Advertise with ATimes!

Search Asia Times

Advanced Search

 
Japan

The Xi'an incident: No love affair
By Katsuo Hiizumi

"It was scripted as a gesture of love; it ended up generating a lot of hate," is how Asahi Shimbun writers Kazuto Tsukamato and Kentaro Kurihara characterized the incident. They reported that on October 29, three Japanese students and a Japanese teacher at Xi'an's Northwest University performed a "bawdy skit" at the university's cultural festival.

The incident and its aftermath were significant in a number of ways. Through it we have once again been reminded that - large-scale Japanese investment in China and fast-growing economic relations notwithstanding - even small incidents can quickly fan the flames of Chinese antipathy (hatred?) toward Japan that still burn more than half a century after World War II. But perhaps even more important, the matter has given us insight into modern Chinese governance and its attitude toward protest as the precursor to democracy.

"Most of the other performances, such as traditional dances, were of a serious nature," wrote the Asahi Shimbun journalists of the Xi'an incident. "For their skit, however, the four [Japanese] wore red bras over their T-shirts and paper cups in the front of their trousers, apparently to suggest male genitals. The phrase 'What are you looking at?' was written on their hats. Some of the four apparently removed cut-up pieces of paper from their bras and tossed them into the crowd. At the end of the skit, the three students reportedly intended to turn their backs to the audience to show they had written the words 'Japan' and 'China' as well as [a] 'heart sign' implying 'love' [on signs on their backs]. By expressing the phrase 'Japan loves China' or 'China loves Japan', the four apparently wanted to promote friendly relations between the two countries."

Alas, the Chinese audience and newspapers saw it differently. The skit caused an immediate uproar and was halted in the middle of the performance by a Chinese teacher. According to Chinese press reports, the "Japan" sign was worn by the person with the fake penis, the "China" sign by the person with the red bra - and that, of course (if true), makes it a somewhat different story.

"Japan loves [or whatever?] Chinese whores," became the message. Recall that not very long ago, a group of about 280 Japanese businessmen on a company trip to Zhuhai (in southern China near Hong Kong) reportedly engaged in a sex orgy with about 500 (!) Chinese prostitutes in a resort hotel - to the outrage of all of China and unprintable venom in Chinese Internet chat rooms. To say the very least, the Xi'an skit displayed some very bad timing.

The October 29 (a Wednesday) incident touched off violent protests over the "deep insult to China" that continued through the following weekend. Protesters also called for the boycott of Japanese products. Several Japanese restaurants were besieged. A Japanese man and woman suffered slight injuries in skirmishes prompted by throngs of protesters at a dormitory for foreign students. Police transferred all students in the dormitory to local hotels for their safety.

Since then, Northwest University authorities have expelled the three Japanese students and dismissed the Japanese teacher and they have returned home after writing a letter of apology. The protests have ceased rather than spreading to the rest of the country as had been feared.

Arguably, had a Xi'an-type skit been put on at any Japanese university, its lewd nature would not have caused offense - though I'm not so sure exactly how Japanese students would have reacted to a skit like that put on by Chinese students and with reversed signs and symbols. In any case, China is not Japan and at least the Japanese teacher should have known better.

But there is also another angle to the story. The anti-Japanese protests after the Zhuhai and Xi'an incidents remind me of similar protests in Thailand in the early 1970s. When then Japanese prime minister Kakuei Tanaka visited Bangkok in January 1974, he could not even leave his hotel because of the huge number of students protesting Japan's increasing domination of the Thai economy, shouting "Boycott Japanese products" and "We don't need Japanese in Thailand." But these nationalist students were the same students who were fighting military dictatorship and demanding democratic freedoms. Nationalist anti-Japanese protests were the spark; but by the end of the 1970s democracy had won.

Northwest University in Xi'an is not Peking University. But it is one of the most prestigious universities in western China. I do not know if its students are critical of the present government. But elite students in China to one degree or another usually are and want to see more rapid progress toward democracy. The fact that large-scale anti-Japanese nationalist demonstrations could quickly turn into pro-democracy demonstrations is not lost on the Beijing government. It is therefore not surprising that Xi'an authorities, after letting the students blow off some steam, quickly moved to contain the local demonstrations to forestall larger nationwide protests. Patriotism, no matter how sparked, has a tendency to lead to reflection on social and political basics and - historically - that's not necessarily to the advantage of a nation's rulers.

As for the Japanese students and teacher who caused the Xi'an uproar, I can only pity them. They studied, taught and lived in China. How could they have been so insensitive to their fellow students' and teachers' beliefs and feelings? Probably by keeping their distance and mostly talking to each other or themselves. Any way I look at it, as a teacher of Chinese history at a Japanese university, I find the whole affair more than a little unsettling.

Katsuo Hiizumi teaches modern East Asian history with special reference to China and overseas Chinese at Aichi Prefectural University, Nagoya. From 1983-85 and from 1988-92, he served in Bangkok as a special assistant to the Japanese Ministry of Foreign Affairs. His publications include Kakyo Konekushon (The Overseas Chinese Connection), Kyogeki to Chugokujin (Peking Opera and Chinese), and The Past and Present of Chinese Economic Area.

(Copyright 2003 Asia Times Online Co, Ltd. All rights reserved. Please contact content@atimes.com for information on our sales and syndication policies.)
 
Nov 21, 2003



Japan's risky anti-foreign rhetoric (Nov 20, '03)

Only Koizumi cannot go to China (Oct 16 '03)

 


   
         
No material from Asia Times Online may be republished in any form without written permission.
Copyright 2003, Asia Times Online, 4305 Far East Finance Centre, 16 Harcourt Rd, Central, Hong Kong