Japan

The scandal of Japanese aid to Indonesia
By Nobuyuki Takahashi

Indonesia is inescapably tied to Japan, especially in economic relations. As of March 2001, official development assistance (ODA) by the Japanese government to Indonesia had accumulated to 4.34 trillion yen (about US$36 billion). Out of that total, 89 percent was yen loans. At the same time financial assistance provided by the Export-Import Bank of Japan (now merged with the Japan Bank of International Cooperation, or JBIC) mounted to 4.217 trillion yen.

And up to 2000, since then president Suharto allowed foreign investment in 1967, Japanese companies concentrated the largest amount of foreign direct investment (FDI) in Indonesia with a share of 14.1 percent. As a result, according to the Japanese Foreign Ministry, products made by Japanese companies have dominated the Indonesian market, accounting for 65 percent of the refrigerators, 70 percent of the color TVs, 80 percent of the motorbikes and 90 percent of the cars in the country.

When the Asian financial crisis struck in 1997, Indonesia was hit hardest, a fact that eventually ended the long dictatorship of president Suharto. Under International Monetary Fund (IMF) conditions of extremely tight fiscal policy, the Suharto administration was trapped between currency speculators and a national democracy movement fueled by the Indonesian people's accusations that Suharto himself was to blame for the crisis. By failing to implement IMF conditions he lost his source of financial rescue and expose the rupiah to devaluation, thereby expanding the country's indebtedness to Japan.

Japanese prime minister Kiichi Miyazawa advocated bilateral cooperation with Indonesia, but as Japan was in reality an integral part of the IMF-World Bank complex, Tokyo balked at resuming financial assistance before getting the green light from the IMF. Meanwhile in Indonesia, opposition to the Suharto family - accused of taking $15 billion in bribes during the regime - grew, exposing the Japanese government and corporations as the despised administration's biggest financial sponsor and economic partner for more than 30 years. Yet without developmental aid from Japan, the country cannot launch real reforms and emerge from the shadow of the Suharto era.

Public opinion in Japan requires structural reform of the Foreign Ministry and transparency of ODA toward Indonesia and other underdeveloped countries, since the huge amount of official money involved has lured general contractors and private companies into making connections with ministry officials. The criminal case against Suzuki Muneo, the former director general of Hokkaido Development Agency, is just the tip of the iceberg of the ailing structure of Japanese aid policy. Muneo, a former member of Japan's ruling Liberal Democratic Party, raised a political contribution of 400 million yen in one year, nearly half of it from companies that won public tenders.

An example of the hardship caused by the relations between the Japanese Foreign Ministry and the Suharto family is the Koto Panjang dam project on the Indonesian island of Sumatra, financed by 31.2 billion yen in Japanese ODA. The project, involving Hazama Corp and Tokyo Electric Power Group, forced 23,000 residents to live under harsh conditions for more than 10 years, with many of them evicted from their villages. Thousands of these people are now taking their complaint to the Japanese courts. On September 5, the first-ever lawsuit involving Japanese government ODA will take place in Tokyo District Court. There are already an unprecedented 3,200 plaintiffs in the case, a number expected to swell to more than 5,000 by September. They allege that while 30 billion yen went to Japanese contractors and the Suharto family, residents were deprived of their homes and means of making a living, and a huge amount of debt has been placed on the shoulders of Indonesian people.

The sad story began in the early 1980s, when Tokyo Electric Power Service Co Ltd conducted a feasibility study at the Koto Panjang dam construction site as requested by the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA), an affiliate of the Foreign Ministry. The study failed to confirm power demand to justify the project. However, in the late 1980s the Suharto administration announced a new plantation project in Sumatra to provide the needed justification for the power project. As a result, JICA and the Overseas Economic Corporation Fund (OECF), now merged into the JBIC, started initial funding and construction began in 1993.

  • Next: The victims of Japanese aid

    (©2002 Asia Times Online Co, Ltd. All rights reserved. Please contact content@atimes.com for information on our sales and syndication policies.)


  •  
    Aug 2, 2002



    Japan's troubled foreign aid policy  (Jul 30, '02)
     

     

    Affiliates
    Click here to be one)

     

     
       
             
    No material from Asia Times Online may be republished in any form without written permission.
    Copyright Asia Times Online, 6306 The Center, Queen’s Road, Central, Hong Kong.