WRITE for ATol ADVERTISE MEDIA KIT GET ATol BY EMAIL ABOUT ATol CONTACT US
Asia Time Online - Daily News
             
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese



     
     Jun 14, 2012


Revolution knocks for Rio+20
By Thalif Deen

UNITED NATIONS - When world leaders at the Rio+20 United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development in Brazil next week endorse the final plan of action, titled "The Future We Want", a lingering question may remain unanswered: how best can the United Nations transform political platitudes into economic realities?

As the 193-member Preparatory Committee (PrepCom) for Rio+20 (so called as it is being held two decades after the original UN "Earth Summit" in Rio de Janeiro in 1992) continues its final round of negotiations through Friday in the same Brazilian city this week, and perhaps beyond if the current deadlock between leaders and various involved organizations continues, there are several proposals already on the table for institutional reform or the creation of new bodies.

These proposals include strengthening of the existing UN

 

Environment Programme (UNEP) by upgrading it to a full-fledged UN agency; establishing a Global Economic Coordination Council; creating a Global Sustainable Development Council and the granddaddy of all, the establishment of a mega World Environment Organization (WEO).

The WEO, a proposal that has been kicked around the UN system for over two decades, was resurrected last week by French President Francois Hollande.

He said a WEO, "like the World Trade Organization or the International Labour Organization", would contribute to the success of Rio+20.

The president of the UN General Assembly, Nassir Abdulaziz al-Nasser, said the Rio+20 summit needs to produce "a strong institutional architecture ... This architecture must promote a better integration of the three dimensions of sustainable development: economic, social and environment protection."

It must also address new and emerging issues, review the sustainability of progress achieved, and monitor the implementation of the commitment, he said.

Last week, UN secretary-general Ban Ki-moon also reiterated the "need for a new institutional framework to support our shared sustainable development goals (SDGs) - an effective body that can track their progress".

This body, he said, should have both high-level political engagement, and space for civil society, local authorities and the private sector to contribute their knowledge and expertise.

The United Nations has already begun to organize for the post-2015 challenge, which that will closely follow the targeted date, 2015, for the achievement of the Millennium Development Goals and the beginning of SDGs.

"I have asked the heads of the UN Development Group and the executive committee on economic and social affairs to mobilize the entire UN system behind this effort," he said.

For starters, he announced last week the creation of a new post of assistant secretary general to oversee the post-2015 implementation of SDGs: Amina J Mohammed of Nigeria will be Ban's special adviser on post-2015 development planning.

An adjunct professor at Columbia University, New York, she has also served as the senior special assistant to the president of Nigeria on the MDGs.

Ban also announced a "High-Level Panel of Eminent Persons" to advise on a post-2015 way forward: President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono of Indonesia, President Ellen Johnson Sirleaf of Liberia, and British Prime Minister David Cameron, with further appointments to follow.

In his detailed proposals for a sustainable global society, Daisaku Ikeda, president of the Tokyo-based Soka Gakkai International, has called for the establishment of a new international organization through the merger of UN agencies in the fields of the environment and development.

A global organization for sustainable development should be the outcome of a bold, qualitative transformation of the current system along the following lines: the consolidation of relevant sections and agencies, including the UN Development Programme (UNDP) and UNEP.

"We need to develop the institutional capacity to implement comprehensive responses that prioritize the actual and expressed needs of people and build the foundation for lives of dignity," he added.

At present, he pointed out, both UNDP and UNEP are structured so that only those states that are members of the respective governing councils can have a final say in decisions.

"In light of the importance of sustainable development and the wide range of issues and sectors involved, we must ensure that all states that wish to may participate in full," Ikeda said.

Chakravarthy Raghavan, a journalist who has covered the UN both in New York and Geneva, told IPS the idea of WEO, or UNEP becoming a separate agency, has been around since 1992.

A new agency, of course, means more posts, and if funded like the UNDP, means more control from the North, and more money spent. And once any agency is created, the fundamental law of politics kicks in: governments decide on policies, and create institutions to carry them out, he said.

"Very soon, those in the institutions attempt to change the policies to suit their interests and needs," said Raghavan, who covered the 1992 Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro. "But it is not clear what is the value added; the UN charter envisaged the Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) to undertake a supervisory and coordinating role."

That has long fallen into disuse, and its meetings now only enable agency heads to come and deliver long perorations, and "questions" from the floor, that more often than not get no answers, he said.

Raghavan said that Agenda 21, which was adopted at the Earth Summit, also referred to institutional arrangements for a follow-up.

"The idea of a WEO, with an overarching coordinating and institutional role had come up even then," he said.

However, at PrepCom meetings during the 1992 summit, the idea met with resistance from the developed countries, and various specialized agencies. In fact, in terms of the UN Charter, the ECOSOC was given this role (along the lines of the Security Council on security issues), but ECOSOC gradually eroded into a talk shop, said Raghavan.

Meanwhile, as a follow-up to the Earth Summit post-1992, there were several institutions, funds and/or commissions and conventions that were set up to deal with environment and development.

These include the Global Environment Facility (GEF) run jointly by the World Bank, the UNDP and UNEP; the UN Commission on Sustainable Development; the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change and the UN Convention to Combat Desertification.

(Inter Press Service)





Europe's MPs dodge Rio development summit (May 18, '12)

Draw at Doha
(May 1, '12)


1.
Syrian violence invites foreign intervention

2. The worm that turned on the US

3. Taiwan circling South China Sea bait

4. Towards a new Arab cultural revolution

5. China's Afghan oil deal on the skids

6. The Muslim revolution 'hiding in plain sight'

7. Why Putin is being so helpful to the US

8. US and China: a mutual mistrust endures

9. Dangers of stalled nuclear talks in Moscow

10. Myanmar's military reform gap

(24 hours to 11:59pm ET, Jun 12, 2012)

 
 


 

All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
© Copyright 1999 - 2012 Asia Times Online (Holdings), Ltd.
Head Office: Unit B, 16/F, Li Dong Building, No. 9 Li Yuen Street East, Central, Hong Kong
Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110