WRITE for ATol ADVERTISE MEDIA KIT GET ATol BY EMAIL ABOUT ATol CONTACT US
Asia Time Online - Daily News
             
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese



     
     Jan 23, 2009
Page 1 of 5
THE FOLLY OF INTERVENTION, Part 2
No easy exit for nationalization
By Henry C K Liu

Part 1: The zero interest rate trap

The notion that nationalization is only an emergency measure that can be undone as soon as the economy recovers appears to be wishful thinking. Discussing the US Federal Reserve's market exit strategy problem, Fed chairman Ben Bernanke said in his London School of Economics Stamp Lecture: "The Crisis and the Policy Response":
Some observers have expressed the concern that, by expanding its balance sheet, the Federal Reserve is effectively printing money, an action that will ultimately be inflationary. The Fed's lending activities have indeed resulted in a large increase in


the excess reserves held by banks. Bank reserves, together with currency, make up the narrowest definition of money, the monetary base; as you would expect, this measure of money has risen significantly as the Fed's balance sheet has expanded. However, banks are choosing to leave the great bulk of their excess reserves idle, in most cases on deposit with the Fed. Consequently, the rates of growth of broader monetary aggregates, such as M1 and M2, have been much lower than that of the monetary base. At this point, with global economic activity weak and commodity prices at low levels, we see little risk of inflation in the near term; indeed, we expect inflation to continue to moderate.
In other words, the Fed's bank nationalization measures had not helped the economy as banks had chosen not to obey the government's intention to increase lending. These measures had very little, if any, effect on deflation, which exacerbates the need of banks for recapitalization.

Bernanke went on:
However, at some point, when credit markets and the economy have begun to recover, the Federal Reserve will have to unwind its various lending programs. To some extent, this unwinding will happen automatically, as improvements in credit markets should reduce the need to use Fed facilities. Indeed, where possible we have tried to set lending rates and margins at levels that are likely to be increasingly unattractive to borrowers as financial conditions normalize. In addition, some programs - those authorized under the Federal Reserve's so-called 13(3) authority, which requires a finding that conditions in financial markets are "unusual and exigent" - will by law have to be eliminated once credit market conditions substantially normalize. However, as the unwinding of the Fed's various programs effectively constitutes a tightening of policy, the principal factor determining the timing and pace of that process will be the [Federal Open Market Committee's] assessment of the condition of credit markets and the prospects for the economy.
In other words, de-nationalization will prolong the recession. Since nationalization of the financial sector had been necessary to save the financial system from imploding, it was not a Keynesian move to stimulate economic recovery, all the misleading euphemism notwithstanding. What the Fed did was to keep the critically ill patient alive with extraordinary measures, even if the cost is a drawn-out long-term recovery that requires hospitalization for the rest of the patient's life. Small government cannot be restored by big government, even temporarily. Also, near zero interest rates can hardly be described as "unattractive" to borrowers.

Bernanke went on to explain:
As lending programs are scaled back, the size of the Federal Reserve's balance sheet will decline, implying a reduction in excess reserves and the monetary base. A significant shrinking of the balance sheet can be accomplished relatively quickly, as a substantial portion of the assets that the Federal Reserve holds - including loans to financial institutions, currency swaps, and purchases of commercial paper - are short-term in nature and can simply be allowed to run off as the various programs and facilities are scaled back or shut down. As the size of the balance sheet and the quantity of excess reserves in the system decline, the Federal Reserve will be able to return to its traditional means of making monetary policy - namely, by setting a target for the federal funds rate.
Although a large portion of Federal Reserve assets are short-term in nature, we do hold or expect to hold significant quantities of longer-term assets, such as the mortgage-backed securities that we will buy over the next two quarters. Although longer-term securities can also be sold, of course, we would not anticipate disposing of more than a small portion of these assets in the near term, which will slow the rate at which our balance sheet can shrink. We are monitoring the maturity composition of our balance sheet closely and do not expect a significant problem in reducing our balance sheet to the extent necessary at the appropriate time.

Importantly, the management of the Federal Reserve's balance sheet and the conduct of monetary policy in the future will be made easier by the recent congressional action to give the Fed the authority to pay interest on bank reserves. In principle, the interest rate the Fed pays on bank reserves should set a floor on the overnight interest rate, as banks should be unwilling to lend reserves at a rate lower than they can receive from the Fed. In practice, the federal funds rate has fallen somewhat below the interest rate on reserves in recent months, reflecting the very high volume of excess reserves, the inexperience of banks with the new regime, and other factors.

However, as excess reserves decline, financial conditions normalize, and banks adapt to the new regime, we expect the interest rate paid on reserves to become an effective instrument for controlling the federal funds rate.

Moreover, other tools are available or can be developed to improve control of the federal funds rate during the exit stage. For example, the Treasury could resume its recent practice of issuing supplementary financing bills and placing the funds with the Federal Reserve; the issuance of these bills effectively drains reserves from the banking system, improving monetary control. Longer-term assets can be financed through repurchase agreements and other methods, which also drain reserves from the system.

In considering whether to create or expand its programs, the Federal Reserve will carefully weigh the implications for the exit strategy. And we will take all necessary actions to ensure that the unwinding of our programs is accomplished smoothly and in a timely way, consistent with meeting our obligation to foster full employment and price stability.
The size of the Fed's balance sheet cannot shrink unless the fed funds rate target remains near zero and the fed funds rate target cannot rise above near zero until the Fed balance sheet shrinks. Instead of price stability, the Fed's actions has created a stability of near zero interest rate and an expanded Fed balance sheet. The Fed balance sheet cannot shrink and the zero interest rate also cannot rise in the foreseeable future. The repurchase market, where the Fed Open Market Committee conducts its trading to keep the fed funds rate on target, has been essentially halted by zero interest rates.

Rescuing one market at a time
There are talks that some in government are thinking of rescuing one market at a time, such as the commercial paper market, by creating a new bank along the line of Alexander Hamilton's First Bank of the United States to buy up all toxic assets, instead of "ring fencing" toxic asset one bank at a time. The objective is not to reduce the need for further write down, but to find out once and for all how deep the loss will turn out to be to stop the continuing loss of confidence. Until confidence is restored, private capital will not return to the market.

The systemic lesson of the Lehman bankruptcy
Since March 2008, the Fed internally had in its possession the latest updated market information. The picture had been increasingly ominous, revealing the effects a possible Lehman Brothers' collapse would have on the precarious systemic interconnections and cross-exposure to risk among investment banks, hedge funds and traders in the vast market for credit-default swaps and other derivative positions.

But in the end, both potential private sector white knights to rescue Lehman and the Fed's offer of aid effectively blinked 

Continued 1 2 3 4 5 


The Complete Henry C K Liu

Towards an inflationary twilight zone (Jan 8,'09)

US rate cuts: Like a blow to the head
(Sep 20,'07)


1. Pakistan's shift alarms the US

2. President Oxybarama

3. Indian army 'backed out' of Pakistan attack

4. Where is the safe haven?

5. A world of financial freeloaders

6. Obama and the other ceasefire

7. China's military awaits new satellites

8. Absolute power gets
blamed absolutely


9. Zero interest rate trap

10. Liberals, realists set to clash

11. The fleecing of America

(24 hours to 11:59pm ET, Jan 21, 2009)

 
 


 

All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
© Copyright 1999 - 2009 Asia Times Online (Holdings), Ltd.
Head Office: Unit B, 16/F, Li Dong Building, No. 9 Li Yuen Street East, Central, Hong Kong
Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110