly clear to even the most near-sighted by our present financial crisis and the swinging wide of our Treasury vaults for Wall Street, "economies of scale" and "consolidation" are undemocratic.

Media consolidation has been destructive for the necessary feedback loops of any healthy democratic system. It has placed the majority of news, and thus political information, the life's blood of any system of self-government, into the control of an ever increasingly small number. Such a concentration is historically anathema to any democratic system. With our growing understanding of biological systems and complexity, this centralization creates instability, as seen in the current financial crisis. It is a tremendously insufficient architecture for vital and necessary feedback.

We must not only open more channels and distribute power in communications, but we must reform control of information itself. Open standards must be built into all our technological and information processes. Our patent and copyright laws are in desperate need of reform. They have been mutilated beyond both recognition and the public good. Once again, one of the principles of the republic's founding, a free and open press, that is the unencumbered distribution of information necessary for self-government, must be revived, strengthened, and evolved in all aspects of our political economy.

With any reform of self-government, corporate reform must go hand in hand. We can start with Jefferson's simple principle of the necessity of decentralization, brought forward by Brandeis, combined with our new knowledge of complexity and feedback. "Break Them Up" can be the foundational rallying cry for all corporate reform - "Too big to fail" must become "Too big to exist."

Government away from the center
Finally, we must reform our government structures. America must begin distributing power out of Washington DC. The wildest Federalist's dream could never have imagined the concentration of power in today's Washington DC. Inside DC, we watch an executive branch descending into ever greater power grabs and increasingly attempting to place itself beyond the rule of law. Historically, no republic ever collapses into chaos, it is overthrown by a strongman with the compliant apathy of an effete disenfranchised citizenry.

The United States government must begin to evolve from a hierarchical representative architecture to a more distributed network, directly democratic system. Fortunately for the United States, this system is already in place. The United States from its founding was in many ways a distributed system. The checks and balances and separation of powers weren't simply inside the Federal government between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches, but also between federal, state, local governments, and finally and most importantly the citizen.

The local and county governments of America exist and are functional, but they have become increasingly powerless. Reforming America self-government means bringing power to these institutions, then evolving them by connecting them through a distributed network architecture.

There's no reason for local governments to go to state capitals or DC to work amongst themselves, or plead for resources taken from them. They are the established nodes of what can become a very robust distributed network. What needs to be created are the connections. With these connections, local governments can pass information, work together on economic development, transform our energy infrastructure, and more effectively manage local and regional environments.

Bringing power to local governments will also help make government power more accessible to the citizen. The elemental force underneath all healthy system's of self-government are the citizens themselves. The last half of the 20th century has seen an almost complete disenfranchisement of the citizenry from both politics and government. The centralization of political economy has been at expense of the citizen.

Any reform must create greater roles for the citizenry in both politics and government. America's citizenry is going to have reengage in a restored and evolved democratic politics and republican government.

Of course, there is a giant paradox in this idea of the renewal of the local, which is, it must be accomplished in many ways with Washington DC actively removing power from itself and empowering city and county governments. Such voluntary abdication of power has limited historical precedent, the most recent having been Mikhail Gorbachev's Moscow. Nonetheless, if America is to restore its republic, we will need to see the equivalent of an anti-president and anti-congress. This will not come about without plenty of pressure from the bottom.

So, if we look at our present financial crisis, as simply or even predominately as a financial problem, we are missing the greater underlying forces. Yet to this date, we see an inability to confront any of these issues. Instead, we see a literally mad attempt to protect our habituated status quo.

Instead of facing up to our now decades-long drift into delusion that debt is wealth, every dollar we now spend assures an even deeper hole from which we will have to climb. Just as the Allies sought in the name of peace at the conclusion of World War I to cripple Germany, thus creating future war, our political and economic leadership in the name of financial well being, cripples the future, fating us to insolvency.

New concepts, new foundations
The challenge America faces is substantial. Our political economy is built on a sandy and false foundation reaching back not simply a half century, but over a century and half. The notion of unlimited production and unlimited consumption based on infinite resources, the foundation of industrial economics, crumbles as the oil fields upon which it rests decline.

With this crumbling comes the collapse of many of the concepts and principles of the industrial era, leading to increasing societal volatility.

We must reach into history for roots that are much deeper than industrial society to help provide stability, and combine it with our present knowledge of natural systems to help foster future healthy growth.

At its simplest and sublimest, civilization can be defined as humanity's ability to incorporate the past and plan for the future. This isn't something that can be measured on a quarterly basis; in fact, any society that tries to measure success on such a time frame can rightly be considered uncivilized. The changes laid out here will take years and generations.

Once again I'll turn to Mr Keynes, one of the finest minds of the 20th century, and borrow his conclusion
The true voice of the new generation has not yet spoken, and silent opinion is not yet formed. To the formation of the general opinion of the future I dedicate this [essay].
Joe Costello is a communication and energy consultant. He served as communications director for Jerry Brown's 1992 presidential campaign and senior advisor on Howard Dean's 2004 campaign.

(Copyright 2008 Joe Costello)

1 2 Back

 

 

 
 


 

All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
© Copyright 1999 - 2008 Asia Times Online (Holdings), Ltd.
Head Office: Unit B, 16/F, Li Dong Building, No. 9 Li Yuen Street East, Central, Hong Kong
Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110