|
|
|
 |
Page 1 of 5
THE FOLLY OF INTERVENTION, Part 2
No easy exit for nationalization
By Henry C K Liu
Part 1:
The zero interest rate trap
The notion that nationalization is only an emergency measure that can be undone
as soon as the economy recovers appears to be wishful thinking. Discussing the
US Federal Reserve's market exit strategy problem, Fed chairman Ben Bernanke
said in his London School of Economics Stamp Lecture: "The Crisis and the
Policy Response": Some observers have expressed the concern that, by
expanding its balance sheet, the Federal Reserve is effectively printing money,
an action that will ultimately be inflationary. The Fed's lending activities
have indeed resulted in a large increase in
the excess reserves held by banks. Bank reserves, together
with currency, make up the narrowest definition of money, the monetary base; as
you would expect, this measure of money has risen significantly as the Fed's
balance sheet has expanded. However, banks are choosing to leave the great bulk
of their excess reserves idle, in most cases on deposit with the Fed.
Consequently, the rates of growth of broader monetary aggregates, such as M1
and M2, have been much lower than that of the monetary base. At this point,
with global economic activity weak and commodity prices at low levels, we see
little risk of inflation in the near term; indeed, we expect inflation to
continue to moderate. In other words, the Fed's bank
nationalization measures had not helped the economy as banks had chosen not to
obey the government's intention to increase lending. These measures had very
little, if any, effect on deflation, which exacerbates the need of banks for
recapitalization.
Bernanke went on: However, at some point, when credit markets and the
economy have begun to recover, the Federal Reserve will have to unwind its
various lending programs. To some extent, this unwinding will happen
automatically, as improvements in credit markets should reduce the need to use
Fed facilities. Indeed, where possible we have tried to set lending rates and
margins at levels that are likely to be increasingly unattractive to borrowers
as financial conditions normalize. In addition, some programs - those
authorized under the Federal Reserve's so-called 13(3) authority, which
requires a finding that conditions in financial markets are "unusual and
exigent" - will by law have to be eliminated once credit market conditions
substantially normalize. However, as the unwinding of the Fed's various
programs effectively constitutes a tightening of policy, the principal factor
determining the timing and pace of that process will be the [Federal Open
Market Committee's] assessment of the condition of credit markets and the
prospects for the economy. In other words, de-nationalization
will prolong the recession. Since nationalization of the financial sector had
been necessary to save the financial system from imploding, it was not a
Keynesian move to stimulate economic recovery, all the misleading euphemism
notwithstanding. What the Fed did was to keep the critically ill patient alive
with extraordinary measures, even if the cost is a drawn-out long-term recovery
that requires hospitalization for the rest of the patient's life. Small
government cannot be restored by big government, even temporarily. Also, near
zero interest rates can hardly be described as "unattractive" to borrowers.
Bernanke went on to explain: As lending programs are scaled back, the
size of the Federal Reserve's balance sheet will decline, implying a reduction
in excess reserves and the monetary base. A significant shrinking of the
balance sheet can be accomplished relatively quickly, as a substantial portion
of the assets that the Federal Reserve holds - including loans to financial
institutions, currency swaps, and purchases of commercial paper - are
short-term in nature and can simply be allowed to run off as the various
programs and facilities are scaled back or shut down. As the size of the
balance sheet and the quantity of excess reserves in the system decline, the
Federal Reserve will be able to return to its traditional means of making
monetary policy - namely, by setting a target for the federal funds rate.
Although a large portion of Federal Reserve assets are short-term in nature, we
do hold or expect to hold significant quantities of longer-term assets, such as
the mortgage-backed securities that we will buy over the next two quarters.
Although longer-term securities can also be sold, of course, we would not
anticipate disposing of more than a small portion of these assets in the near
term, which will slow the rate at which our balance sheet can shrink. We are
monitoring the maturity composition of our balance sheet closely and do not
expect a significant problem in reducing our balance sheet to the extent
necessary at the appropriate time.
Importantly, the management of the Federal Reserve's balance sheet and the
conduct of monetary policy in the future will be made easier by the recent
congressional action to give the Fed the authority to pay interest on bank
reserves. In principle, the interest rate the Fed pays on bank reserves should
set a floor on the overnight interest rate, as banks should be unwilling to
lend reserves at a rate lower than they can receive from the Fed. In practice,
the federal funds rate has fallen somewhat below the interest rate on reserves
in recent months, reflecting the very high volume of excess reserves, the
inexperience of banks with the new regime, and other factors.
However, as excess reserves decline, financial conditions normalize, and banks
adapt to the new regime, we expect the interest rate paid on reserves to become
an effective instrument for controlling the federal funds rate.
Moreover, other tools are available or can be developed to improve control of
the federal funds rate during the exit stage. For example, the Treasury could
resume its recent practice of issuing supplementary financing bills and placing
the funds with the Federal Reserve; the issuance of these bills effectively
drains reserves from the banking system, improving monetary control.
Longer-term assets can be financed through repurchase agreements and other
methods, which also drain reserves from the system.
In considering whether to create or expand its programs, the Federal Reserve
will carefully weigh the implications for the exit strategy. And we will take
all necessary actions to ensure that the unwinding of our programs is
accomplished smoothly and in a timely way, consistent with meeting our
obligation to foster full employment and price stability. The
size of the Fed's balance sheet cannot shrink unless the fed funds rate target
remains near zero and the fed funds rate target cannot rise above near zero
until the Fed balance sheet shrinks. Instead of price stability, the Fed's
actions has created a stability of near zero interest rate and an expanded Fed
balance sheet. The Fed balance sheet cannot shrink and the zero interest rate
also cannot rise in the foreseeable future. The repurchase market, where the
Fed Open Market Committee conducts its trading to keep the fed funds rate on
target, has been essentially halted by zero interest rates.
Rescuing one market at a time
There are talks that some in government are thinking of rescuing one market at
a time, such as the commercial paper market, by creating a new bank along the
line of Alexander Hamilton's First Bank of the United States to buy up all
toxic assets, instead of "ring fencing" toxic asset one bank at a time. The
objective is not to reduce the need for further write down, but to find out
once and for all how deep the loss will turn out to be to stop the continuing
loss of confidence. Until confidence is restored, private capital will not
return to the market.
The systemic lesson of the Lehman bankruptcy
Since March 2008, the Fed internally had in its possession the latest updated
market information. The picture had been increasingly ominous, revealing the
effects a possible Lehman Brothers' collapse would have on the precarious
systemic interconnections and cross-exposure to risk among investment banks,
hedge funds and traders in the vast market for credit-default swaps and other
derivative positions.
But in the end, both potential private sector white knights to rescue Lehman
and the Fed's offer of aid effectively blinked
Continued 1
2 3 4 5
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
All material on this
website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written
permission.
© Copyright 1999 - 2009 Asia Times
Online (Holdings), Ltd.
|
|
Head
Office: Unit B, 16/F, Li Dong Building, No. 9 Li Yuen Street East,
Central, Hong Kong
Thailand Bureau:
11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110
|
|
|
|