WRITE for ATol ADVERTISE MEDIA KIT GET ATol BY EMAIL ABOUT ATol CONTACT US
Asia Time Online - Daily News
             
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese



     
     Aug 18, 2009
Page 1 of 3
CREDIT BUBBLE BULLETIN
Hard facts ignored
Commentary and weekly watch by Doug Noland

Stock prices traditionally lead economic recoveries. Securities markets tend to react swiftly to loosened monetary conditions, while it takes some time for loose credit to work its way through to the bowels of the real economy. Highly speculative markets react haphazardly, sloshing liquidity out and about.

As is commonly understood, employment conditions are a somewhat lagging economic indicator. Most analysts have been content to read nothing of significance from ongoing poor jobs and housing data. Overwhelmingly, the bulls rely on faith - and history - that surging stock prices are discounting the usual "V" rebound.

Data this week should have those of the bullish persuasion on

 

edge. July retail sales were much weaker-than-expected (down 0.1% against expectations of a rise of 0.8%). Retail sales excluding auto sales were down 0.6% for the month (down 8.1% year on year), the largest drop since March's 1.1% fall. Looking back, there was no mystery surrounding first-quarter consumer weakness. But even after a dramatic stock market recovery, July's Department store sales were down a dismal 1.6% for the month (down 9.6% y-o-y). Even Wal-Mart management commented that their customers were "selective" and remained keenly focused on value.

Last week's preliminary report on August University of Michigan Consumer Confidence was also a big disappointment. The consensus called for this confidence reading to jump three points to 69. The actual report came in down to 63 - the lowest level since those dark days of March. Readings on both "Economic Conditions" and "Economic Outlook" dropped to five-month lows.

RealtyTrac reported that US foreclosures jumped to a record 360,149 in July. This was up almost 7% from June and 32% higher than the year ago level. And there's no relief in sight. American Bankruptcy Institute data had 126,000 Americans filing for bankruptcy in July, up 34% from a year earlier. It is now expected that 1.4 million will file for bankruptcy this year.

Meanwhile, the economic optimists took comfort from the week's readings on non-farm productivity, wholesale inventories, industrial production, and capacity utilization. Positive data out of Europe and Asia also seemed to confirm that some type of global economic recovery has taken hold.

From my perspective, the week's data confirm important aspects of credit bubble analysis. First, ongoing headwinds will restrain rebounds in US housing markets and household consumption - for an extended period. Second, the overall US consumption-based economy will lag those of most of our more manufacturing-oriented trading partners. In short, we are witnessing anything but typical reflation dynamics, and those expecting a typical US recovery will be disappointed. Our economy remains overly exposed to US consumption, while having insufficient manufacturing capacity (and resources) of the type to benefit significantly from heightened global demand.

Returning to the stock market, I see nothing typical going on there either. With the Morgan Stanley Retail Index and the Morgan Stanley Cyclical Index up 56% and 49%, respectively, the marketplace apparently has no issue with the recovery. I suspect these gains have been inflated by short covering. Indeed, market dynamics likely explain much of the divergence between ongoing weak underlying economic fundamentals and robust stock prices (especially in the consumer arena).

Unusually large bearish hedges and bets had been placed against the (consumer-driven) US economy. Unprecedented fiscal and monetary policy crisis response stabilized the credit system, setting in motion a self-reinforcing unwind of "bearish" positions. In the past, such a reflationary dynamic would have seen stock prices for the most part accurately discount the future direction of economic activity.

Stated differently, the reversal of bearish positions (and resulting short "squeeze") would traditionally have (reflating) stock prices portending recovery and a return to the previous trajectory of economic performance. In general, a rejuvenated credit system - and the resulting recovery of financial flows - would ensure that the "bear" case was proved wrong.

This time may be different. I would not be surprised if the confluence of unusually large bearish positions, unprecedented policy response, and a resulting major "squeeze" created a backdrop where the stock market was turned into a rather poor foreteller of future prospects. From my vantage point, I certainly don't believe stock prices today generally provide an accurate reflection of underlying company fundamentals. And from an economic perspective, I suspect the stock market is missing some key underlying dynamics that will shape future economic performance.

In particular, equities seem to be discounting a return to business as usual when it comes to the US economy. Retail and the "consumer discretionary" sectors have been among this year's stellar performers. And, yes, this does fly in the face of my analysis of new economic realities and a permanently downsized role for household consumption in the US economy.

At this point, I view this as an anomaly at least partially explained by the hastened reversal of bearish positions. But I also recognize that massive fiscal and monetary stimuluses have been implemented with the policy goal of sustaining the existing economic structure. The market has been content to play this dynamic, expecting policymaker success.

As I attempted to explain last week, I view the impairment of the stock market discounting mechanism as a key facet of monetary disorder. The reversal of bearish plays not only created huge buying power throughout the markets, it decisively reversed "the greed and fear" factor. Notwithstanding the end-of-week sell-off, the bulls are greedy and the bears are on the run. And the more that inflated stock prices entice shorting, the more games that can be played to "squeeze" the timid bears.

The end result is a highly speculative stock market increasingly detached from reality and vulnerable to wild swings in sentiment. Yet I don't expect the emerging global reflation this time to disprove the US bearish thesis, although it will no doubt be a wild market ride.

The bond market was happy with last week's developments. The Federal Reserve confirmed it will be especially unhurried in raising rates and ending quantitative easing. Weak US economic data were seen as confirming the bullish bond view. To be sure, low market yields at home and abroad are imperative for global reflation to gain a head of steam. And I would argue that (over-liquefied) bond markets are subject to their own pricing anomalies.
In contrast to stocks, bonds have been fixated on US economic vulnerabilities and the Fed, while content to downplay reflation risks. Last week's data doesn't have me second-guessing the thesis of bond market vulnerability to global reflation dynamics. For bonds as well, the backdrop is set for a wild, speculative market ride.

WEEKLY WATCH
For the week, the S&P500 dipped 0.6% (up 11.2% y-t-d), and the Dow declined 0.5% (up 6.2% y-t-d). The Banks added 0.8% (up 3.4%), while the Broker/Dealers declined 2.0% (up 41.7%). The Morgan Stanley Cyclicals fell 1.6% (up 49.4%), and the Transports declined 1.2% (up 4.8%). The Morgan Stanley Consumer index slipped 0.2% (up 8.2%), while the Utilities added 0.2% (down 1.3%). The S&P 400 Mid-Caps gave back 1.4% (up 20.0%), and the small cap Russell 2000 declined 1.5% (up 12.9%). The Nasdaq100 (up 33.0%) and the Morgan Stanley High Tech (up 45.8%) indices both declined 0.4%. The Semiconductors fell 1.3% (up 38.9%), and the InteractiveWeek Internet index declined 0.6% (up 51.3%). The Biotechs slipped 0.2% (up 32.7%). With Bullion down $6.50, the HUI gold index dropped 2.4% (up 18.2%).

One-month Treasury bill rates ended the week at 9 bps, and three-month bills closed at 18 bps. Two-year government yields sank 24 bps to 0.96%. Five-year T-note yields plunged 32 bps to 2.46%. Ten-year yields fell 29 bps to 3.57%. Long bond yields were down 18 bps at 4.42%. Benchmark Fannie MBS yields dropped 30 bps to 4.50%. The spread between 10-year Treasuries and benchmark MBS narrowed one to 93. Agency 10-yr debt spreads increased 4 to 9 bps. The implied yield on December eurodollar futures sank 19.5 bps to 0.605%. The 2-year dollar swap spread declined 5.25 to 40 bps; the 10-year dollar swap spread declined 10.25 to 22 bps; and the 30-year swap spread declined 11 to negative 15.5 bps. Corporate bond spreads were mixed. An index of investment grade bond spreads widened 5 bps to 171, while an index of junk spreads narrowed 29 to 720 bps.

Investment grade issuers included GE Capital $1.5bn, Praxair $600 million, Howard Hughes Medical $600 million, Blackstone $600 million, Dominion Resources $500 million, Hyatt Hotels $500 million, Discovery Communications $500 million, Southeast Supply $375 million, Ralcorp $300 million, Raymond James $300 million, Cleveland Electric $300 million, Buckeye Partners $275 million, Snap-On $250 million, Federal Realty Trust $150 million, and Brown University $100 million.

Junk bond fund inflows were strong again at $570 million (from AMG). The long list of junk issuers included Sprint Nextel $1.3bn, Dish $1.0bn, Case New Holland $1.0bn, NII Capital $800 million, Berry Petroleum $450 million, American Casino $375 million, Brunswick $350 million, Mediacom $350 million, Prologis $350 million, Ball Corp $325 million, Penn National Gaming $325 million, Apria Healthcare $318 million, Clean Harbors $300 million, Quicksilver $300 million, Hornbeck Offshore Services $250 million, Sirius XM Radio $250 million, CPM Holdings $200 million, Graphic Packaging $180 million, Olin Corp $150 million, and Alliance One $100 million.

I saw no convert issues.

International dollar debt issuers included Nationwide Building Society $4.0bn, Credit Suisse $2.0bn, Robo Bank $1.5bn, Deutsche Bank $1.0bn, Petrotrin $850 million, Finance for Danish Industry $1.0bn, Grupo Petrotemex $200 million and Lloyds Bank $150 million.

Continued 1 2


The bill will fall due for crisis failures (Aug 13, '09)


1.
China to roll out the big guns

2. The closing of the Christian womb

3. Jihad bling bling

4. Tough sanctions won't tame Tehran

5. China calls halt to Gwadar refinery

6. Stupidity without borders

7. Syria pulls some strings in Iran

8. The bill is coming due

9. Karzai suffers an election blow

10. US casino bosses vary Macau bet

(24 hours to 11:59pm ET, Aug 13, 2009)

 
 


 

All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
© Copyright 1999 - 2009 Asia Times Online (Holdings), Ltd.
Head Office: Unit B, 16/F, Li Dong Building, No. 9 Li Yuen Street East, Central, Hong Kong
Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110