Japan

Koizumi trades Baghdad for Pyongyang
By J Sean Curtin
Pacific Forum CSIS

After months of walking a delicate tightrope of neutrality on the Iraq crisis, Japanese Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi has finally taken a firm policy position in favor of the United States. Even though polls show that the overwhelming majority of Japanese are against a US-led attack on Iraq, Koizumi is exhibiting surprising confidence as he embarks on his greatest political gamble.

Backing a war against Iraq would seem to go against the tenets of Koizumi's popularist inclinations, but his current strategy is based on a careful set of calculations in a high stakes game of international policy-poker. In essence, the prime minister is risking his political future on the assumption that his weak hand on Iraq can be successfully trumped by a winning policy ace on North Korea.

While ordinary Japanese are definitely concerned about a looming attack on distant Iraq, it is nearby North Korea that dominates national discourse. From the sales clerk to the company president, it is the threat of an unstable and nuclear North Korea that deeply troubles most ordinary Japanese. Herein likes the heart of Koizumi's survival strategy. Koizumi has calculated that the national mood is such that he can successfully implement a highly unpopular Iraq policy by eventually trading it off against the more pressing North Korean issue. While he knows that about 80 percent of Japanese are against a war with Iraq, he also knows that nearly 100 percent are frightened by the recent bellicose statements coming out of North Korea. Any kind of policy resolution on the Korea crisis will require the assistance and active support of the United States. Koizumi will argue that Japan has no alternative but to support the United States fully on Iraq, if it expects help solving the North Korea issue.

While the Japanese public might find this tradeoff distasteful, it has the merit of being an understandable and salable policy to people genuinely worried about Pyongyang's intentions. This situation means that unlike many of his lackluster predecessors, Koizumi should be able to deliver Washington vital support when it is needed, as well as display some leadership on the world stage.

While still trying to sustain the illusion of an even-handed policy approach on Iraq, Koizumi has now resolutely nailed his colors to the US banner. Japan demonstrated its clear support for the US position at the open debate of the United Nations Security Council on February 18. In that session, Japan acted as a standard bearer for the United States. During the proceedings, only Japan and Australia declared resolute support for the position of the US and Britain. The vast majority of other countries backed an alternative approach that emphasized a peaceful resolution to the crisis and delaying the use of force.

Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) secretary general Yamasaki Taku has also suggested that Japan must support Washington, even without a new resolution. He said Iraq will "not accept inspections the moment it hears there will be no use of force". This strongly indicates that Japan would support a US offensive without a second UN resolution backing the use of force. Foreign Minister Kawaguchi Yoriko and Chief Cabinet Secretary Fukuda Yasuo have attempted to conceal the new policy by stating that because discussion is still ongoing, it is too early to actually clarify the precise Japanese position on Iraq. Koizumi has joined in by denying that Japan would automatically support a unilateral attack on Iraq. However, Japan's actions at the Security Council make its real intentions clear.

The clarification of Japan's policy at the UN debate brought a torrent of fierce criticism from all corners of the political spectrum, especially from Koizumi's rivals and enemies within his own party, the LDP. The media have been inundated with harsh comments by prominent LDP politicians unhappy with Koizumi's stance.

The main opposition Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ) has sensed a chance to make political capital and has adopted an aggressive anti-war stance. DPJ leader Kan Naoto accused the government of "acting contrary to the wishes of most of the Japanese people". DPJ policy affairs chief Edano Yukio described Koizumi as "double-tongued" for announcing Japan's position at the UN while refusing to do so in the Diet (Japanese parliament). Many elements of the media have also adopted a skeptical and angry tone.

Yet, in the middle of this vicious onslaught, Koizumi remains calm. In the past he has demonstrated that he is a supreme master at judging the public mood, and this time he must be banking on his instincts being right.

Of course, poker on this scale is still a game of chance and nobody knows what the result will be until all the cards are on the table. Nevertheless, as Koizumi plays out the greatest poker hand of his political life, he must feel that the odds are on his side.

J Sean Curtin writes a weekly Japanese Social Trends Series for the Tokyo-based think-tank Global Communications from JapanHe is also a professor at the Japanese Red Cross University. He can be reached at jeanseancurtin@hotmail.com.This article is posted by permission of Pacific Forum CSIS.
 
Mar 18, 2003


Trans-Atlantic versus trans-Pacific alliances
(Feb 27, '03)

Hawks coming out of the woodwork
(Feb 26, '03)

Japan's spontaneous support for war
(Feb 14, '03)

 

Affiliates
Click here to be one)

 

 
   
         
No material from Asia Times Online may be republished in any form without written permission.
Copyright Asia Times Online, 6306 The Center, Queen’s Road, Central, Hong Kong.